Un modèle-outil pour représenter le savoir technopédagogique disciplinaire des enseignants

The new Technopedagogical Disciplinary Knowledge model that we propose integrates different dimensions: discipline (D), personal epistemology (E), pedagogical knowledge (P) and technology knowledge (T). We acknowledge the existence of relationships between the components of the model that can be mor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sylviane Bachy
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Association Internationale de Pédagogie Universitaire 2014-05-01
Series:Revue Internationale de Pédagogie de l’Enseignement Supérieur
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/ripes/821
id doaj-1e4ddd3e2a5f475093e46e1ad9de6b41
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e4ddd3e2a5f475093e46e1ad9de6b412020-11-24T22:52:12ZfraAssociation Internationale de Pédagogie UniversitaireRevue Internationale de Pédagogie de l’Enseignement Supérieur2076-84272014-05-01Un modèle-outil pour représenter le savoir technopédagogique disciplinaire des enseignantsSylviane BachyThe new Technopedagogical Disciplinary Knowledge model that we propose integrates different dimensions: discipline (D), personal epistemology (E), pedagogical knowledge (P) and technology knowledge (T). We acknowledge the existence of relationships between the components of the model that can be more or less strong according to the profiles of teachers. All these dimensions are present in teachers’ profiles, but they do not have the same importance. In order to establish the different profiles of teachers we designed a questionnaire to test the component and the relationships. The questionnaire was submitted a first time in order to check if the items were understandable and if the profiles that emerged were reliable based on what we knew of and about the teachers. A second test was carried out based on comparing the answers of university and non-university teachers. The purpose was to test the consistency between groups of items and the correlations between the different dimensions of the model. It appears that the "pedagogical knowledge" dimension is significantly correlated with the other three dimensions (technological knowledge, personal epistemology and discipline). This consolidated framework has help build up education development coaching in teaching practices that imply technology.http://journals.openedition.org/ripes/821accompagnement pédagogiquee-learningmodèle-outilsavoir pédagogique disciplinaire
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sylviane Bachy
spellingShingle Sylviane Bachy
Un modèle-outil pour représenter le savoir technopédagogique disciplinaire des enseignants
Revue Internationale de Pédagogie de l’Enseignement Supérieur
accompagnement pédagogique
e-learning
modèle-outil
savoir pédagogique disciplinaire
author_facet Sylviane Bachy
author_sort Sylviane Bachy
title Un modèle-outil pour représenter le savoir technopédagogique disciplinaire des enseignants
title_short Un modèle-outil pour représenter le savoir technopédagogique disciplinaire des enseignants
title_full Un modèle-outil pour représenter le savoir technopédagogique disciplinaire des enseignants
title_fullStr Un modèle-outil pour représenter le savoir technopédagogique disciplinaire des enseignants
title_full_unstemmed Un modèle-outil pour représenter le savoir technopédagogique disciplinaire des enseignants
title_sort un modèle-outil pour représenter le savoir technopédagogique disciplinaire des enseignants
publisher Association Internationale de Pédagogie Universitaire
series Revue Internationale de Pédagogie de l’Enseignement Supérieur
issn 2076-8427
publishDate 2014-05-01
description The new Technopedagogical Disciplinary Knowledge model that we propose integrates different dimensions: discipline (D), personal epistemology (E), pedagogical knowledge (P) and technology knowledge (T). We acknowledge the existence of relationships between the components of the model that can be more or less strong according to the profiles of teachers. All these dimensions are present in teachers’ profiles, but they do not have the same importance. In order to establish the different profiles of teachers we designed a questionnaire to test the component and the relationships. The questionnaire was submitted a first time in order to check if the items were understandable and if the profiles that emerged were reliable based on what we knew of and about the teachers. A second test was carried out based on comparing the answers of university and non-university teachers. The purpose was to test the consistency between groups of items and the correlations between the different dimensions of the model. It appears that the "pedagogical knowledge" dimension is significantly correlated with the other three dimensions (technological knowledge, personal epistemology and discipline). This consolidated framework has help build up education development coaching in teaching practices that imply technology.
topic accompagnement pédagogique
e-learning
modèle-outil
savoir pédagogique disciplinaire
url http://journals.openedition.org/ripes/821
work_keys_str_mv AT sylvianebachy unmodeleoutilpourrepresenterlesavoirtechnopedagogiquedisciplinairedesenseignants
_version_ 1725666625882947584