Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines related to multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: High quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can provide clinicians with explicit recommendations on how to manage health conditions and bridge the gap between research and clinical practice. Unfortunately, the quality of CPGs for multiple sclerosis (MS) has not been evaluated. OBJEC...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jia Guo, Chuang Cheng, Weiping Yan, Guanghui Xu, Jinzhou Feng, Tianzhu Wang, Cindy Si Chen, Xinyue Qin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4193735?pdf=render
id doaj-1e7f3779bf7b43379bc9d61a0b8571e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1e7f3779bf7b43379bc9d61a0b8571e22020-11-25T02:22:09ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01910e10676210.1371/journal.pone.0106762Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines related to multiple sclerosis.Jia GuoChuang ChengWeiping YanGuanghui XuJinzhou FengTianzhu WangCindy Si ChenXinyue QinBACKGROUND: High quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can provide clinicians with explicit recommendations on how to manage health conditions and bridge the gap between research and clinical practice. Unfortunately, the quality of CPGs for multiple sclerosis (MS) has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the methodological quality of CPGs on MS using the AGREE II instrument. METHODS: According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we searched four databases and two websites related to CPGs, including the Cochrane library, PubMed, EMBASE, DynaMed, the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), and Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM). The searches were performed on September 20th 2013. All CPGs on MS were evaluated by the AGREE II instrument. The software used for analysis was SPSS 17.0. RESULTS: A total of 27 CPGs on MS met inclusion criteria. The overall agreement among reviews was good or substantial (ICC was above 0.70). The mean scores for each of all six domains were presented as follows: scope and purpose (mean ± SD: 59.05 ± 16.13), stakeholder involvement (mean ± SD: 29.53 ± 17.67), rigor of development (mean ± SD: 31.52 ± 21.50), clarity of presentation (mean ± SD: 60.39 ± 13.73), applicability (mean ± SD: 27.08 ± 17.66), editorial independence (mean ± SD: 28.70 ± 22.03). CONCLUSIONS: The methodological quality of CPGs for MS was acceptable for scope, purpose and clarity of presentation. The developers of CPGs need to pay more attention to editorial independence, applicability, rigor of development and stakeholder involvement during the development process. The AGREE II instrument should be adopted by guideline developers.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4193735?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jia Guo
Chuang Cheng
Weiping Yan
Guanghui Xu
Jinzhou Feng
Tianzhu Wang
Cindy Si Chen
Xinyue Qin
spellingShingle Jia Guo
Chuang Cheng
Weiping Yan
Guanghui Xu
Jinzhou Feng
Tianzhu Wang
Cindy Si Chen
Xinyue Qin
Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines related to multiple sclerosis.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jia Guo
Chuang Cheng
Weiping Yan
Guanghui Xu
Jinzhou Feng
Tianzhu Wang
Cindy Si Chen
Xinyue Qin
author_sort Jia Guo
title Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines related to multiple sclerosis.
title_short Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines related to multiple sclerosis.
title_full Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines related to multiple sclerosis.
title_fullStr Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines related to multiple sclerosis.
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines related to multiple sclerosis.
title_sort systematic review of clinical practice guidelines related to multiple sclerosis.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description BACKGROUND: High quality clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) can provide clinicians with explicit recommendations on how to manage health conditions and bridge the gap between research and clinical practice. Unfortunately, the quality of CPGs for multiple sclerosis (MS) has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the methodological quality of CPGs on MS using the AGREE II instrument. METHODS: According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, we searched four databases and two websites related to CPGs, including the Cochrane library, PubMed, EMBASE, DynaMed, the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC), and Chinese Biomedical Literature database (CBM). The searches were performed on September 20th 2013. All CPGs on MS were evaluated by the AGREE II instrument. The software used for analysis was SPSS 17.0. RESULTS: A total of 27 CPGs on MS met inclusion criteria. The overall agreement among reviews was good or substantial (ICC was above 0.70). The mean scores for each of all six domains were presented as follows: scope and purpose (mean ± SD: 59.05 ± 16.13), stakeholder involvement (mean ± SD: 29.53 ± 17.67), rigor of development (mean ± SD: 31.52 ± 21.50), clarity of presentation (mean ± SD: 60.39 ± 13.73), applicability (mean ± SD: 27.08 ± 17.66), editorial independence (mean ± SD: 28.70 ± 22.03). CONCLUSIONS: The methodological quality of CPGs for MS was acceptable for scope, purpose and clarity of presentation. The developers of CPGs need to pay more attention to editorial independence, applicability, rigor of development and stakeholder involvement during the development process. The AGREE II instrument should be adopted by guideline developers.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4193735?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jiaguo systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesrelatedtomultiplesclerosis
AT chuangcheng systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesrelatedtomultiplesclerosis
AT weipingyan systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesrelatedtomultiplesclerosis
AT guanghuixu systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesrelatedtomultiplesclerosis
AT jinzhoufeng systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesrelatedtomultiplesclerosis
AT tianzhuwang systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesrelatedtomultiplesclerosis
AT cindysichen systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesrelatedtomultiplesclerosis
AT xinyueqin systematicreviewofclinicalpracticeguidelinesrelatedtomultiplesclerosis
_version_ 1724863010657271808