Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?

Eavesdropping is the acquisition of information by observing third-party interactions. Considering dogs' (Canis lupus familiaris) dependence on humans, it would be beneficial for them to eavesdrop on human interactions to choose an appropriate partner to associate with. Previous studies have fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hoi-Lam Jim, Sarah Marshall-Pescini, Friederike Range
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237373
id doaj-1fe2296dccac440081208f3d6ad4440c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1fe2296dccac440081208f3d6ad4440c2021-03-04T11:14:26ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01158e023737310.1371/journal.pone.0237373Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?Hoi-Lam JimSarah Marshall-PesciniFriederike RangeEavesdropping is the acquisition of information by observing third-party interactions. Considering dogs' (Canis lupus familiaris) dependence on humans, it would be beneficial for them to eavesdrop on human interactions to choose an appropriate partner to associate with. Previous studies have found that dogs preferred a human who acted generously or cooperatively towards another human over one who acted selfishly or non-cooperatively, however they often did not control for potential location biases. This study controlled for local enhancement and investigated whether dogs derive and act on information about unfamiliar humans through reputation-like inferences by observing third-party interactions. 42 dogs participated in the experiment, which consisted of an observation phase and a test phase. In the observation phase, the animals observed a human with a box of food ask for help to open it from two people-one was helpful and the other was not. The test phase consisted of the impossible task and a choice test. Half of the sample was tested in the experimental condition and the other half was tested in the side control condition, where the two people swapped positions before the test phase. The results of the impossible task showed that dogs only looked at the helpful person first when the people stayed on the same side as they did in the observation phase. In the choice test, dogs chose at random, regardless of whether the people stayed on the same side or swapped positions. Our findings provide tentative support for a local enhancement interpretation of eavesdropping.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237373
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hoi-Lam Jim
Sarah Marshall-Pescini
Friederike Range
spellingShingle Hoi-Lam Jim
Sarah Marshall-Pescini
Friederike Range
Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Hoi-Lam Jim
Sarah Marshall-Pescini
Friederike Range
author_sort Hoi-Lam Jim
title Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?
title_short Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?
title_full Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?
title_fullStr Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?
title_full_unstemmed Do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?
title_sort do dogs eavesdrop on human interactions in a helping situation?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Eavesdropping is the acquisition of information by observing third-party interactions. Considering dogs' (Canis lupus familiaris) dependence on humans, it would be beneficial for them to eavesdrop on human interactions to choose an appropriate partner to associate with. Previous studies have found that dogs preferred a human who acted generously or cooperatively towards another human over one who acted selfishly or non-cooperatively, however they often did not control for potential location biases. This study controlled for local enhancement and investigated whether dogs derive and act on information about unfamiliar humans through reputation-like inferences by observing third-party interactions. 42 dogs participated in the experiment, which consisted of an observation phase and a test phase. In the observation phase, the animals observed a human with a box of food ask for help to open it from two people-one was helpful and the other was not. The test phase consisted of the impossible task and a choice test. Half of the sample was tested in the experimental condition and the other half was tested in the side control condition, where the two people swapped positions before the test phase. The results of the impossible task showed that dogs only looked at the helpful person first when the people stayed on the same side as they did in the observation phase. In the choice test, dogs chose at random, regardless of whether the people stayed on the same side or swapped positions. Our findings provide tentative support for a local enhancement interpretation of eavesdropping.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237373
work_keys_str_mv AT hoilamjim dodogseavesdroponhumaninteractionsinahelpingsituation
AT sarahmarshallpescini dodogseavesdroponhumaninteractionsinahelpingsituation
AT friederikerange dodogseavesdroponhumaninteractionsinahelpingsituation
_version_ 1714804364092112896