Tree-root control of shallow landslides

Tree roots have long been recognized to increase slope stability by reinforcing the strength of soils. Slope stability models usually include the effects of roots by adding an apparent cohesion to the soil to simulate root strength. No model includes the combined effects of root distribution het...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Cohen, M. Schwarz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2017-08-01
Series:Earth Surface Dynamics
Online Access:https://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/5/451/2017/esurf-5-451-2017.pdf
id doaj-1e221db11a7842f3a0806de6bdc2d796
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e221db11a7842f3a0806de6bdc2d7962020-11-24T22:07:29ZengCopernicus PublicationsEarth Surface Dynamics2196-63112196-632X2017-08-01545147710.5194/esurf-5-451-2017Tree-root control of shallow landslidesD. Cohen0M. Schwarz1M. Schwarz2Department of Earth and Environmental Science, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, NM 87801, USASchool of Agricultural, Forest, and Food Sciences, Bern University of Applied Science, 3052 Zollikofen, SwitzerlandEcorisQ, 1205 Geneva, SwitzerlandTree roots have long been recognized to increase slope stability by reinforcing the strength of soils. Slope stability models usually include the effects of roots by adding an apparent cohesion to the soil to simulate root strength. No model includes the combined effects of root distribution heterogeneity, stress-strain behavior of root reinforcement, or root strength in compression. Recent field observations, however, indicate that shallow landslide triggering mechanisms are characterized by differential deformation that indicates localized activation of zones in tension, compression, and shear in the soil. Here we describe a new model for slope stability that specifically considers these effects. The model is a strain-step discrete element model that reproduces the self-organized redistribution of forces on a slope during rainfall-triggered shallow landslides. We use a conceptual sigmoidal-shaped hillslope with a clearing in its center to explore the effects of tree size, spacing, weak zones, maximum root-size diameter, and different root strength configurations. Simulation results indicate that tree roots can stabilize slopes that would otherwise fail without them and, in general, higher root density with higher root reinforcement results in a more stable slope. The variation in root stiffness with diameter can, in some cases, invert this relationship. Root tension provides more resistance to failure than root compression but roots with both tension and compression offer the best resistance to failure. Lateral (slope-parallel) tension can be important in cases when the magnitude of this force is comparable to the slope-perpendicular tensile force. In this case, lateral forces can bring to failure tree-covered areas with high root reinforcement. Slope failure occurs when downslope soil compression reaches the soil maximum strength. When this occurs depends on the amount of root tension upslope in both the slope-perpendicular and slope-parallel directions. Roots in tension can prevent failure by reducing soil compressive forces downslope. When root reinforcement is limited, a crack parallel to the slope forms near the top of the hillslope. Simulations with roots that fail across this crack always resulted in a landslide. Slopes that did not form a crack could either fail or remain stable, depending on root reinforcement. Tree spacing is important for the location of weak zones but tree location on the slope (with respect to where a crack opens) is as important. Finally, for the specific cases tested here, intermediate-sized roots (5 to 20 mm in diameter) appear to contribute most to root reinforcement. Our results show more complex behaviors than can be obtained with the traditional slope-uniform, apparent-cohesion approach. A full understanding of the mechanisms of shallow landslide triggering requires a complete re-evaluation of this traditional approach that cannot predict where and how forces are mobilized and distributed in roots and soils, and how these control shallow landslides shape, size, location, and timing.https://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/5/451/2017/esurf-5-451-2017.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. Cohen
M. Schwarz
M. Schwarz
spellingShingle D. Cohen
M. Schwarz
M. Schwarz
Tree-root control of shallow landslides
Earth Surface Dynamics
author_facet D. Cohen
M. Schwarz
M. Schwarz
author_sort D. Cohen
title Tree-root control of shallow landslides
title_short Tree-root control of shallow landslides
title_full Tree-root control of shallow landslides
title_fullStr Tree-root control of shallow landslides
title_full_unstemmed Tree-root control of shallow landslides
title_sort tree-root control of shallow landslides
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Earth Surface Dynamics
issn 2196-6311
2196-632X
publishDate 2017-08-01
description Tree roots have long been recognized to increase slope stability by reinforcing the strength of soils. Slope stability models usually include the effects of roots by adding an apparent cohesion to the soil to simulate root strength. No model includes the combined effects of root distribution heterogeneity, stress-strain behavior of root reinforcement, or root strength in compression. Recent field observations, however, indicate that shallow landslide triggering mechanisms are characterized by differential deformation that indicates localized activation of zones in tension, compression, and shear in the soil. Here we describe a new model for slope stability that specifically considers these effects. The model is a strain-step discrete element model that reproduces the self-organized redistribution of forces on a slope during rainfall-triggered shallow landslides. We use a conceptual sigmoidal-shaped hillslope with a clearing in its center to explore the effects of tree size, spacing, weak zones, maximum root-size diameter, and different root strength configurations. Simulation results indicate that tree roots can stabilize slopes that would otherwise fail without them and, in general, higher root density with higher root reinforcement results in a more stable slope. The variation in root stiffness with diameter can, in some cases, invert this relationship. Root tension provides more resistance to failure than root compression but roots with both tension and compression offer the best resistance to failure. Lateral (slope-parallel) tension can be important in cases when the magnitude of this force is comparable to the slope-perpendicular tensile force. In this case, lateral forces can bring to failure tree-covered areas with high root reinforcement. Slope failure occurs when downslope soil compression reaches the soil maximum strength. When this occurs depends on the amount of root tension upslope in both the slope-perpendicular and slope-parallel directions. Roots in tension can prevent failure by reducing soil compressive forces downslope. When root reinforcement is limited, a crack parallel to the slope forms near the top of the hillslope. Simulations with roots that fail across this crack always resulted in a landslide. Slopes that did not form a crack could either fail or remain stable, depending on root reinforcement. Tree spacing is important for the location of weak zones but tree location on the slope (with respect to where a crack opens) is as important. Finally, for the specific cases tested here, intermediate-sized roots (5 to 20 mm in diameter) appear to contribute most to root reinforcement. Our results show more complex behaviors than can be obtained with the traditional slope-uniform, apparent-cohesion approach. A full understanding of the mechanisms of shallow landslide triggering requires a complete re-evaluation of this traditional approach that cannot predict where and how forces are mobilized and distributed in roots and soils, and how these control shallow landslides shape, size, location, and timing.
url https://www.earth-surf-dynam.net/5/451/2017/esurf-5-451-2017.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dcohen treerootcontrolofshallowlandslides
AT mschwarz treerootcontrolofshallowlandslides
AT mschwarz treerootcontrolofshallowlandslides
_version_ 1725820157267279872