Ethical Aspect in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Iran

Background:Gastroenterologists are required to obtain consent before undertaking any endoscopic examination.Published data indicate that in practice there are many deficiencies in this process.The aim of this survey was to determine the quality of information given to patients before the endoscopic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohsen Masoodi, Seyed Hamid Moosavy, Hosein Froutan, Yasir Andrabi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2010-05-01
Series:Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran
Subjects:
Online Access:http://mjiri.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-88&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-1fe4ad41b7454fc9b3d58b8c0b909063
record_format Article
spelling doaj-1fe4ad41b7454fc9b3d58b8c0b9090632020-11-24T21:52:40ZengIran University of Medical SciencesMedical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran1016-14302251-68402010-05-0124114Ethical Aspect in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in IranMohsen MasoodiSeyed Hamid MoosavyHosein FroutanYasir AndrabiBackground:Gastroenterologists are required to obtain consent before undertaking any endoscopic examination.Published data indicate that in practice there are many deficiencies in this process.The aim of this survey was to determine the quality of information given to patients before the endoscopic procedures in Iran.Methods:A structured questionnaire about patient's informed consent before endoscopy was used.In the 3rd Iranian international congress of gastroenterology and hepatology ,100 endoscopists (gastroenterologist or internist)participated in this study regarding the quality of informed consent.Results: 90% of these physicians were male and 57% of them worked in Tehran (capital of Iran). The distribution of positive answers were as follow :Detailed information regarding the nature of the endoscopic procedure provided to the   patient, 91%; the sufficient time to ask questions about the nature of the procedure, 82% ; alternative diagnostic tests or treatment explained to the patient,73%; patient informed about the possible complications of the proposed procedure, 32%; the patient informed about the mortality rate of the proposed endoscopic procedure, 15%.   Conclusion: Although information about the procedure is given to the patients in 91% of the procedure,endoscopic practice must respect the ethical aspects of medicine and more attention need to be paid to informed consent and patient's information, especially   about potential procedure- related complication and mortality.  http://mjiri.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-88&slc_lang=en&sid=1EthicsEndoscopyGastroenterology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohsen Masoodi
Seyed Hamid Moosavy
Hosein Froutan
Yasir Andrabi
spellingShingle Mohsen Masoodi
Seyed Hamid Moosavy
Hosein Froutan
Yasir Andrabi
Ethical Aspect in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Iran
Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran
Ethics
Endoscopy
Gastroenterology
author_facet Mohsen Masoodi
Seyed Hamid Moosavy
Hosein Froutan
Yasir Andrabi
author_sort Mohsen Masoodi
title Ethical Aspect in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Iran
title_short Ethical Aspect in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Iran
title_full Ethical Aspect in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Iran
title_fullStr Ethical Aspect in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Iran
title_full_unstemmed Ethical Aspect in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Iran
title_sort ethical aspect in gastrointestinal endoscopy in iran
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
series Medical Journal of The Islamic Republic of Iran
issn 1016-1430
2251-6840
publishDate 2010-05-01
description Background:Gastroenterologists are required to obtain consent before undertaking any endoscopic examination.Published data indicate that in practice there are many deficiencies in this process.The aim of this survey was to determine the quality of information given to patients before the endoscopic procedures in Iran.Methods:A structured questionnaire about patient's informed consent before endoscopy was used.In the 3rd Iranian international congress of gastroenterology and hepatology ,100 endoscopists (gastroenterologist or internist)participated in this study regarding the quality of informed consent.Results: 90% of these physicians were male and 57% of them worked in Tehran (capital of Iran). The distribution of positive answers were as follow :Detailed information regarding the nature of the endoscopic procedure provided to the   patient, 91%; the sufficient time to ask questions about the nature of the procedure, 82% ; alternative diagnostic tests or treatment explained to the patient,73%; patient informed about the possible complications of the proposed procedure, 32%; the patient informed about the mortality rate of the proposed endoscopic procedure, 15%.   Conclusion: Although information about the procedure is given to the patients in 91% of the procedure,endoscopic practice must respect the ethical aspects of medicine and more attention need to be paid to informed consent and patient's information, especially   about potential procedure- related complication and mortality.  
topic Ethics
Endoscopy
Gastroenterology
url http://mjiri.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1-88&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT mohsenmasoodi ethicalaspectingastrointestinalendoscopyiniran
AT seyedhamidmoosavy ethicalaspectingastrointestinalendoscopyiniran
AT hoseinfroutan ethicalaspectingastrointestinalendoscopyiniran
AT yasirandrabi ethicalaspectingastrointestinalendoscopyiniran
_version_ 1725875375540535296