Prospective audit and feedback on antibiotic use in neonatal intensive care: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs potentially lead to appropriate antibiotic use, yet the optimal approach for neonates is uncertain. Such a program was implemented in a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit in October 2012. We evaluated the impact of this program on antimi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nisha Thampi, Prakesh S. Shah, Sandra Nelson, Amisha Agarwal, Marilyn Steinberg, Yenge Diambomba, Andrew M. Morris
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-04-01
Series:BMC Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12887-019-1481-z
id doaj-1e02f0abe5ee4f28b72a85d850500488
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e02f0abe5ee4f28b72a85d8505004882020-11-25T03:52:49ZengBMCBMC Pediatrics1471-24312019-04-011911810.1186/s12887-019-1481-zProspective audit and feedback on antibiotic use in neonatal intensive care: a retrospective cohort studyNisha Thampi0Prakesh S. Shah1Sandra Nelson2Amisha Agarwal3Marilyn Steinberg4Yenge Diambomba5Andrew M. Morris6Department of Pediatrics, CHEODepartment of Pediatrics, Sinai Health SystemAntimicrobial Stewardship Program, Sinai Health System-University Health NetworkResearch Institute, CHEOAntimicrobial Stewardship Program, Sinai Health System-University Health NetworkDepartment of Pediatrics, Sinai Health SystemAntimicrobial Stewardship Program, Sinai Health System-University Health NetworkAbstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs potentially lead to appropriate antibiotic use, yet the optimal approach for neonates is uncertain. Such a program was implemented in a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit in October 2012. We evaluated the impact of this program on antimicrobial use and its association with clinical outcomes. Methods In a retrospective cohort study, we examined 1580 neonates who received antimicrobials in the 13-months before and 13-months during program implementation. Prospective audit and feedback was given 5 days a week on each patient who was receiving antibiotic. Pharmacy and microbiology data were linked to clinical data from the local Canadian Neonatal Network database. The primary outcome was days of antibiotic therapy per 1000 patient-days; secondary outcomes included mortality, necrotizing enterocolitis, and antibiotic duration for culture-positive and culture-negative late-onset sepsis. The breadth of antibiotic exposure was compared using the Antibiotic Spectrum Index. Results Overall antibiotic use decreased to 339 days of therapy per 1000 patient-days from 395 (14%, P < 0.001), without an increase in mortality. There was no difference in duration of therapy in culture-negative or culture-positive sepsis, rates of necrotizing enterocolitis, or breadth of antibiotic exposure. Fewer antibiotic starts occurred during program implementation (63% versus 59%, P < 0.001). The use of narrow-spectrum agents decreased (P < 0.001) whereas the use of cefotaxime increased (P = 0.016) during program implementation. Conclusions Daily prospective audit and feedback was not associated with a change in antibiotic duration or clinical outcomes, however there were fewer babies started on antibiotics, suggesting that additional interventions are required to inform and sustain changes in antibiotic prescribing practices.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12887-019-1481-zProspective audit and feedbackAntibioticsNeonatalIntensive careAntimicrobial stewardship
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nisha Thampi
Prakesh S. Shah
Sandra Nelson
Amisha Agarwal
Marilyn Steinberg
Yenge Diambomba
Andrew M. Morris
spellingShingle Nisha Thampi
Prakesh S. Shah
Sandra Nelson
Amisha Agarwal
Marilyn Steinberg
Yenge Diambomba
Andrew M. Morris
Prospective audit and feedback on antibiotic use in neonatal intensive care: a retrospective cohort study
BMC Pediatrics
Prospective audit and feedback
Antibiotics
Neonatal
Intensive care
Antimicrobial stewardship
author_facet Nisha Thampi
Prakesh S. Shah
Sandra Nelson
Amisha Agarwal
Marilyn Steinberg
Yenge Diambomba
Andrew M. Morris
author_sort Nisha Thampi
title Prospective audit and feedback on antibiotic use in neonatal intensive care: a retrospective cohort study
title_short Prospective audit and feedback on antibiotic use in neonatal intensive care: a retrospective cohort study
title_full Prospective audit and feedback on antibiotic use in neonatal intensive care: a retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Prospective audit and feedback on antibiotic use in neonatal intensive care: a retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Prospective audit and feedback on antibiotic use in neonatal intensive care: a retrospective cohort study
title_sort prospective audit and feedback on antibiotic use in neonatal intensive care: a retrospective cohort study
publisher BMC
series BMC Pediatrics
issn 1471-2431
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Abstract Background Antimicrobial stewardship programs potentially lead to appropriate antibiotic use, yet the optimal approach for neonates is uncertain. Such a program was implemented in a tertiary care neonatal intensive care unit in October 2012. We evaluated the impact of this program on antimicrobial use and its association with clinical outcomes. Methods In a retrospective cohort study, we examined 1580 neonates who received antimicrobials in the 13-months before and 13-months during program implementation. Prospective audit and feedback was given 5 days a week on each patient who was receiving antibiotic. Pharmacy and microbiology data were linked to clinical data from the local Canadian Neonatal Network database. The primary outcome was days of antibiotic therapy per 1000 patient-days; secondary outcomes included mortality, necrotizing enterocolitis, and antibiotic duration for culture-positive and culture-negative late-onset sepsis. The breadth of antibiotic exposure was compared using the Antibiotic Spectrum Index. Results Overall antibiotic use decreased to 339 days of therapy per 1000 patient-days from 395 (14%, P < 0.001), without an increase in mortality. There was no difference in duration of therapy in culture-negative or culture-positive sepsis, rates of necrotizing enterocolitis, or breadth of antibiotic exposure. Fewer antibiotic starts occurred during program implementation (63% versus 59%, P < 0.001). The use of narrow-spectrum agents decreased (P < 0.001) whereas the use of cefotaxime increased (P = 0.016) during program implementation. Conclusions Daily prospective audit and feedback was not associated with a change in antibiotic duration or clinical outcomes, however there were fewer babies started on antibiotics, suggesting that additional interventions are required to inform and sustain changes in antibiotic prescribing practices.
topic Prospective audit and feedback
Antibiotics
Neonatal
Intensive care
Antimicrobial stewardship
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12887-019-1481-z
work_keys_str_mv AT nishathampi prospectiveauditandfeedbackonantibioticuseinneonatalintensivecarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT prakeshsshah prospectiveauditandfeedbackonantibioticuseinneonatalintensivecarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT sandranelson prospectiveauditandfeedbackonantibioticuseinneonatalintensivecarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT amishaagarwal prospectiveauditandfeedbackonantibioticuseinneonatalintensivecarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT marilynsteinberg prospectiveauditandfeedbackonantibioticuseinneonatalintensivecarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT yengediambomba prospectiveauditandfeedbackonantibioticuseinneonatalintensivecarearetrospectivecohortstudy
AT andrewmmorris prospectiveauditandfeedbackonantibioticuseinneonatalintensivecarearetrospectivecohortstudy
_version_ 1724480732236087296