An Integrated Dynamical Modeling Perspective for Infrastructure Resilience
This paper considers a dynamical way to connect resilience outcomes and processes by nesting process-based approaches inside a controlled dynamical system under resource constraints. To illustrate this, we use a dynamical model of electric power generation to show the complementary aspects of outcom...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2018-05-01
|
Series: | Infrastructures |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/3/2/11 |
id |
doaj-1f83c8f08389472eaed3b5959fb3ce55 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1f83c8f08389472eaed3b5959fb3ce552020-11-24T22:18:13ZengMDPI AGInfrastructures2412-38112018-05-01321110.3390/infrastructures3020011infrastructures3020011An Integrated Dynamical Modeling Perspective for Infrastructure ResilienceJean-Denis Mathias0Susan Spierre Clark1Nuri Onat2Thomas P. Seager3IRSTEA, UR LISC, 9 Avenue Blaise Pascal, 63170 Aubiere, FranceRENEW Institute, 108 Cooke Hall, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260-1660, USAQatar Transportation and Traffic Safety Center, College of Engineering, Qatar University, Doha, QatarSchool of Sustainable Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USAThis paper considers a dynamical way to connect resilience outcomes and processes by nesting process-based approaches inside a controlled dynamical system under resource constraints. To illustrate this, we use a dynamical model of electric power generation to show the complementary aspects of outcome, resources, and process-based approaches for analyzing infrastructure resilience. The results of this stylized model show that adaptation is the most influential process and that for monitoring to be efficient it must account for associated costs. Beyond these specific results, we suggest that nesting outcome- and process-based approaches within a dynamical controlled framework can be very useful and complementary for infrastructure managers and designers tasked with effectively allocating resources for enhancing system resilience.http://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/3/2/11resilienceinfrastructuredynamical controlled systemoutcomeprocessresourcespower system |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jean-Denis Mathias Susan Spierre Clark Nuri Onat Thomas P. Seager |
spellingShingle |
Jean-Denis Mathias Susan Spierre Clark Nuri Onat Thomas P. Seager An Integrated Dynamical Modeling Perspective for Infrastructure Resilience Infrastructures resilience infrastructure dynamical controlled system outcome process resources power system |
author_facet |
Jean-Denis Mathias Susan Spierre Clark Nuri Onat Thomas P. Seager |
author_sort |
Jean-Denis Mathias |
title |
An Integrated Dynamical Modeling Perspective for Infrastructure Resilience |
title_short |
An Integrated Dynamical Modeling Perspective for Infrastructure Resilience |
title_full |
An Integrated Dynamical Modeling Perspective for Infrastructure Resilience |
title_fullStr |
An Integrated Dynamical Modeling Perspective for Infrastructure Resilience |
title_full_unstemmed |
An Integrated Dynamical Modeling Perspective for Infrastructure Resilience |
title_sort |
integrated dynamical modeling perspective for infrastructure resilience |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Infrastructures |
issn |
2412-3811 |
publishDate |
2018-05-01 |
description |
This paper considers a dynamical way to connect resilience outcomes and processes by nesting process-based approaches inside a controlled dynamical system under resource constraints. To illustrate this, we use a dynamical model of electric power generation to show the complementary aspects of outcome, resources, and process-based approaches for analyzing infrastructure resilience. The results of this stylized model show that adaptation is the most influential process and that for monitoring to be efficient it must account for associated costs. Beyond these specific results, we suggest that nesting outcome- and process-based approaches within a dynamical controlled framework can be very useful and complementary for infrastructure managers and designers tasked with effectively allocating resources for enhancing system resilience. |
topic |
resilience infrastructure dynamical controlled system outcome process resources power system |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/3/2/11 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jeandenismathias anintegrateddynamicalmodelingperspectiveforinfrastructureresilience AT susanspierreclark anintegrateddynamicalmodelingperspectiveforinfrastructureresilience AT nurionat anintegrateddynamicalmodelingperspectiveforinfrastructureresilience AT thomaspseager anintegrateddynamicalmodelingperspectiveforinfrastructureresilience AT jeandenismathias integrateddynamicalmodelingperspectiveforinfrastructureresilience AT susanspierreclark integrateddynamicalmodelingperspectiveforinfrastructureresilience AT nurionat integrateddynamicalmodelingperspectiveforinfrastructureresilience AT thomaspseager integrateddynamicalmodelingperspectiveforinfrastructureresilience |
_version_ |
1725782747316748288 |