Separate and Simultaneous Adjustment of Light Qualities in a Real Scene

Humans are able to estimate light field properties in a scene in that they have expectations of the objects’ appearance inside it. Previously, we probed such expectations in a real scene by asking whether a “probe object” fitted a real scene with regard to its lighting. But how well are observers ab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ling Xia, Sylvia C. Pont, Ingrid Heynderick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-01-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516686089
id doaj-1ecb2eb3930848598a3bbd55e67f4ccf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1ecb2eb3930848598a3bbd55e67f4ccf2020-11-25T03:15:02ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952017-01-01810.1177/2041669516686089Separate and Simultaneous Adjustment of Light Qualities in a Real SceneLing XiaSylvia C. PontIngrid HeynderickHumans are able to estimate light field properties in a scene in that they have expectations of the objects’ appearance inside it. Previously, we probed such expectations in a real scene by asking whether a “probe object” fitted a real scene with regard to its lighting. But how well are observers able to interactively adjust the light properties on a “probe object” to its surrounding real scene? Image ambiguities can result in perceptual interactions between light properties. Such interactions formed a major problem for the “readability” of the illumination direction and diffuseness on a matte smooth spherical probe. We found that light direction and diffuseness judgments using a rough sphere as probe were slightly more accurate than when using a smooth sphere, due to the three-dimensional (3D) texture. We here extended the previous work by testing independent and simultaneous (i.e., the light field properties separated one by one or blended together) adjustments of light intensity, direction, and diffuseness using a rough probe. Independently inferred light intensities were close to the veridical values, and the simultaneously inferred light intensity interacted somewhat with the light direction and diffuseness. The independently inferred light directions showed no statistical difference with the simultaneously inferred directions. The light diffuseness inferences correlated with but contracted around medium veridical values. In summary, observers were able to adjust the basic light properties through both independent and simultaneous adjustments. The light intensity, direction, and diffuseness are well “readable” from our rough probe. Our method allows “tuning the light” (adjustment of its spatial distribution) in interfaces for lighting design or perception research.https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516686089
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ling Xia
Sylvia C. Pont
Ingrid Heynderick
spellingShingle Ling Xia
Sylvia C. Pont
Ingrid Heynderick
Separate and Simultaneous Adjustment of Light Qualities in a Real Scene
i-Perception
author_facet Ling Xia
Sylvia C. Pont
Ingrid Heynderick
author_sort Ling Xia
title Separate and Simultaneous Adjustment of Light Qualities in a Real Scene
title_short Separate and Simultaneous Adjustment of Light Qualities in a Real Scene
title_full Separate and Simultaneous Adjustment of Light Qualities in a Real Scene
title_fullStr Separate and Simultaneous Adjustment of Light Qualities in a Real Scene
title_full_unstemmed Separate and Simultaneous Adjustment of Light Qualities in a Real Scene
title_sort separate and simultaneous adjustment of light qualities in a real scene
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Humans are able to estimate light field properties in a scene in that they have expectations of the objects’ appearance inside it. Previously, we probed such expectations in a real scene by asking whether a “probe object” fitted a real scene with regard to its lighting. But how well are observers able to interactively adjust the light properties on a “probe object” to its surrounding real scene? Image ambiguities can result in perceptual interactions between light properties. Such interactions formed a major problem for the “readability” of the illumination direction and diffuseness on a matte smooth spherical probe. We found that light direction and diffuseness judgments using a rough sphere as probe were slightly more accurate than when using a smooth sphere, due to the three-dimensional (3D) texture. We here extended the previous work by testing independent and simultaneous (i.e., the light field properties separated one by one or blended together) adjustments of light intensity, direction, and diffuseness using a rough probe. Independently inferred light intensities were close to the veridical values, and the simultaneously inferred light intensity interacted somewhat with the light direction and diffuseness. The independently inferred light directions showed no statistical difference with the simultaneously inferred directions. The light diffuseness inferences correlated with but contracted around medium veridical values. In summary, observers were able to adjust the basic light properties through both independent and simultaneous adjustments. The light intensity, direction, and diffuseness are well “readable” from our rough probe. Our method allows “tuning the light” (adjustment of its spatial distribution) in interfaces for lighting design or perception research.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669516686089
work_keys_str_mv AT lingxia separateandsimultaneousadjustmentoflightqualitiesinarealscene
AT sylviacpont separateandsimultaneousadjustmentoflightqualitiesinarealscene
AT ingridheynderick separateandsimultaneousadjustmentoflightqualitiesinarealscene
_version_ 1724640948142473216