Differential barrier and corridor effects of power lines, roads and rivers on moose (Alces alces) movements

Building new power lines is required to satisfy increasing demands for the transmission of electricity, and at the same time the road network is expanding. To provide guidelines for the routing of new power lines and roads, it is essential to test whether linear features deter or attract movements o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G. S. Bartzke, R. May, E. J. Solberg, C. M. Rolandsen, E. Røskaft
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2015-04-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00278.1
id doaj-200d39d6690644618423c97507662d91
record_format Article
spelling doaj-200d39d6690644618423c97507662d912020-11-25T02:36:30ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252015-04-016411710.1890/ES14-00278.1Differential barrier and corridor effects of power lines, roads and rivers on moose (Alces alces) movementsG. S. Bartzke0R. May1E. J. Solberg2C. M. Rolandsen3E. Røskaft4Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, 7485 Trondheim, NorwayNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, 7485 Trondheim, NorwayNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, 7485 Trondheim, NorwayNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, 7485 Trondheim, NorwayInstitute for Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayBuilding new power lines is required to satisfy increasing demands for the transmission of electricity, and at the same time the road network is expanding. To provide guidelines for the routing of new power lines and roads, it is essential to test whether linear features deter or attract movements of animals in different landscape settings. Using GPS relocation data from 151 moose (Alces alces L.) in central Norway, we tested for barrier and corridor effects of roads, power lines and rivers and accounted for forest cover, the topographical orientation of linear features and the placement of other nearby linear features. We predicted step selection probabilities for different movement options at varying distances from linear features and linear feature combinations. Barrier and corridor effects of linear features altered moose movements, although effects were minor compared to the effects of topography and forest cover. Moose did not avoid crossing power lines, unless the placement of power lines along contour lines impeded movements across them. In contrast, moose avoided crossing of roads and rivers in forests. Moose more likely moved along linear features when getting closer to linear features. Barrier and corridor effects were higher for road/river combinations compared to single linear features. Likewise, the barrier and corridor effects were higher for road/power line combinations, but not power line/river combinations compared to single linear features, when moose were close to the edge of those features. The inconsistent pattern could be due to the low sample size. We found indications of higher disturbance potential of roads compared to power lines and rivers. Managing vegetation in power line rights‐of‐way to provide abundant browse could counteract possible disturbance, while wildlife overpasses could mitigate road fragmentation effects.https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00278.1Alces alcesbarriercorridormoosemovementNorway
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G. S. Bartzke
R. May
E. J. Solberg
C. M. Rolandsen
E. Røskaft
spellingShingle G. S. Bartzke
R. May
E. J. Solberg
C. M. Rolandsen
E. Røskaft
Differential barrier and corridor effects of power lines, roads and rivers on moose (Alces alces) movements
Ecosphere
Alces alces
barrier
corridor
moose
movement
Norway
author_facet G. S. Bartzke
R. May
E. J. Solberg
C. M. Rolandsen
E. Røskaft
author_sort G. S. Bartzke
title Differential barrier and corridor effects of power lines, roads and rivers on moose (Alces alces) movements
title_short Differential barrier and corridor effects of power lines, roads and rivers on moose (Alces alces) movements
title_full Differential barrier and corridor effects of power lines, roads and rivers on moose (Alces alces) movements
title_fullStr Differential barrier and corridor effects of power lines, roads and rivers on moose (Alces alces) movements
title_full_unstemmed Differential barrier and corridor effects of power lines, roads and rivers on moose (Alces alces) movements
title_sort differential barrier and corridor effects of power lines, roads and rivers on moose (alces alces) movements
publisher Wiley
series Ecosphere
issn 2150-8925
publishDate 2015-04-01
description Building new power lines is required to satisfy increasing demands for the transmission of electricity, and at the same time the road network is expanding. To provide guidelines for the routing of new power lines and roads, it is essential to test whether linear features deter or attract movements of animals in different landscape settings. Using GPS relocation data from 151 moose (Alces alces L.) in central Norway, we tested for barrier and corridor effects of roads, power lines and rivers and accounted for forest cover, the topographical orientation of linear features and the placement of other nearby linear features. We predicted step selection probabilities for different movement options at varying distances from linear features and linear feature combinations. Barrier and corridor effects of linear features altered moose movements, although effects were minor compared to the effects of topography and forest cover. Moose did not avoid crossing power lines, unless the placement of power lines along contour lines impeded movements across them. In contrast, moose avoided crossing of roads and rivers in forests. Moose more likely moved along linear features when getting closer to linear features. Barrier and corridor effects were higher for road/river combinations compared to single linear features. Likewise, the barrier and corridor effects were higher for road/power line combinations, but not power line/river combinations compared to single linear features, when moose were close to the edge of those features. The inconsistent pattern could be due to the low sample size. We found indications of higher disturbance potential of roads compared to power lines and rivers. Managing vegetation in power line rights‐of‐way to provide abundant browse could counteract possible disturbance, while wildlife overpasses could mitigate road fragmentation effects.
topic Alces alces
barrier
corridor
moose
movement
Norway
url https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00278.1
work_keys_str_mv AT gsbartzke differentialbarrierandcorridoreffectsofpowerlinesroadsandriversonmoosealcesalcesmovements
AT rmay differentialbarrierandcorridoreffectsofpowerlinesroadsandriversonmoosealcesalcesmovements
AT ejsolberg differentialbarrierandcorridoreffectsofpowerlinesroadsandriversonmoosealcesalcesmovements
AT cmrolandsen differentialbarrierandcorridoreffectsofpowerlinesroadsandriversonmoosealcesalcesmovements
AT erøskaft differentialbarrierandcorridoreffectsofpowerlinesroadsandriversonmoosealcesalcesmovements
_version_ 1724799827287474176