Survival outcomes of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiotherapy in clinically localized high-risk prostate cancer: a population-based, propensity score matched study

• Main Authors: Gu X, Gao X, Cui M, Xie M, Ma M, Qin S, Li X, Qi X, Bai Y, Wang D
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dove Medical Press 2018-05-01
• Series: Cancer Management and Research
• Subjects: prostate cancer; SEER; radical prostatectomy; EBRT
• Online Access: https://www.dovepress.com/survival-outcomes-of-radical-prostatectomy-and-external-beam-radiother-peer-reviewed-article-CMAR

Xiaobin Gu,1 Xianshu Gao,1 Ming Cui,1 Mu Xie,1 Mingwei Ma,1 Shangbin Qin,1 Xiaoying Li,1 Xin Qi,1 Yun Bai,1 Dian Wang2 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA Objective: This study was aimed to compare survival outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients receiving external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or radical prostatectomy (RP). Materials and methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify PCa patients with high-risk features who received RP alone or EBRT alone from 2004 to 2008. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to compare cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors. Results: A total of 24,293 patients were identified, 14,460 patients receiving RP and 9833 patients receiving EBRT. Through PSM, 3828 patients were identified in each group. The mean CSS was 128.6 and 126.7 months for RP and EBRT groups, respectively (P<0.001). The subgroup analyses showed that CSS of the RP group was better than that of the EBRT group for patients aged <65 years (P<0.001), White race (P<0.001), and married status (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in CSS for patients aged ≥65 years, Black race, other race, and unmarried status. Similar trends were observed for OS. Multivariate analysis showed that EBRT treatment modality, T3–T4 stage, Gleason score 8–10, and prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL were significant risk factors for both CSS and OS. Conclusion: This study suggested that survival outcomes might be better with RP than EBRT in high-risk PCa patients aged <65 years; however, RP and EBRT provided equivalent survival outcomes in older patients, which argues for primary radiotherapy in this older cohort. Keywords: prostate cancer, SEER, radical prostatectomy, EBRT