Influence of desensitizers agents on the dentin bond strength after one-year water storage

Aim: Evaluate the effect of adhesives systems combined with desensitizer agents on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a composite resin to dentin. Methods: Cervical dentin of thirty-two human molars were used to simulate hypersensitivity areas. The teeth were divided into four groups (n=8), a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gabriel Nima, Renata Bacelar Sá, Marcelo Giannini
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2020-03-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8658334
id doaj-208c06dda84247eab835ef468d5a456a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-208c06dda84247eab835ef468d5a456a2021-07-15T13:58:35ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252020-03-011910.20396/bjos.v19i0.8658334Influence of desensitizers agents on the dentin bond strength after one-year water storageGabriel Nima0Renata Bacelar Sá1Marcelo Giannini2State University of CampinasState University of CampinasState University of Campinas Aim: Evaluate the effect of adhesives systems combined with desensitizer agents on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a composite resin to dentin. Methods: Cervical dentin of thirty-two human molars were used to simulate hypersensitivity areas. The teeth were divided into four groups (n=8), according to the type of adhesive system and desensitizer agents. No desensitizer was used in the control (Clearfil SE Bond – CS). Two experimental groups were pretreated with either MS Coat Bond (MS) or Biofluorid 12 (BF) immediately prior to bonding with CS. The last group corresponded to Gluma Comfort Bond + Desensitizer (GC) application. After dentin treatments, a composite block was built-up on dentin surface and after 24 hours teeth were serially sectioned to obtain bonded bean specimens. Beams were stored in water for 24 hours or one year. Subsequently, the specimens were submitted to the μTBS test. Data were analyzed by two-way mixed ANOVA and Bonferroni’s test (α = 0.05). Results: At 24 hours, there was no significant difference in μTBS among groups. However, at one year, dentin treated with MS or BF demonstrated significantly lower μTBS of CS to dentin compared to control and GC, which kept their μTBS stable. Conclusion: The effect of MS and BF desensitizer agents on the μTBS of CS to dentin did not reduce the μTBS at 24 hours, but it decreases significantly after one year. https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8658334Dentin desensitizingDentin sensitivityCalcium fluorideOxalic acid
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gabriel Nima
Renata Bacelar Sá
Marcelo Giannini
spellingShingle Gabriel Nima
Renata Bacelar Sá
Marcelo Giannini
Influence of desensitizers agents on the dentin bond strength after one-year water storage
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Dentin desensitizing
Dentin sensitivity
Calcium fluoride
Oxalic acid
author_facet Gabriel Nima
Renata Bacelar Sá
Marcelo Giannini
author_sort Gabriel Nima
title Influence of desensitizers agents on the dentin bond strength after one-year water storage
title_short Influence of desensitizers agents on the dentin bond strength after one-year water storage
title_full Influence of desensitizers agents on the dentin bond strength after one-year water storage
title_fullStr Influence of desensitizers agents on the dentin bond strength after one-year water storage
title_full_unstemmed Influence of desensitizers agents on the dentin bond strength after one-year water storage
title_sort influence of desensitizers agents on the dentin bond strength after one-year water storage
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
series Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
issn 1677-3225
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Aim: Evaluate the effect of adhesives systems combined with desensitizer agents on the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of a composite resin to dentin. Methods: Cervical dentin of thirty-two human molars were used to simulate hypersensitivity areas. The teeth were divided into four groups (n=8), according to the type of adhesive system and desensitizer agents. No desensitizer was used in the control (Clearfil SE Bond – CS). Two experimental groups were pretreated with either MS Coat Bond (MS) or Biofluorid 12 (BF) immediately prior to bonding with CS. The last group corresponded to Gluma Comfort Bond + Desensitizer (GC) application. After dentin treatments, a composite block was built-up on dentin surface and after 24 hours teeth were serially sectioned to obtain bonded bean specimens. Beams were stored in water for 24 hours or one year. Subsequently, the specimens were submitted to the μTBS test. Data were analyzed by two-way mixed ANOVA and Bonferroni’s test (α = 0.05). Results: At 24 hours, there was no significant difference in μTBS among groups. However, at one year, dentin treated with MS or BF demonstrated significantly lower μTBS of CS to dentin compared to control and GC, which kept their μTBS stable. Conclusion: The effect of MS and BF desensitizer agents on the μTBS of CS to dentin did not reduce the μTBS at 24 hours, but it decreases significantly after one year.
topic Dentin desensitizing
Dentin sensitivity
Calcium fluoride
Oxalic acid
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8658334
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielnima influenceofdesensitizersagentsonthedentinbondstrengthafteroneyearwaterstorage
AT renatabacelarsa influenceofdesensitizersagentsonthedentinbondstrengthafteroneyearwaterstorage
AT marcelogiannini influenceofdesensitizersagentsonthedentinbondstrengthafteroneyearwaterstorage
_version_ 1721300536778555392