Labeling food safety attributes: to inform or not to inform?

Abstract We examine the impact of food labels that make unsupported claims of food safety and labels that provide information to support such claims on consumer choices and examine consumers’ willingness to pay for beef products with these different food safety labeling cues. Empirical results from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kofi Britwum, Amalia Yiannaka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-02-01
Series:Agricultural and Food Economics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40100-019-0123-y
id doaj-1e01e7cf92ea49878a6cb6e2d8395e71
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e01e7cf92ea49878a6cb6e2d8395e712020-11-25T01:41:56ZengSpringerOpenAgricultural and Food Economics2193-75322019-02-017112110.1186/s40100-019-0123-yLabeling food safety attributes: to inform or not to inform?Kofi Britwum0Amalia Yiannaka1Postdoctoral Research Associate, School of Economics, University of MaineDepartment of Agricultural Economics, University of Nebraska-LincolnAbstract We examine the impact of food labels that make unsupported claims of food safety and labels that provide information to support such claims on consumer choices and examine consumers’ willingness to pay for beef products with these different food safety labeling cues. Empirical results from a survey of grocery shoppers in a Midwestern city in the USA show that more than two thirds of respondents who received a label with unsubstantiated food safety claims chose this option and were willing to pay the highest price premium for it, compared to the less preferred labeling options that provided information to support food safety claims.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40100-019-0123-yFood labelsGround beefSurveyVaccines against E. coliWillingness to pay
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kofi Britwum
Amalia Yiannaka
spellingShingle Kofi Britwum
Amalia Yiannaka
Labeling food safety attributes: to inform or not to inform?
Agricultural and Food Economics
Food labels
Ground beef
Survey
Vaccines against E. coli
Willingness to pay
author_facet Kofi Britwum
Amalia Yiannaka
author_sort Kofi Britwum
title Labeling food safety attributes: to inform or not to inform?
title_short Labeling food safety attributes: to inform or not to inform?
title_full Labeling food safety attributes: to inform or not to inform?
title_fullStr Labeling food safety attributes: to inform or not to inform?
title_full_unstemmed Labeling food safety attributes: to inform or not to inform?
title_sort labeling food safety attributes: to inform or not to inform?
publisher SpringerOpen
series Agricultural and Food Economics
issn 2193-7532
publishDate 2019-02-01
description Abstract We examine the impact of food labels that make unsupported claims of food safety and labels that provide information to support such claims on consumer choices and examine consumers’ willingness to pay for beef products with these different food safety labeling cues. Empirical results from a survey of grocery shoppers in a Midwestern city in the USA show that more than two thirds of respondents who received a label with unsubstantiated food safety claims chose this option and were willing to pay the highest price premium for it, compared to the less preferred labeling options that provided information to support food safety claims.
topic Food labels
Ground beef
Survey
Vaccines against E. coli
Willingness to pay
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40100-019-0123-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kofibritwum labelingfoodsafetyattributestoinformornottoinform
AT amaliayiannaka labelingfoodsafetyattributestoinformornottoinform
_version_ 1725038796723978240