Detection and diagnosis of breast lesions: Performance evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic r

Objective: To assess the impact of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and magnetic resonance mammography (MRM) in enhancing the performance of digital mammography (DM) in the detection and evaluation of different breast lesions. Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, 98 patients with 103...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rasha Kamal, Sahar Mansour, Dalia ElMesidy, Kareem Moussa, Ahmed Hussien
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2016-09-01
Series:The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378603X16300900
id doaj-20695511dfb845409a626fc1347ddb9b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-20695511dfb845409a626fc1347ddb9b2020-11-25T01:21:19ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine0378-603X2016-09-014731159117210.1016/j.ejrnm.2016.06.008Detection and diagnosis of breast lesions: Performance evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic rRasha Kamal0Sahar Mansour1Dalia ElMesidy2Kareem Moussa3Ahmed Hussien4Radiology Department (Women’s Imaging Unit), Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, EgyptRadiology Department (Women’s Imaging Unit), Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, EgyptRadiology Department (Women’s Imaging Unit), Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, EgyptRadiology Department (Women’s Imaging Unit), Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, EgyptSurgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, EgyptObjective: To assess the impact of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and magnetic resonance mammography (MRM) in enhancing the performance of digital mammography (DM) in the detection and evaluation of different breast lesions. Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, 98 patients with 103 breast lesions were assessed by DM, DBT and MRM. Mammography images were acquired using the “combo mode", where both DM and DBT scanned in the same compression. MRM was performed by 1T open system. Each lesion was assigned a blinded category in an individual performance for each modality. The resultant BI-RADS categories were correlated with reports of the pathology specimens or outcome of 18-month follow-up. Results: Both DBT and MRM showed equivalent sensitivity of 92%. The specificity for DBT and MRM was 80.7% and 89.7% respectively. The efficacy of DM was raised from 61% to 83.5% with DBT and 90.2% with MRM. The results of the three modalities and the final diagnosis revealed a significant correlation (p = 0.035).The association between the results of DBT and those of MRM showed statistically significant difference between DBT and MRM for diagnosing breast lesions (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Both MRM and DBT provide better performance than classic DM. Adding either of these modalities to the classic examination enhances diagnosis and precise disease distribution.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378603X16300900Breast cancerDigital mammographyDigital breast tomosynthesisMagnetic resonance mammography
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rasha Kamal
Sahar Mansour
Dalia ElMesidy
Kareem Moussa
Ahmed Hussien
spellingShingle Rasha Kamal
Sahar Mansour
Dalia ElMesidy
Kareem Moussa
Ahmed Hussien
Detection and diagnosis of breast lesions: Performance evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic r
The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
Breast cancer
Digital mammography
Digital breast tomosynthesis
Magnetic resonance mammography
author_facet Rasha Kamal
Sahar Mansour
Dalia ElMesidy
Kareem Moussa
Ahmed Hussien
author_sort Rasha Kamal
title Detection and diagnosis of breast lesions: Performance evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic r
title_short Detection and diagnosis of breast lesions: Performance evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic r
title_full Detection and diagnosis of breast lesions: Performance evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic r
title_fullStr Detection and diagnosis of breast lesions: Performance evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic r
title_full_unstemmed Detection and diagnosis of breast lesions: Performance evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic r
title_sort detection and diagnosis of breast lesions: performance evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic r
publisher SpringerOpen
series The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine
issn 0378-603X
publishDate 2016-09-01
description Objective: To assess the impact of digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and magnetic resonance mammography (MRM) in enhancing the performance of digital mammography (DM) in the detection and evaluation of different breast lesions. Patients and methods: In this retrospective study, 98 patients with 103 breast lesions were assessed by DM, DBT and MRM. Mammography images were acquired using the “combo mode", where both DM and DBT scanned in the same compression. MRM was performed by 1T open system. Each lesion was assigned a blinded category in an individual performance for each modality. The resultant BI-RADS categories were correlated with reports of the pathology specimens or outcome of 18-month follow-up. Results: Both DBT and MRM showed equivalent sensitivity of 92%. The specificity for DBT and MRM was 80.7% and 89.7% respectively. The efficacy of DM was raised from 61% to 83.5% with DBT and 90.2% with MRM. The results of the three modalities and the final diagnosis revealed a significant correlation (p = 0.035).The association between the results of DBT and those of MRM showed statistically significant difference between DBT and MRM for diagnosing breast lesions (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Both MRM and DBT provide better performance than classic DM. Adding either of these modalities to the classic examination enhances diagnosis and precise disease distribution.
topic Breast cancer
Digital mammography
Digital breast tomosynthesis
Magnetic resonance mammography
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378603X16300900
work_keys_str_mv AT rashakamal detectionanddiagnosisofbreastlesionsperformanceevaluationofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisandmagneticr
AT saharmansour detectionanddiagnosisofbreastlesionsperformanceevaluationofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisandmagneticr
AT daliaelmesidy detectionanddiagnosisofbreastlesionsperformanceevaluationofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisandmagneticr
AT kareemmoussa detectionanddiagnosisofbreastlesionsperformanceevaluationofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisandmagneticr
AT ahmedhussien detectionanddiagnosisofbreastlesionsperformanceevaluationofdigitalbreasttomosynthesisandmagneticr
_version_ 1725130944447250432