Intermittent Oral Versus Intravenous Alfacalcidol in Dialysis Patients

Patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF) on maintenance dialysis, commonly develop secondary hyperparathyroidism and renal osteodystrophy (ROD). Alfacalcidol, taken orally or administered intravenously, is known to reverse these complications. In this study, 19 ESRF patients, who were on dialysi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mitwalli Ahmed, Alam Awatif
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2000-01-01
Series:Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sjkdt.org/article.asp?issn=1319-2442;year=2000;volume=11;issue=2;spage=174;epage=180;aulast=Mitwalli
id doaj-21c8c4cf01254defa33f9a4cb26bf5e2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-21c8c4cf01254defa33f9a4cb26bf5e22020-11-24T22:59:34ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSaudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation1319-24422000-01-01112174180Intermittent Oral Versus Intravenous Alfacalcidol in Dialysis PatientsMitwalli AhmedAlam AwatifPatients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF) on maintenance dialysis, commonly develop secondary hyperparathyroidism and renal osteodystrophy (ROD). Alfacalcidol, taken orally or administered intravenously, is known to reverse these complications. In this study, 19 ESRF patients, who were on dialysis (13 on hemodialysis and six on peritoneal dialysis) for longer than six months and having serum parathormone levels at least four times normal and serum calcium less than 2.1 mmol/L, were randomly allocated to treatment with oral or intravenous (i.v.) alfacalcidol for a period of 12 months. There were six patients on hemodialysis (HD) and three on peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the oral treatment group while in the i.v. group there were seven patients on HD and three on PD. Clinical and serial biochemical assessments showed no statistically significant difference between the orally- and i.v.-treated patients in terms of suppressing secondary hyperparathyroidism and osteodystrophy. However, patients with features of mild ROD on bone histology, had more satisfactory changes in biochemistry when compared to others. Our results further support the use of intermittent oral alfacalcidol in ESRF patients because of its cost effectiveness, ease of administration and convenience, especially for peritoneal dialysis patients.http://www.sjkdt.org/article.asp?issn=1319-2442;year=2000;volume=11;issue=2;spage=174;epage=180;aulast=MitwalliEnd-stage renal failureOsteodystrophyHyperparathyroidismAlfacalcidolDialysis.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mitwalli Ahmed
Alam Awatif
spellingShingle Mitwalli Ahmed
Alam Awatif
Intermittent Oral Versus Intravenous Alfacalcidol in Dialysis Patients
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
End-stage renal failure
Osteodystrophy
Hyperparathyroidism
Alfacalcidol
Dialysis.
author_facet Mitwalli Ahmed
Alam Awatif
author_sort Mitwalli Ahmed
title Intermittent Oral Versus Intravenous Alfacalcidol in Dialysis Patients
title_short Intermittent Oral Versus Intravenous Alfacalcidol in Dialysis Patients
title_full Intermittent Oral Versus Intravenous Alfacalcidol in Dialysis Patients
title_fullStr Intermittent Oral Versus Intravenous Alfacalcidol in Dialysis Patients
title_full_unstemmed Intermittent Oral Versus Intravenous Alfacalcidol in Dialysis Patients
title_sort intermittent oral versus intravenous alfacalcidol in dialysis patients
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
issn 1319-2442
publishDate 2000-01-01
description Patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF) on maintenance dialysis, commonly develop secondary hyperparathyroidism and renal osteodystrophy (ROD). Alfacalcidol, taken orally or administered intravenously, is known to reverse these complications. In this study, 19 ESRF patients, who were on dialysis (13 on hemodialysis and six on peritoneal dialysis) for longer than six months and having serum parathormone levels at least four times normal and serum calcium less than 2.1 mmol/L, were randomly allocated to treatment with oral or intravenous (i.v.) alfacalcidol for a period of 12 months. There were six patients on hemodialysis (HD) and three on peritoneal dialysis (PD) in the oral treatment group while in the i.v. group there were seven patients on HD and three on PD. Clinical and serial biochemical assessments showed no statistically significant difference between the orally- and i.v.-treated patients in terms of suppressing secondary hyperparathyroidism and osteodystrophy. However, patients with features of mild ROD on bone histology, had more satisfactory changes in biochemistry when compared to others. Our results further support the use of intermittent oral alfacalcidol in ESRF patients because of its cost effectiveness, ease of administration and convenience, especially for peritoneal dialysis patients.
topic End-stage renal failure
Osteodystrophy
Hyperparathyroidism
Alfacalcidol
Dialysis.
url http://www.sjkdt.org/article.asp?issn=1319-2442;year=2000;volume=11;issue=2;spage=174;epage=180;aulast=Mitwalli
work_keys_str_mv AT mitwalliahmed intermittentoralversusintravenousalfacalcidolindialysispatients
AT alamawatif intermittentoralversusintravenousalfacalcidolindialysispatients
_version_ 1725644779138580480