Regulation and Deregulation from Legal Theory to the Practical Case of the Financial Sector Nowadays

The two great challenges for any authority are to what extent and how to intervene in thefunctioning of the society. These challenges originate both in the world of ideologies, defining the type ofstate or authority based on its propensity for regulation, and in the technical expertise of technocrat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bogdan Olteanu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Danubius University 2012-05-01
Series:EIRP Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1297/1181
id doaj-203150124b254fae8c566eb25bb11c1e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-203150124b254fae8c566eb25bb11c1e2020-11-24T22:40:31ZengDanubius UniversityEIRP Proceedings2067-92112069-93442012-05-0171351358Regulation and Deregulation from Legal Theory to the Practical Case of the Financial Sector NowadaysBogdan OlteanuThe two great challenges for any authority are to what extent and how to intervene in thefunctioning of the society. These challenges originate both in the world of ideologies, defining the type ofstate or authority based on its propensity for regulation, and in the technical expertise of technocraticmanagement that can identify the “good practice” and “good governance” features. Both policy sources arenecessary and legitimate. The ideological sources help support a representative mandate obtained by anelected power, being validated by citizens’ vote, while the technical ones contribute to optimising theefficiency of the public option by managing it in an appropriate manner. To set a simple example, if theideological option is in favour of maintaining a company under state ownership, then the technical optionmay be to ensure a competency-based management controlled solely according to performance criteria. Ifthe ideological option promotes the privatisation of a state-owned company, then the technical option mayseek to ensure a privatisation procedure that should maximise the public benefit (through price, othercontractual terms, enhanced market competition, clauses or measures to protect consumers, etc.)http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1297/1181managementgood practicegood governancepublic benefit
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Bogdan Olteanu
spellingShingle Bogdan Olteanu
Regulation and Deregulation from Legal Theory to the Practical Case of the Financial Sector Nowadays
EIRP Proceedings
management
good practice
good governance
public benefit
author_facet Bogdan Olteanu
author_sort Bogdan Olteanu
title Regulation and Deregulation from Legal Theory to the Practical Case of the Financial Sector Nowadays
title_short Regulation and Deregulation from Legal Theory to the Practical Case of the Financial Sector Nowadays
title_full Regulation and Deregulation from Legal Theory to the Practical Case of the Financial Sector Nowadays
title_fullStr Regulation and Deregulation from Legal Theory to the Practical Case of the Financial Sector Nowadays
title_full_unstemmed Regulation and Deregulation from Legal Theory to the Practical Case of the Financial Sector Nowadays
title_sort regulation and deregulation from legal theory to the practical case of the financial sector nowadays
publisher Danubius University
series EIRP Proceedings
issn 2067-9211
2069-9344
publishDate 2012-05-01
description The two great challenges for any authority are to what extent and how to intervene in thefunctioning of the society. These challenges originate both in the world of ideologies, defining the type ofstate or authority based on its propensity for regulation, and in the technical expertise of technocraticmanagement that can identify the “good practice” and “good governance” features. Both policy sources arenecessary and legitimate. The ideological sources help support a representative mandate obtained by anelected power, being validated by citizens’ vote, while the technical ones contribute to optimising theefficiency of the public option by managing it in an appropriate manner. To set a simple example, if theideological option is in favour of maintaining a company under state ownership, then the technical optionmay be to ensure a competency-based management controlled solely according to performance criteria. Ifthe ideological option promotes the privatisation of a state-owned company, then the technical option mayseek to ensure a privatisation procedure that should maximise the public benefit (through price, othercontractual terms, enhanced market competition, clauses or measures to protect consumers, etc.)
topic management
good practice
good governance
public benefit
url http://www.proceedings.univ-danubius.ro/index.php/eirp/article/view/1297/1181
work_keys_str_mv AT bogdanolteanu regulationandderegulationfromlegaltheorytothepracticalcaseofthefinancialsectornowadays
_version_ 1725704709566627840