The Role of Computed Tomography in Blunt Abdominal Trauma

Introduction: Blunt injury trauma is regularly encountered in the emergency department. Diagnostic tools that help in optimum management of blunt abdominal trauma include; Focussed Assessment Sonography for Trauma scan, Diagnostic peritoneal lavage and Computed Tomography scan. The aim of this study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Om Bahadur Karki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nepal Medical Association 2015-12-01
Series:Journal of Nepal Medical Association
Online Access:http://jnma.com.np/jnma/index.php/jnma/article/view/2735
id doaj-1e2d504dbf214d9b96575b965a9c2455
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e2d504dbf214d9b96575b965a9c24552020-11-25T01:03:29ZengNepal Medical AssociationJournal of Nepal Medical Association0028-27151815-672X2015-12-01532002272302735The Role of Computed Tomography in Blunt Abdominal TraumaOm Bahadur Karki0Department of Surgery, Manipal College of Medical Sciences, Pokhara, Nepal.Introduction: Blunt injury trauma is regularly encountered in the emergency department. Diagnostic tools that help in optimum management of blunt abdominal trauma include; Focussed Assessment Sonography for Trauma scan, Diagnostic peritoneal lavage and Computed Tomography scan. The aim of this study is to determine the validity of CT scan as an accurate diagnostic tool and its role in management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma. 
 Methods: A prospective analysis of 80 patients of blunt abdomen trauma who were admitted in Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal within a span of 15 months was done. Demographic data, mechanism of trauma, management and outcomes were studied. Organ injuries were graded using the Organ Injury Scale guidelines. 
 Results: Most of the patients in our study were in the age group of 21-40 years with an M: F ratio of 2.3:1. Road traffic accident (47.5%) was the most common mechanism of injury. Spleen (27.5%) was the commonest organ injured. CT scan was superior to FAST scan and had sensitivity of 97.3% specificity 75% positive predictive value 98.6%. FAST scan had sensitivity of 78.9%, specificity 50%, positive predictive value 96% with p- value of 0.0034. 81% of patients were conservatively managed. 
 Conclusions: In conjunction with close clinical monitoring, CT scan is reliable in the evaluation and management of blunt abdominal trauma patients. Our study also shows CT as a superior diagnostic modality compared to FAST scan. 
 Keywords: blunt abdominal trauma; CT scan; FAST scan; road traffic accident.http://jnma.com.np/jnma/index.php/jnma/article/view/2735
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Om Bahadur Karki
spellingShingle Om Bahadur Karki
The Role of Computed Tomography in Blunt Abdominal Trauma
Journal of Nepal Medical Association
author_facet Om Bahadur Karki
author_sort Om Bahadur Karki
title The Role of Computed Tomography in Blunt Abdominal Trauma
title_short The Role of Computed Tomography in Blunt Abdominal Trauma
title_full The Role of Computed Tomography in Blunt Abdominal Trauma
title_fullStr The Role of Computed Tomography in Blunt Abdominal Trauma
title_full_unstemmed The Role of Computed Tomography in Blunt Abdominal Trauma
title_sort role of computed tomography in blunt abdominal trauma
publisher Nepal Medical Association
series Journal of Nepal Medical Association
issn 0028-2715
1815-672X
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Introduction: Blunt injury trauma is regularly encountered in the emergency department. Diagnostic tools that help in optimum management of blunt abdominal trauma include; Focussed Assessment Sonography for Trauma scan, Diagnostic peritoneal lavage and Computed Tomography scan. The aim of this study is to determine the validity of CT scan as an accurate diagnostic tool and its role in management of patients with blunt abdominal trauma. 
 Methods: A prospective analysis of 80 patients of blunt abdomen trauma who were admitted in Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal within a span of 15 months was done. Demographic data, mechanism of trauma, management and outcomes were studied. Organ injuries were graded using the Organ Injury Scale guidelines. 
 Results: Most of the patients in our study were in the age group of 21-40 years with an M: F ratio of 2.3:1. Road traffic accident (47.5%) was the most common mechanism of injury. Spleen (27.5%) was the commonest organ injured. CT scan was superior to FAST scan and had sensitivity of 97.3% specificity 75% positive predictive value 98.6%. FAST scan had sensitivity of 78.9%, specificity 50%, positive predictive value 96% with p- value of 0.0034. 81% of patients were conservatively managed. 
 Conclusions: In conjunction with close clinical monitoring, CT scan is reliable in the evaluation and management of blunt abdominal trauma patients. Our study also shows CT as a superior diagnostic modality compared to FAST scan. 
 Keywords: blunt abdominal trauma; CT scan; FAST scan; road traffic accident.
url http://jnma.com.np/jnma/index.php/jnma/article/view/2735
work_keys_str_mv AT ombahadurkarki theroleofcomputedtomographyinbluntabdominaltrauma
AT ombahadurkarki roleofcomputedtomographyinbluntabdominaltrauma
_version_ 1725201090927919104