A rasch-based validity study of the HSCL-25

Background: The Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) is a commonly used questionnaire to assess anxiety and depression in trauma-affected refugees. Despite numerous studies evaluating criterion validity and reliability, few studies have assessed the construct validity of the scale. Methods: In the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erik Vindbjerg, Erik Lykke Mortensen, Guido Makransky, Tine Nielsen, Jessica Carlsson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-04-01
Series:Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915321000238
id doaj-1fd86c8ba10c41c5b142d48a800e7889
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1fd86c8ba10c41c5b142d48a800e78892021-04-22T13:42:29ZengElsevierJournal of Affective Disorders Reports2666-91532021-04-014100096A rasch-based validity study of the HSCL-25Erik Vindbjerg0Erik Lykke Mortensen1Guido Makransky2Tine Nielsen3Jessica Carlsson4Competence Centre for Transcultural Psychiatry, Mental Health Centre Ballerup, Copenhagen, Denmark; Corresponding author.Department of Public Health and Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkUCL University College, Department of Applied Research in Education and Social Sciences, Odense, DenmarkCompetence Centre for Transcultural Psychiatry, Mental Health Centre Ballerup, Copenhagen, DenmarkBackground: The Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) is a commonly used questionnaire to assess anxiety and depression in trauma-affected refugees. Despite numerous studies evaluating criterion validity and reliability, few studies have assessed the construct validity of the scale. Methods: In the current study, a Rasch analysis was carried out based on responses from 635 Arabic and Persian speaking refugees. Results supported the use of an eight- or nine-item anxiety subscale score. Results: The anxiety subscale fit the Rasch model with limited modifications, including the exclusion of purely somatic items. Results for the depression subscale revealed a range of issues. While a shortened scale which accounted for gender differences allowed for a fit with the Persian speaking sample, no fit could be obtained for the Arabic speaking sample. We discuss whether more flexible psychometric models may be necessary to derive valid estimates of depression in some cultures. Limitations: Both constructs studied, anxiety and depression, were comorbid to PTSD in the included sample. Most respondents were chronically affected and often troubled by extensive post-settlement stress. Results may not generalize to other populations, e.g. non-refugees or more recently arrived refugees. Conclusions: Purely somatic items have no clear place in the HSCL-25 anxiety subscale, while the anxiety items show good potential to fit a Rasch model. The HSCL-25 depression subscale may not be suitable for summating a single total score, reflecting the need for either a simpler scale or a more complex approach to assessing responses.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915321000238Rasch analysisItem response theoryRefugeesTransculturalAnxietyDepression
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erik Vindbjerg
Erik Lykke Mortensen
Guido Makransky
Tine Nielsen
Jessica Carlsson
spellingShingle Erik Vindbjerg
Erik Lykke Mortensen
Guido Makransky
Tine Nielsen
Jessica Carlsson
A rasch-based validity study of the HSCL-25
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
Rasch analysis
Item response theory
Refugees
Transcultural
Anxiety
Depression
author_facet Erik Vindbjerg
Erik Lykke Mortensen
Guido Makransky
Tine Nielsen
Jessica Carlsson
author_sort Erik Vindbjerg
title A rasch-based validity study of the HSCL-25
title_short A rasch-based validity study of the HSCL-25
title_full A rasch-based validity study of the HSCL-25
title_fullStr A rasch-based validity study of the HSCL-25
title_full_unstemmed A rasch-based validity study of the HSCL-25
title_sort rasch-based validity study of the hscl-25
publisher Elsevier
series Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
issn 2666-9153
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Background: The Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) is a commonly used questionnaire to assess anxiety and depression in trauma-affected refugees. Despite numerous studies evaluating criterion validity and reliability, few studies have assessed the construct validity of the scale. Methods: In the current study, a Rasch analysis was carried out based on responses from 635 Arabic and Persian speaking refugees. Results supported the use of an eight- or nine-item anxiety subscale score. Results: The anxiety subscale fit the Rasch model with limited modifications, including the exclusion of purely somatic items. Results for the depression subscale revealed a range of issues. While a shortened scale which accounted for gender differences allowed for a fit with the Persian speaking sample, no fit could be obtained for the Arabic speaking sample. We discuss whether more flexible psychometric models may be necessary to derive valid estimates of depression in some cultures. Limitations: Both constructs studied, anxiety and depression, were comorbid to PTSD in the included sample. Most respondents were chronically affected and often troubled by extensive post-settlement stress. Results may not generalize to other populations, e.g. non-refugees or more recently arrived refugees. Conclusions: Purely somatic items have no clear place in the HSCL-25 anxiety subscale, while the anxiety items show good potential to fit a Rasch model. The HSCL-25 depression subscale may not be suitable for summating a single total score, reflecting the need for either a simpler scale or a more complex approach to assessing responses.
topic Rasch analysis
Item response theory
Refugees
Transcultural
Anxiety
Depression
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666915321000238
work_keys_str_mv AT erikvindbjerg araschbasedvaliditystudyofthehscl25
AT eriklykkemortensen araschbasedvaliditystudyofthehscl25
AT guidomakransky araschbasedvaliditystudyofthehscl25
AT tinenielsen araschbasedvaliditystudyofthehscl25
AT jessicacarlsson araschbasedvaliditystudyofthehscl25
AT erikvindbjerg raschbasedvaliditystudyofthehscl25
AT eriklykkemortensen raschbasedvaliditystudyofthehscl25
AT guidomakransky raschbasedvaliditystudyofthehscl25
AT tinenielsen raschbasedvaliditystudyofthehscl25
AT jessicacarlsson raschbasedvaliditystudyofthehscl25
_version_ 1721514099619135488