Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer

Purpose The aim of the study was to analyse and compare the ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp–MRI) and prostate biopsy (PB) to correctly identify tumor foci in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and Methods 157 patients with cl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesco Porpiglia, Filippo Russo, Matteo Manfredi, Fabrizio Mele, Cristian Fiori, Daniele Regge
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015-02-01
Series:International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000100124&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-21289e7457bc42f29fd710822b0ce7e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-21289e7457bc42f29fd710822b0ce7e72020-11-24T22:43:19ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-61192015-02-0141112413310.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.17S1677-55382015000100124Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancerFrancesco PorpigliaFilippo RussoMatteo ManfrediFabrizio MeleCristian FioriDaniele ReggePurpose The aim of the study was to analyse and compare the ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp–MRI) and prostate biopsy (PB) to correctly identify tumor foci in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and Methods 157 patients with clinically localised PCa with a PSA <10 ng/mL and a negative DRE diagnosed on the first (12 samples, Group A) or second (18 samples, Group B) PB were enrolled at our institution. All patients underwent mp-MRI with T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI prior to RP. A map of comparison describing each positive biopsy sample was created for each patient, with each tumor focus shown on the MRI and each lesion present on the definitive histological examination in order to compare tumor detection and location. The sensitivity of mp-MRI and PB for diagnosis was compared using Student’s t-test. The ability of the two exams to detect the prevalence of Gleason pattern 4 in the identified lesions was compared using a chi-square test. Results Overall sensitivity of PB and mp-MRI to identify tumor lesion was 59.4% and 78.9%, respectively (p<0.0001). PB missed 144/355 lesions, 59 of which (16.6%) were significant. mp-MRI missed 75/355 lesions, 12 of which (3.4%) were significant. No lesions with a GS≥8 were missed. Sensitivity of PB and mp-MRI to detect the prevalence of Gleason pattern 4 was 88.2% and 97.4%, respectively. Conclusions mp-MRI seems to identify more tumor lesions than PB and to provide more information concerning tumor characteristics.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000100124&lng=en&tlng=enProstatic NeoplasmsProstateMagnetic Resonance ImagingProstatectomyBiopsy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Francesco Porpiglia
Filippo Russo
Matteo Manfredi
Fabrizio Mele
Cristian Fiori
Daniele Regge
spellingShingle Francesco Porpiglia
Filippo Russo
Matteo Manfredi
Fabrizio Mele
Cristian Fiori
Daniele Regge
Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer
International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Prostatic Neoplasms
Prostate
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Prostatectomy
Biopsy
author_facet Francesco Porpiglia
Filippo Russo
Matteo Manfredi
Fabrizio Mele
Cristian Fiori
Daniele Regge
author_sort Francesco Porpiglia
title Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer
title_short Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer
title_full Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer
title_fullStr Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer
title_sort preoperative prostate biopsy and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: reliability in detecting prostate cancer
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
series International Brazilian Journal of Urology
issn 1677-6119
publishDate 2015-02-01
description Purpose The aim of the study was to analyse and compare the ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp–MRI) and prostate biopsy (PB) to correctly identify tumor foci in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer (PCa). Materials and Methods 157 patients with clinically localised PCa with a PSA <10 ng/mL and a negative DRE diagnosed on the first (12 samples, Group A) or second (18 samples, Group B) PB were enrolled at our institution. All patients underwent mp-MRI with T2-weighted images, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI prior to RP. A map of comparison describing each positive biopsy sample was created for each patient, with each tumor focus shown on the MRI and each lesion present on the definitive histological examination in order to compare tumor detection and location. The sensitivity of mp-MRI and PB for diagnosis was compared using Student’s t-test. The ability of the two exams to detect the prevalence of Gleason pattern 4 in the identified lesions was compared using a chi-square test. Results Overall sensitivity of PB and mp-MRI to identify tumor lesion was 59.4% and 78.9%, respectively (p<0.0001). PB missed 144/355 lesions, 59 of which (16.6%) were significant. mp-MRI missed 75/355 lesions, 12 of which (3.4%) were significant. No lesions with a GS≥8 were missed. Sensitivity of PB and mp-MRI to detect the prevalence of Gleason pattern 4 was 88.2% and 97.4%, respectively. Conclusions mp-MRI seems to identify more tumor lesions than PB and to provide more information concerning tumor characteristics.
topic Prostatic Neoplasms
Prostate
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Prostatectomy
Biopsy
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000100124&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT francescoporpiglia preoperativeprostatebiopsyandmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingreliabilityindetectingprostatecancer
AT filipporusso preoperativeprostatebiopsyandmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingreliabilityindetectingprostatecancer
AT matteomanfredi preoperativeprostatebiopsyandmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingreliabilityindetectingprostatecancer
AT fabriziomele preoperativeprostatebiopsyandmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingreliabilityindetectingprostatecancer
AT cristianfiori preoperativeprostatebiopsyandmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingreliabilityindetectingprostatecancer
AT danieleregge preoperativeprostatebiopsyandmultiparametricmagneticresonanceimagingreliabilityindetectingprostatecancer
_version_ 1725696522502275072