Studying Linguistic and Cultural Contact in Borneo: Prospects and Challenges

In the variegated landscape of languages and cultures of Borneo, the study of languages is a powerful tool to shed light on the intricate history of relations that has long been obscured by the polarization between ‘Dayak’ and ‘Malay’. This article looks at some of the features of Lebu’ Kulit Kenyah...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Antonia Soriente
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Ledizioni 2014-11-01
Series:Antropologia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ledijournals.com/ojs/index.php/antropologia/article/view/255
id doaj-1e443058450a4e2697b9fa487a54c252
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e443058450a4e2697b9fa487a54c2522021-02-04T17:12:00ZengLedizioniAntropologia2281-40432420-84692014-11-0111 N.S.598110.14672/ada2014255%p185Studying Linguistic and Cultural Contact in Borneo: Prospects and ChallengesAntonia SorienteIn the variegated landscape of languages and cultures of Borneo, the study of languages is a powerful tool to shed light on the intricate history of relations that has long been obscured by the polarization between ‘Dayak’ and ‘Malay’. This article looks at some of the features of Lebu’ Kulit Kenyah, Penan Benalui, Punan Tubu’ and Ma’ Pnaan (Punan Malinau/Segah) languages to clarify the linguistic and cultural affiliations among groups that were otherwise lumped together in vague classifications. It demonstrates what is to follow: according to a number of phonological, morphological and lexical evidence, and other historical evidence, Lebu’ Kulit has to be listed among the Kayanic languages. Penan Benalui, like the other Penan languages, is not a Kenyah language, whereas Punan Tubu’, despite the alleged cultural and social similarity with other Punan groups, cannot be classified within the Penan branch nor with other Punan languages. Ma’ Pnaan or Punan Malinau/Segah is not a Punan language and is linguistically classified within the Kayanic branch of the Kayan-Kenyah subgroup.https://www.ledijournals.com/ojs/index.php/antropologia/article/view/255borneo, classification, languages, kenyah, punan, penan
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Antonia Soriente
spellingShingle Antonia Soriente
Studying Linguistic and Cultural Contact in Borneo: Prospects and Challenges
Antropologia
borneo, classification, languages, kenyah, punan, penan
author_facet Antonia Soriente
author_sort Antonia Soriente
title Studying Linguistic and Cultural Contact in Borneo: Prospects and Challenges
title_short Studying Linguistic and Cultural Contact in Borneo: Prospects and Challenges
title_full Studying Linguistic and Cultural Contact in Borneo: Prospects and Challenges
title_fullStr Studying Linguistic and Cultural Contact in Borneo: Prospects and Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Studying Linguistic and Cultural Contact in Borneo: Prospects and Challenges
title_sort studying linguistic and cultural contact in borneo: prospects and challenges
publisher Ledizioni
series Antropologia
issn 2281-4043
2420-8469
publishDate 2014-11-01
description In the variegated landscape of languages and cultures of Borneo, the study of languages is a powerful tool to shed light on the intricate history of relations that has long been obscured by the polarization between ‘Dayak’ and ‘Malay’. This article looks at some of the features of Lebu’ Kulit Kenyah, Penan Benalui, Punan Tubu’ and Ma’ Pnaan (Punan Malinau/Segah) languages to clarify the linguistic and cultural affiliations among groups that were otherwise lumped together in vague classifications. It demonstrates what is to follow: according to a number of phonological, morphological and lexical evidence, and other historical evidence, Lebu’ Kulit has to be listed among the Kayanic languages. Penan Benalui, like the other Penan languages, is not a Kenyah language, whereas Punan Tubu’, despite the alleged cultural and social similarity with other Punan groups, cannot be classified within the Penan branch nor with other Punan languages. Ma’ Pnaan or Punan Malinau/Segah is not a Punan language and is linguistically classified within the Kayanic branch of the Kayan-Kenyah subgroup.
topic borneo, classification, languages, kenyah, punan, penan
url https://www.ledijournals.com/ojs/index.php/antropologia/article/view/255
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniasoriente studyinglinguisticandculturalcontactinborneoprospectsandchallenges
_version_ 1724284974679457792