Modelling Inflation Uncertainty with Structural Breaks Case of Turkey (1994–2013)

In recent years, the importance attached to the concept of volatility has increased and become a phenomenon frequently encountered in every field ranging from financial markets to macroeconomic indicators. In this study, inflation data obtained from CPI index for the period of 1994:01–2013:12 in Tur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pınar Göktaş, Cem Dişbudak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:Mathematical Problems in Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/284161
id doaj-2212da71fcf445aba901729312b91127
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2212da71fcf445aba901729312b911272020-11-24T22:28:50ZengHindawi LimitedMathematical Problems in Engineering1024-123X1563-51472014-01-01201410.1155/2014/284161284161Modelling Inflation Uncertainty with Structural Breaks Case of Turkey (1994–2013)Pınar Göktaş0Cem Dişbudak1Department of Economy, Faculty of Economy and Administration, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 48000 Muğla, TurkeyDepartment of Economy, Faculty of Economy and Administration, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, 48000 Muğla, TurkeyIn recent years, the importance attached to the concept of volatility has increased and become a phenomenon frequently encountered in every field ranging from financial markets to macroeconomic indicators. In this study, inflation data obtained from CPI index for the period of 1994:01–2013:12 in Turkey was used to determine the best representative of the inflation uncertainty. To realize this, both symmetric and asymmetric GARCH-type models were employed. Since there are many factors that may lead to structural change within the economic course of Turkey, a structural break in the series has first been investigated. By administering Bai-Perron structural break test, two different break points both in mean and variance have been detected to be in February 2002 and in June 2001, respectively. The inclusion of those break points to the related equations, appropriate forecasting models were projected. Moreover it was found that, while in the periods prior to the break in both variance and mean the inflation itself was the reason for inflation uncertainty, following the dates of the break, the relationship changed bidirectionally. In the meantime, when the series was taken as a whole without considering the break, bidirectional causality relationship was also detected in the series.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/284161
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pınar Göktaş
Cem Dişbudak
spellingShingle Pınar Göktaş
Cem Dişbudak
Modelling Inflation Uncertainty with Structural Breaks Case of Turkey (1994–2013)
Mathematical Problems in Engineering
author_facet Pınar Göktaş
Cem Dişbudak
author_sort Pınar Göktaş
title Modelling Inflation Uncertainty with Structural Breaks Case of Turkey (1994–2013)
title_short Modelling Inflation Uncertainty with Structural Breaks Case of Turkey (1994–2013)
title_full Modelling Inflation Uncertainty with Structural Breaks Case of Turkey (1994–2013)
title_fullStr Modelling Inflation Uncertainty with Structural Breaks Case of Turkey (1994–2013)
title_full_unstemmed Modelling Inflation Uncertainty with Structural Breaks Case of Turkey (1994–2013)
title_sort modelling inflation uncertainty with structural breaks case of turkey (1994–2013)
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Mathematical Problems in Engineering
issn 1024-123X
1563-5147
publishDate 2014-01-01
description In recent years, the importance attached to the concept of volatility has increased and become a phenomenon frequently encountered in every field ranging from financial markets to macroeconomic indicators. In this study, inflation data obtained from CPI index for the period of 1994:01–2013:12 in Turkey was used to determine the best representative of the inflation uncertainty. To realize this, both symmetric and asymmetric GARCH-type models were employed. Since there are many factors that may lead to structural change within the economic course of Turkey, a structural break in the series has first been investigated. By administering Bai-Perron structural break test, two different break points both in mean and variance have been detected to be in February 2002 and in June 2001, respectively. The inclusion of those break points to the related equations, appropriate forecasting models were projected. Moreover it was found that, while in the periods prior to the break in both variance and mean the inflation itself was the reason for inflation uncertainty, following the dates of the break, the relationship changed bidirectionally. In the meantime, when the series was taken as a whole without considering the break, bidirectional causality relationship was also detected in the series.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/284161
work_keys_str_mv AT pınargoktas modellinginflationuncertaintywithstructuralbreakscaseofturkey19942013
AT cemdisbudak modellinginflationuncertaintywithstructuralbreakscaseofturkey19942013
_version_ 1725746125019807744