THE EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL STRESSES ON THE COMPARATIVE MICROLEAKAGE OF TWO DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE MATERIALS

ABSTRACT Objectives: To assess the effects of lateral mechanical stresses on the microleakage of resin modified glass ionomer and polyacids modified composites. Study design and settings: It was a comparative cross sectional study carried out jointly by Department of Dental Materials, Nishtar Insti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naghma Parveen, Bilal Ahmed
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Faisalabad 2012-06-01
Series:Journal of University Medical & Dental College
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jumdc.com/index.php/jumdc/article/view/347
id doaj-1f8410a682894ae3a17e00cc9e174d4e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1f8410a682894ae3a17e00cc9e174d4e2020-11-25T02:55:07ZengUniversity of FaisalabadJournal of University Medical & Dental College2221-78272310-55422012-06-0131THE EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL STRESSES ON THE COMPARATIVE MICROLEAKAGE OF TWO DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE MATERIALS Naghma Parveen0Bilal Ahmed1Associate Professor, Nishtar Institute of Dentistry, MultanAssistant Professor, University Medical & Dental College, Faisalabad ABSTRACT Objectives: To assess the effects of lateral mechanical stresses on the microleakage of resin modified glass ionomer and polyacids modified composites. Study design and settings: It was a comparative cross sectional study carried out jointly by Department of Dental Materials, Nishtar Institute of Dentistry, Multan and Department of Dental Materials, University Medical & Dental College, Faisalabad. Materials and methods: Fifty healthy, unrestored, extracted premolar teeth were collected and then randomly divided into two groups. Class V cavities were prepared at the cemento-enamel junctions and these teeth were restored with Fuji II.LC (GC America) and Dyract (Dentsply), 25 teeth in each group. Teeth from each group were subjected to 8400 cycle of lateral fatigue forces (49 N) at the occlusal half of the clinical crown in a machine. All the teeth were placed in 2% basic fuchsin dye for 24 hrs at 37°C. Teeth were then embedded in cold cure acrylic resin, sectioned longitudinally in–ISOMETA, and the dye penetration at the enamel and cementum margin were scored at 10 X magnification Stereo microscope. Results: Distinct leakage patterns were recorded. There was very little difference between the microleakage score of two materials at their incisal margins. But microleakage difference was greater for these two materials on gingival margins of these restorations, where Dyract showing better results. Conclusion: Among these two materials tested, Dyract showed lesser microleakage than Fuji II.LC. http://jumdc.com/index.php/jumdc/article/view/347Mechanical stressesrestorative materialsmicroleakagedental materials
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Naghma Parveen
Bilal Ahmed
spellingShingle Naghma Parveen
Bilal Ahmed
THE EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL STRESSES ON THE COMPARATIVE MICROLEAKAGE OF TWO DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
Journal of University Medical & Dental College
Mechanical stresses
restorative materials
microleakage
dental materials
author_facet Naghma Parveen
Bilal Ahmed
author_sort Naghma Parveen
title THE EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL STRESSES ON THE COMPARATIVE MICROLEAKAGE OF TWO DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
title_short THE EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL STRESSES ON THE COMPARATIVE MICROLEAKAGE OF TWO DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
title_full THE EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL STRESSES ON THE COMPARATIVE MICROLEAKAGE OF TWO DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
title_fullStr THE EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL STRESSES ON THE COMPARATIVE MICROLEAKAGE OF TWO DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
title_full_unstemmed THE EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL STRESSES ON THE COMPARATIVE MICROLEAKAGE OF TWO DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
title_sort effects of mechanical stresses on the comparative microleakage of two different restorative materials
publisher University of Faisalabad
series Journal of University Medical & Dental College
issn 2221-7827
2310-5542
publishDate 2012-06-01
description ABSTRACT Objectives: To assess the effects of lateral mechanical stresses on the microleakage of resin modified glass ionomer and polyacids modified composites. Study design and settings: It was a comparative cross sectional study carried out jointly by Department of Dental Materials, Nishtar Institute of Dentistry, Multan and Department of Dental Materials, University Medical & Dental College, Faisalabad. Materials and methods: Fifty healthy, unrestored, extracted premolar teeth were collected and then randomly divided into two groups. Class V cavities were prepared at the cemento-enamel junctions and these teeth were restored with Fuji II.LC (GC America) and Dyract (Dentsply), 25 teeth in each group. Teeth from each group were subjected to 8400 cycle of lateral fatigue forces (49 N) at the occlusal half of the clinical crown in a machine. All the teeth were placed in 2% basic fuchsin dye for 24 hrs at 37°C. Teeth were then embedded in cold cure acrylic resin, sectioned longitudinally in–ISOMETA, and the dye penetration at the enamel and cementum margin were scored at 10 X magnification Stereo microscope. Results: Distinct leakage patterns were recorded. There was very little difference between the microleakage score of two materials at their incisal margins. But microleakage difference was greater for these two materials on gingival margins of these restorations, where Dyract showing better results. Conclusion: Among these two materials tested, Dyract showed lesser microleakage than Fuji II.LC.
topic Mechanical stresses
restorative materials
microleakage
dental materials
url http://jumdc.com/index.php/jumdc/article/view/347
work_keys_str_mv AT naghmaparveen theeffectsofmechanicalstressesonthecomparativemicroleakageoftwodifferentrestorativematerials
AT bilalahmed theeffectsofmechanicalstressesonthecomparativemicroleakageoftwodifferentrestorativematerials
AT naghmaparveen effectsofmechanicalstressesonthecomparativemicroleakageoftwodifferentrestorativematerials
AT bilalahmed effectsofmechanicalstressesonthecomparativemicroleakageoftwodifferentrestorativematerials
_version_ 1724718167787307008