Strategies for a Successful Anatomic Pathology Subspecialty Workgroup

From 1990 to present, 14 liver pathologists and 2 clinical hepatologists from 9 countries have met annually to hold thematic 2.5-day meetings centered on case-based discussion. The goal of these meetings has been to identify gaps in knowledge in our field and fuel scholarly effort to address these g...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-06-01
Series:Academic Pathology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289516653766
id doaj-211c9c26c50c4de6951f7709d5e47d12
record_format Article
spelling doaj-211c9c26c50c4de6951f7709d5e47d122020-11-25T03:21:21ZengSAGE PublishingAcademic Pathology2374-28952016-06-01310.1177/237428951665376610.1177_2374289516653766Strategies for a Successful Anatomic Pathology Subspecialty Workgroup 0The members of this group are listed in the author’s note at the end of this articleFrom 1990 to present, 14 liver pathologists and 2 clinical hepatologists from 9 countries have met annually to hold thematic 2.5-day meetings centered on case-based discussion. The goal of these meetings has been to identify gaps in knowledge in our field and fuel scholarly effort to address these gaps. The founding principles were worldwide representation, good representation of women, compatibility of participants, commitment to stable membership and regular attendance, mutual education and friendship, and free exchange of ideas. A summary report of the 2.5-day meeting constituted an enduring document that captured the free flow of ideas discussed. These ideas were open to all participants for the pursuit of scholarship back at their home institutions. However, any idea borne out of an Elves meeting merits open invitation for other Elves to participate in, using established standards for meaningful coauthorship. Over 26 consecutive meetings (1990-2015), themes covered the breadth of liver pathology. With retirement of 2 individuals, resignation of 3, and death of 1, six new members were nominated and voted into membership. Over these same 26 years, active members published 2025 articles indexed in PubMEd Central under the topic “liver;” 3% of these articles represented collaborations between members. This international group represents a successful model in a subspecialty of anatomic pathology for open exchange of ideas, mutual education, and generation of topics worthy of scholarly investigation. We conclude that a self-selected group of subspecialty pathologists can meet successfully over 26 years, maintain a high state of engagement through each annual meeting, self-renew as a result of retirement or resignation, and provide a creative stimulus for highly productive academic careers.https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289516653766
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
title Strategies for a Successful Anatomic Pathology Subspecialty Workgroup
spellingShingle Strategies for a Successful Anatomic Pathology Subspecialty Workgroup
Academic Pathology
title_short Strategies for a Successful Anatomic Pathology Subspecialty Workgroup
title_full Strategies for a Successful Anatomic Pathology Subspecialty Workgroup
title_fullStr Strategies for a Successful Anatomic Pathology Subspecialty Workgroup
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for a Successful Anatomic Pathology Subspecialty Workgroup
title_sort strategies for a successful anatomic pathology subspecialty workgroup
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Academic Pathology
issn 2374-2895
publishDate 2016-06-01
description From 1990 to present, 14 liver pathologists and 2 clinical hepatologists from 9 countries have met annually to hold thematic 2.5-day meetings centered on case-based discussion. The goal of these meetings has been to identify gaps in knowledge in our field and fuel scholarly effort to address these gaps. The founding principles were worldwide representation, good representation of women, compatibility of participants, commitment to stable membership and regular attendance, mutual education and friendship, and free exchange of ideas. A summary report of the 2.5-day meeting constituted an enduring document that captured the free flow of ideas discussed. These ideas were open to all participants for the pursuit of scholarship back at their home institutions. However, any idea borne out of an Elves meeting merits open invitation for other Elves to participate in, using established standards for meaningful coauthorship. Over 26 consecutive meetings (1990-2015), themes covered the breadth of liver pathology. With retirement of 2 individuals, resignation of 3, and death of 1, six new members were nominated and voted into membership. Over these same 26 years, active members published 2025 articles indexed in PubMEd Central under the topic “liver;” 3% of these articles represented collaborations between members. This international group represents a successful model in a subspecialty of anatomic pathology for open exchange of ideas, mutual education, and generation of topics worthy of scholarly investigation. We conclude that a self-selected group of subspecialty pathologists can meet successfully over 26 years, maintain a high state of engagement through each annual meeting, self-renew as a result of retirement or resignation, and provide a creative stimulus for highly productive academic careers.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2374289516653766
work_keys_str_mv AT strategiesforasuccessfulanatomicpathologysubspecialtyworkgroup
_version_ 1724615223091920896