Response to David Temperley's Commentary

The author responds to points raised in David Temperley’s commentary, which appeared in Vol. 1, No. 2 of Empirical Musicology Review. The response includes a discussion of strengths and limitations of atemporal models of musical perception, with particular attention to presentations such as those of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: William Thomson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Ohio State University Libraries 2006-09-01
Series:Empirical Musicology Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/handle/1811/24066
id doaj-208581b0217e4e0e8650d96a0813ad09
record_format Article
spelling doaj-208581b0217e4e0e8650d96a0813ad092020-11-25T00:41:19ZengThe Ohio State University LibrariesEmpirical Musicology Review1559-57492006-09-011318218410.18061/1811/24066Response to David Temperley's CommentaryWilliam ThomsonThe author responds to points raised in David Temperley’s commentary, which appeared in Vol. 1, No. 2 of Empirical Musicology Review. The response includes a discussion of strengths and limitations of atemporal models of musical perception, with particular attention to presentations such as those of Carol Krumhansl and Fred Lerdahl.https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/handle/1811/24066perceptionmelodymelodicharmonytonalityformstructure
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author William Thomson
spellingShingle William Thomson
Response to David Temperley's Commentary
Empirical Musicology Review
perception
melody
melodic
harmony
tonality
form
structure
author_facet William Thomson
author_sort William Thomson
title Response to David Temperley's Commentary
title_short Response to David Temperley's Commentary
title_full Response to David Temperley's Commentary
title_fullStr Response to David Temperley's Commentary
title_full_unstemmed Response to David Temperley's Commentary
title_sort response to david temperley's commentary
publisher The Ohio State University Libraries
series Empirical Musicology Review
issn 1559-5749
publishDate 2006-09-01
description The author responds to points raised in David Temperley’s commentary, which appeared in Vol. 1, No. 2 of Empirical Musicology Review. The response includes a discussion of strengths and limitations of atemporal models of musical perception, with particular attention to presentations such as those of Carol Krumhansl and Fred Lerdahl.
topic perception
melody
melodic
harmony
tonality
form
structure
url https://kb.osu.edu/dspace/handle/1811/24066
work_keys_str_mv AT williamthomson responsetodavidtemperleyscommentary
_version_ 1725286033663197184