Public pastoral leaders: The purpose of theological training

This article is a follow-up of an article in which I attempted to gain insight into the corporate nature of being called to ministry. The mentioned article was also aimed at discerning the specifics of the ministry of the “public pastoral leader”. While the question is even asked whether theolo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: M. Malan Nel
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: AOSIS 2005-07-01
Series:In die Skriflig
Subjects:
Online Access:https://indieskriflig.org.za/index.php/skriflig/article/view/397
id doaj-1f69e257512b45da83f66902c14066a2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1f69e257512b45da83f66902c14066a22020-11-24T23:24:14ZafrAOSISIn die Skriflig1018-64412305-08532005-07-0139344146210.4102/ids.v39i3.397292Public pastoral leaders: The purpose of theological trainingM. Malan Nel0Centre for Contextual Ministry, Faculty of Theology, University of PretoriaThis article is a follow-up of an article in which I attempted to gain insight into the corporate nature of being called to ministry. The mentioned article was also aimed at discerning the specifics of the ministry of the “public pastoral leader”. While the question is even asked whether theological training is necessary at all, I accept, as point of departure, the critical need for such training. What is of more importance is the discernment of what I call in this article the “teleological core” of theological education. I purposefully chose to explore the contributions of a number of well-known scholars who devoted much of their research to this field: Schner, Farley, Wood, Hough and Cobb, Heitink, Van der Ven and a few others. The ultimate finding is that some consensus about the telos of theological education does exist. The nature of the telos is phrased differently, but the different dimensions identified are indeed complementary. Concepts like “vision and discernment”, “critical reflection” “reflective practitioner”, “hermeneutical-communicative com- petence” and others are discussed as they relate to the core research problem. Attention is also given to the necessity of training a “basic pastor” as well as to the importance of “limited specialisation” in theological training.https://indieskriflig.org.za/index.php/skriflig/article/view/397Pastoral LeaderReflective ThinkingTheological TrainingVision And Discernment
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Malan Nel
spellingShingle M. Malan Nel
Public pastoral leaders: The purpose of theological training
In die Skriflig
Pastoral Leader
Reflective Thinking
Theological Training
Vision And Discernment
author_facet M. Malan Nel
author_sort M. Malan Nel
title Public pastoral leaders: The purpose of theological training
title_short Public pastoral leaders: The purpose of theological training
title_full Public pastoral leaders: The purpose of theological training
title_fullStr Public pastoral leaders: The purpose of theological training
title_full_unstemmed Public pastoral leaders: The purpose of theological training
title_sort public pastoral leaders: the purpose of theological training
publisher AOSIS
series In die Skriflig
issn 1018-6441
2305-0853
publishDate 2005-07-01
description This article is a follow-up of an article in which I attempted to gain insight into the corporate nature of being called to ministry. The mentioned article was also aimed at discerning the specifics of the ministry of the “public pastoral leader”. While the question is even asked whether theological training is necessary at all, I accept, as point of departure, the critical need for such training. What is of more importance is the discernment of what I call in this article the “teleological core” of theological education. I purposefully chose to explore the contributions of a number of well-known scholars who devoted much of their research to this field: Schner, Farley, Wood, Hough and Cobb, Heitink, Van der Ven and a few others. The ultimate finding is that some consensus about the telos of theological education does exist. The nature of the telos is phrased differently, but the different dimensions identified are indeed complementary. Concepts like “vision and discernment”, “critical reflection” “reflective practitioner”, “hermeneutical-communicative com- petence” and others are discussed as they relate to the core research problem. Attention is also given to the necessity of training a “basic pastor” as well as to the importance of “limited specialisation” in theological training.
topic Pastoral Leader
Reflective Thinking
Theological Training
Vision And Discernment
url https://indieskriflig.org.za/index.php/skriflig/article/view/397
work_keys_str_mv AT mmalannel publicpastoralleadersthepurposeoftheologicaltraining
_version_ 1725561172843823104