Which one is the first choice for rapid ventricular rate atrial fibrillation in emergency department: Metoprolol or Diltiazem? A randomized clinical trial
Aim: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia managed by emergency physicians. Primary goals of treatment are hemodynamic stabilization, ventricular rate control, and prevention of embolic complications. The aim of this study is to compare the drug responses of the patients who...
Main Authors: | Rohat Ak, Mehmet Barış Memiş, Özgür Ordu, Özge Onur, Tuba Cimilli Öztürk |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Journal of Surgery and Medicine
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Surgery and Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/josam/issue/42845/443209 |
Similar Items
-
Intravenous Diltiazem or Metoprolol Administration in the Emergency Department for Acute Rate Control of Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Rapid Ventricular Response with Unknown Ejection Fraction
by: Mehmet Cihat Demir, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Successful treatment of polymedicamentous poisoning with metoprolol, diltiazem and cilazapril
by: Radovanović Milan R., et al.
Published: (2009-01-01) -
The importance of age: independent risk factor for atrial fibrillation in isolated rheumatic mitral stenosis
by: Ersin Saricam, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Clinical evaluation of paroxysmal and permanent atrial fibrillation patients in cardiac inpatient unit: Cross-sectional study
by: Mahmut Özdemir, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Safety and Efficacy of Prehospital Diltiazem
by: Jeffrey H Luk, et al.
Published: (2013-05-01)