Uncertainty Analysis of Spatiotemporal Models with Point Estimate Methods (PEMs)—The Case of the ANUGA Hydrodynamic Model

Practitioners often neglect the uncertainty inherent to models and their inputs. Point Estimate Methods (PEMs) offer an alternative to the common, but computationally demanding, method for assessing model uncertainty, Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. PEMs rerun the model with representative values of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maikel Issermann, Fi-John Chang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-01-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/1/229
id doaj-21b35ac64394435992931a187f0e86f0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-21b35ac64394435992931a187f0e86f02020-11-25T03:30:24ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412020-01-0112122910.3390/w12010229w12010229Uncertainty Analysis of Spatiotemporal Models with Point Estimate Methods (PEMs)—The Case of the ANUGA Hydrodynamic ModelMaikel Issermann0Fi-John Chang1Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, TaiwanDepartment of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, TaiwanPractitioners often neglect the uncertainty inherent to models and their inputs. Point Estimate Methods (PEMs) offer an alternative to the common, but computationally demanding, method for assessing model uncertainty, Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. PEMs rerun the model with representative values of the probability distribution of the uncertain variable. The results can estimate the statistical moments of the output distribution. Hong’s method is the specific PEM implemented here for a case study that simulates water runoff using the ANUGA model for an area in Glasgow, UK. Elevation is the source of uncertainty. Three realizations of the Sequential Gaussian Simulation, which produces the random error fields that can be used as inputs for any spatial model, are scaled according to representative values of the distribution and their weights. The output from a MC simulation is used for validation. A comparison of the first two statistical moments indicates that Hong’s method tends to underestimate the first moment and overestimate the second moment. Model efficiency performance measures validate the usefulness of Hong’s method for the approximation of the first two moments, despite the method suffering from outliers. Estimation was less accurate for higher moments but the moment estimates were sufficient to use the Grams-Charlier Expansion to fit a distribution to them. Regarding probabilistic flood-inundation maps, Hong’s method shows very similar probabilities in the same areas as the MC simulation. However, the former requires just three 11-minute simulation runs, rather than the 500 required for the MC simulation. Hong’s method therefore appears attractive for approximating the uncertainty of spatiotemporal models.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/1/229flood-risk maphydrodynamic modellingsequential gaussian simulationurban stormwater
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maikel Issermann
Fi-John Chang
spellingShingle Maikel Issermann
Fi-John Chang
Uncertainty Analysis of Spatiotemporal Models with Point Estimate Methods (PEMs)—The Case of the ANUGA Hydrodynamic Model
Water
flood-risk map
hydrodynamic modelling
sequential gaussian simulation
urban stormwater
author_facet Maikel Issermann
Fi-John Chang
author_sort Maikel Issermann
title Uncertainty Analysis of Spatiotemporal Models with Point Estimate Methods (PEMs)—The Case of the ANUGA Hydrodynamic Model
title_short Uncertainty Analysis of Spatiotemporal Models with Point Estimate Methods (PEMs)—The Case of the ANUGA Hydrodynamic Model
title_full Uncertainty Analysis of Spatiotemporal Models with Point Estimate Methods (PEMs)—The Case of the ANUGA Hydrodynamic Model
title_fullStr Uncertainty Analysis of Spatiotemporal Models with Point Estimate Methods (PEMs)—The Case of the ANUGA Hydrodynamic Model
title_full_unstemmed Uncertainty Analysis of Spatiotemporal Models with Point Estimate Methods (PEMs)—The Case of the ANUGA Hydrodynamic Model
title_sort uncertainty analysis of spatiotemporal models with point estimate methods (pems)—the case of the anuga hydrodynamic model
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Practitioners often neglect the uncertainty inherent to models and their inputs. Point Estimate Methods (PEMs) offer an alternative to the common, but computationally demanding, method for assessing model uncertainty, Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. PEMs rerun the model with representative values of the probability distribution of the uncertain variable. The results can estimate the statistical moments of the output distribution. Hong’s method is the specific PEM implemented here for a case study that simulates water runoff using the ANUGA model for an area in Glasgow, UK. Elevation is the source of uncertainty. Three realizations of the Sequential Gaussian Simulation, which produces the random error fields that can be used as inputs for any spatial model, are scaled according to representative values of the distribution and their weights. The output from a MC simulation is used for validation. A comparison of the first two statistical moments indicates that Hong’s method tends to underestimate the first moment and overestimate the second moment. Model efficiency performance measures validate the usefulness of Hong’s method for the approximation of the first two moments, despite the method suffering from outliers. Estimation was less accurate for higher moments but the moment estimates were sufficient to use the Grams-Charlier Expansion to fit a distribution to them. Regarding probabilistic flood-inundation maps, Hong’s method shows very similar probabilities in the same areas as the MC simulation. However, the former requires just three 11-minute simulation runs, rather than the 500 required for the MC simulation. Hong’s method therefore appears attractive for approximating the uncertainty of spatiotemporal models.
topic flood-risk map
hydrodynamic modelling
sequential gaussian simulation
urban stormwater
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/1/229
work_keys_str_mv AT maikelissermann uncertaintyanalysisofspatiotemporalmodelswithpointestimatemethodspemsthecaseoftheanugahydrodynamicmodel
AT fijohnchang uncertaintyanalysisofspatiotemporalmodelswithpointestimatemethodspemsthecaseoftheanugahydrodynamicmodel
_version_ 1724575847562608640