An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students

Background: Competence in quality improvement (QI) is a priority for medical students. We describe a self-directed QI skills curriculum for medical students in a 1-year longitudinal integrated third-year clerkship: an ideal context to learn and practice QI. Methods: Two groups of four students ident...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Stern Levitt, Karen E. Hauer, Ann Poncelet, Somnath Mookherjee
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2012-05-01
Series:Medical Education Online
Subjects:
Online Access:http://med-ed-online.net/index.php/meo/article/view/18391/pdf_1
id doaj-20ec5f458f934449a99706616b01724b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-20ec5f458f934449a99706616b01724b2020-11-25T02:01:12ZengTaylor & Francis GroupMedical Education Online1087-29812012-05-011701810.3402/meo.v17i0.18391An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical studentsDavid Stern LevittKaren E. HauerAnn PonceletSomnath MookherjeeBackground: Competence in quality improvement (QI) is a priority for medical students. We describe a self-directed QI skills curriculum for medical students in a 1-year longitudinal integrated third-year clerkship: an ideal context to learn and practice QI. Methods: Two groups of four students identified a quality gap, described existing efforts to address the gap, made quantifying measures, and proposed a QI intervention. The program was assessed with knowledge and attitude surveys and a validated tool for rating trainee QI proposals. Reaction to the curriculum was assessed by survey and focus group. Results: Knowledge of QI concepts did not improve (mean knowledge score±SD): pre: 5.9±1.5 vs. post: 6.6±1.3, p=0.20. There were significant improvements in attitudes (mean topic attitude score±SD) toward the value of QI (pre: 9.9±1.8 vs. post: 12.6±1.9, p=0.03) and confidence in QI skills (pre: 13.4±2.8 vs. post: 16.1±3.0, p=0.05). Proposals lacked sufficient analysis of interventions and evaluation plans. Reaction was mixed, including appreciation for the experience and frustration with finding appropriate mentorship. Conclusion: Clinical-year students were able to conduct a self-directed QI project. Lack of improvement in QI knowledge suggests that self-directed learning in this domain may be insufficient without targeted didactics. Higher order skills such as developing measurement plans would benefit from explicit instruction and mentorship. Lessons from this experience will allow educators to better target QI curricula to medical students in the clinical years.http://med-ed-online.net/index.php/meo/article/view/18391/pdf_1quality improvement educationundergraduate medical educationexperiential learningself-directed learning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David Stern Levitt
Karen E. Hauer
Ann Poncelet
Somnath Mookherjee
spellingShingle David Stern Levitt
Karen E. Hauer
Ann Poncelet
Somnath Mookherjee
An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
Medical Education Online
quality improvement education
undergraduate medical education
experiential learning
self-directed learning
author_facet David Stern Levitt
Karen E. Hauer
Ann Poncelet
Somnath Mookherjee
author_sort David Stern Levitt
title An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
title_short An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
title_full An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
title_fullStr An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
title_full_unstemmed An innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
title_sort innovative quality improvement curriculum for third-year medical students
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Medical Education Online
issn 1087-2981
publishDate 2012-05-01
description Background: Competence in quality improvement (QI) is a priority for medical students. We describe a self-directed QI skills curriculum for medical students in a 1-year longitudinal integrated third-year clerkship: an ideal context to learn and practice QI. Methods: Two groups of four students identified a quality gap, described existing efforts to address the gap, made quantifying measures, and proposed a QI intervention. The program was assessed with knowledge and attitude surveys and a validated tool for rating trainee QI proposals. Reaction to the curriculum was assessed by survey and focus group. Results: Knowledge of QI concepts did not improve (mean knowledge score±SD): pre: 5.9±1.5 vs. post: 6.6±1.3, p=0.20. There were significant improvements in attitudes (mean topic attitude score±SD) toward the value of QI (pre: 9.9±1.8 vs. post: 12.6±1.9, p=0.03) and confidence in QI skills (pre: 13.4±2.8 vs. post: 16.1±3.0, p=0.05). Proposals lacked sufficient analysis of interventions and evaluation plans. Reaction was mixed, including appreciation for the experience and frustration with finding appropriate mentorship. Conclusion: Clinical-year students were able to conduct a self-directed QI project. Lack of improvement in QI knowledge suggests that self-directed learning in this domain may be insufficient without targeted didactics. Higher order skills such as developing measurement plans would benefit from explicit instruction and mentorship. Lessons from this experience will allow educators to better target QI curricula to medical students in the clinical years.
topic quality improvement education
undergraduate medical education
experiential learning
self-directed learning
url http://med-ed-online.net/index.php/meo/article/view/18391/pdf_1
work_keys_str_mv AT davidsternlevitt aninnovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT karenehauer aninnovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT annponcelet aninnovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT somnathmookherjee aninnovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT davidsternlevitt innovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT karenehauer innovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT annponcelet innovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents
AT somnathmookherjee innovativequalityimprovementcurriculumforthirdyearmedicalstudents
_version_ 1724958099747373056