Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?
Eavesdropping is the acquisition of information by observing third-party interactions. Considering dogs' (Canis lupus familiaris) dependence on humans, it would be beneficial for them to eavesdrop on human interactions to choose an appropriate partner to associate with. Previous studies have fo...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237373 |
id |
doaj-1fe2296dccac440081208f3d6ad4440c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-1fe2296dccac440081208f3d6ad4440c2021-03-04T11:14:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01158e023737310.1371/journal.pone.0237373Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?Hoi-Lam JimSarah Marshall-PesciniFriederike RangeEavesdropping is the acquisition of information by observing third-party interactions. Considering dogs' (Canis lupus familiaris) dependence on humans, it would be beneficial for them to eavesdrop on human interactions to choose an appropriate partner to associate with. Previous studies have found that dogs preferred a human who acted generously or cooperatively towards another human over one who acted selfishly or non-cooperatively, however they often did not control for potential location biases. This study controlled for local enhancement and investigated whether dogs derive and act on information about unfamiliar humans through reputation-like inferences by observing third-party interactions. 42 dogs participated in the experiment, which consisted of an observation phase and a test phase. In the observation phase, the animals observed a human with a box of food ask for help to open it from two people-one was helpful and the other was not. The test phase consisted of the impossible task and a choice test. Half of the sample was tested in the experimental condition and the other half was tested in the side control condition, where the two people swapped positions before the test phase. The results of the impossible task showed that dogs only looked at the helpful person first when the people stayed on the same side as they did in the observation phase. In the choice test, dogs chose at random, regardless of whether the people stayed on the same side or swapped positions. Our findings provide tentative support for a local enhancement interpretation of eavesdropping.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237373 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hoi-Lam Jim Sarah Marshall-Pescini Friederike Range |
spellingShingle |
Hoi-Lam Jim Sarah Marshall-Pescini Friederike Range Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation? PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Hoi-Lam Jim Sarah Marshall-Pescini Friederike Range |
author_sort |
Hoi-Lam Jim |
title |
Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation? |
title_short |
Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation? |
title_full |
Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation? |
title_fullStr |
Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation? |
title_sort |
do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation? |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Eavesdropping is the acquisition of information by observing third-party interactions. Considering dogs' (Canis lupus familiaris) dependence on humans, it would be beneficial for them to eavesdrop on human interactions to choose an appropriate partner to associate with. Previous studies have found that dogs preferred a human who acted generously or cooperatively towards another human over one who acted selfishly or non-cooperatively, however they often did not control for potential location biases. This study controlled for local enhancement and investigated whether dogs derive and act on information about unfamiliar humans through reputation-like inferences by observing third-party interactions. 42 dogs participated in the experiment, which consisted of an observation phase and a test phase. In the observation phase, the animals observed a human with a box of food ask for help to open it from two people-one was helpful and the other was not. The test phase consisted of the impossible task and a choice test. Half of the sample was tested in the experimental condition and the other half was tested in the side control condition, where the two people swapped positions before the test phase. The results of the impossible task showed that dogs only looked at the helpful person first when the people stayed on the same side as they did in the observation phase. In the choice test, dogs chose at random, regardless of whether the people stayed on the same side or swapped positions. Our findings provide tentative support for a local enhancement interpretation of eavesdropping. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237373 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hoilamjim dodogseavesdroponhumaninteractionsinahelpingsituation AT sarahmarshallpescini dodogseavesdroponhumaninteractionsinahelpingsituation AT friederikerange dodogseavesdroponhumaninteractionsinahelpingsituation |
_version_ |
1714804364092112896 |