Reverse logistics in the Czech Republic: Barriers to development

The article presents empirical survey results concerning two objectives. The first objective was to describe barriers of reverse logistics (RL) development in Czech companies. The other one was to research whether there are different views of these barriers between company experts and top managers....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Radoslav Škapa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mendel University Press 2011-01-01
Series:Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://acta.mendelu.cz/59/4/0363/
id doaj-20820dab89b545e396084018f9debfca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-20820dab89b545e396084018f9debfca2020-11-25T00:11:58ZengMendel University PressActa Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis1211-85162464-83102011-01-0159436337010.11118/actaun201159040363Reverse logistics in the Czech Republic: Barriers to developmentRadoslav Škapa0Katedra podnikového hospodářství, Ekonomicko–správní fakulta, Masarykova univerzita, Lipová 41a, 602 00 Brno, Česká republikaThe article presents empirical survey results concerning two objectives. The first objective was to describe barriers of reverse logistics (RL) development in Czech companies. The other one was to research whether there are different views of these barriers between company experts and top managers. The analyses are based on data obtained through a questionnaire survey of 102 representatives of companies operating in the Czech Republic. The study applied basic statistical methods used in quantitative research.Based on answer frequencies of respondents, the main internal barrier of RL development is its little importance in comparison with other activities, followed by the lack of systematic management, and unskilled workforce. On the other hand, customers are regarded as the most significant external barrier due to their careless handling with products and packaging as well as their pressure on the sale price. The obtained data also speak volumes about the differences in the view of the RL importance (in the second part of the article). Employees whose work is directly connected with reverse flows report the insignificance of RL as a barrier less frequently than top managers, who quoted this opinion in 50% cases.https://acta.mendelu.cz/59/4/0363/reverse logisticsmanagement of reverse flowsperception of barrierssurvey results
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Radoslav Škapa
spellingShingle Radoslav Škapa
Reverse logistics in the Czech Republic: Barriers to development
Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
reverse logistics
management of reverse flows
perception of barriers
survey results
author_facet Radoslav Škapa
author_sort Radoslav Škapa
title Reverse logistics in the Czech Republic: Barriers to development
title_short Reverse logistics in the Czech Republic: Barriers to development
title_full Reverse logistics in the Czech Republic: Barriers to development
title_fullStr Reverse logistics in the Czech Republic: Barriers to development
title_full_unstemmed Reverse logistics in the Czech Republic: Barriers to development
title_sort reverse logistics in the czech republic: barriers to development
publisher Mendel University Press
series Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis
issn 1211-8516
2464-8310
publishDate 2011-01-01
description The article presents empirical survey results concerning two objectives. The first objective was to describe barriers of reverse logistics (RL) development in Czech companies. The other one was to research whether there are different views of these barriers between company experts and top managers. The analyses are based on data obtained through a questionnaire survey of 102 representatives of companies operating in the Czech Republic. The study applied basic statistical methods used in quantitative research.Based on answer frequencies of respondents, the main internal barrier of RL development is its little importance in comparison with other activities, followed by the lack of systematic management, and unskilled workforce. On the other hand, customers are regarded as the most significant external barrier due to their careless handling with products and packaging as well as their pressure on the sale price. The obtained data also speak volumes about the differences in the view of the RL importance (in the second part of the article). Employees whose work is directly connected with reverse flows report the insignificance of RL as a barrier less frequently than top managers, who quoted this opinion in 50% cases.
topic reverse logistics
management of reverse flows
perception of barriers
survey results
url https://acta.mendelu.cz/59/4/0363/
work_keys_str_mv AT radoslavskapa reverselogisticsintheczechrepublicbarrierstodevelopment
_version_ 1725402108951265280