A comparison of different methods to estimate species proportions by area in mixed stands

<p><em>Aim of the study:</em> This paper presents the most appropriate ways to estimate the species proportions by area in mixed stands of Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies</em> L. Karst.) and European beech (<em>Fagus sylvatica</em> L.) by comparing stand leve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gerald F. Dirnberger, Hubert Sterba
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria 2014-12-01
Series:Forest Systems
Online Access:http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/fs/article/view/6027
id doaj-225366ac9488406db9f2df779478ebf9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-225366ac9488406db9f2df779478ebf92020-11-25T00:13:18ZengInstituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y AlimentariaForest Systems2171-98452014-12-0123353454610.5424/fs/2014233-060272093A comparison of different methods to estimate species proportions by area in mixed standsGerald F. Dirnberger0Hubert Sterba1University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna Department of Forest and Soil Sciences Institute of Forest Growth.Dept. of Forest and Soil Sciences, BOKU University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna.<p><em>Aim of the study:</em> This paper presents the most appropriate ways to estimate the species proportions by area in mixed stands of Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies</em> L. Karst.) and European beech (<em>Fagus sylvatica</em> L.) by comparing stand level and individual tree level approaches. It also investigates whether different ways of describing species proportions by area can result in different judgments on the over- or under-yielding of species in mixtures.</p><p><em>Area of the study:</em> Three triplets of pure and mixed stands of Norway spruce and European beech in three locations in the northeast of Austria are investigated. The three locations differ considerably in slope, bedrock and soil type as well as in site index.</p><p><em>Material and Methods:</em> In all 9 plots the coordinates of all trees, their dbh, height, height to the crown base and five year increment were measured. The potentially available areas of individual trees are calculated by Voronoi- diagrams and potential densities are estimated from the comparable pure stands, yield tables, and published equations for maximum basal area and Reineke’s maximum density line.</p><p><em>Main results:</em> The species proportions estimated by the individual tree approach with leaf area as growth characteristic gave the best fit with the stand approach with the most appropriate, regional maximum basal area equations. By using various definitions of species proportions, in the worst case the mixing effects on individual species can be seriously over- or underestimated while the mixing effects on the total increment is only negligibly affected.</p><p><em>Research highlights</em></p><ul><li>Measures of species proportions by area are needed for comparing growth per hectare of a species in a mixed stand with that of the same species in a pure stand</li><li>Species proportions at the stand level are based on estimates of the species’ potential densities, either in terms of maximum basal area or of maximum stand density index</li><li>Species proportions at the tree level are derived from the area potentially available (APA) to the individual trees, based on the coordinates of trees in the stands, and on their growth characteristics, such as crown projection area or leaf area</li><li>For the examples of Norway spruce - European beech stands, the species proportions derived according to the individual tree approach using leaf area as growth characteristics fits best with the stand approach using the most appropriate maximum basal area equations</li></ul><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> <em>Picea abies</em>; <em>Fagus sylvatica;</em> mixture proportion; growth efficiency; mixing effect.</p><strong>Abbreviations used: </strong>APA – area potentially available.http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/fs/article/view/6027
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gerald F. Dirnberger
Hubert Sterba
spellingShingle Gerald F. Dirnberger
Hubert Sterba
A comparison of different methods to estimate species proportions by area in mixed stands
Forest Systems
author_facet Gerald F. Dirnberger
Hubert Sterba
author_sort Gerald F. Dirnberger
title A comparison of different methods to estimate species proportions by area in mixed stands
title_short A comparison of different methods to estimate species proportions by area in mixed stands
title_full A comparison of different methods to estimate species proportions by area in mixed stands
title_fullStr A comparison of different methods to estimate species proportions by area in mixed stands
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of different methods to estimate species proportions by area in mixed stands
title_sort comparison of different methods to estimate species proportions by area in mixed stands
publisher Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria
series Forest Systems
issn 2171-9845
publishDate 2014-12-01
description <p><em>Aim of the study:</em> This paper presents the most appropriate ways to estimate the species proportions by area in mixed stands of Norway spruce (<em>Picea abies</em> L. Karst.) and European beech (<em>Fagus sylvatica</em> L.) by comparing stand level and individual tree level approaches. It also investigates whether different ways of describing species proportions by area can result in different judgments on the over- or under-yielding of species in mixtures.</p><p><em>Area of the study:</em> Three triplets of pure and mixed stands of Norway spruce and European beech in three locations in the northeast of Austria are investigated. The three locations differ considerably in slope, bedrock and soil type as well as in site index.</p><p><em>Material and Methods:</em> In all 9 plots the coordinates of all trees, their dbh, height, height to the crown base and five year increment were measured. The potentially available areas of individual trees are calculated by Voronoi- diagrams and potential densities are estimated from the comparable pure stands, yield tables, and published equations for maximum basal area and Reineke’s maximum density line.</p><p><em>Main results:</em> The species proportions estimated by the individual tree approach with leaf area as growth characteristic gave the best fit with the stand approach with the most appropriate, regional maximum basal area equations. By using various definitions of species proportions, in the worst case the mixing effects on individual species can be seriously over- or underestimated while the mixing effects on the total increment is only negligibly affected.</p><p><em>Research highlights</em></p><ul><li>Measures of species proportions by area are needed for comparing growth per hectare of a species in a mixed stand with that of the same species in a pure stand</li><li>Species proportions at the stand level are based on estimates of the species’ potential densities, either in terms of maximum basal area or of maximum stand density index</li><li>Species proportions at the tree level are derived from the area potentially available (APA) to the individual trees, based on the coordinates of trees in the stands, and on their growth characteristics, such as crown projection area or leaf area</li><li>For the examples of Norway spruce - European beech stands, the species proportions derived according to the individual tree approach using leaf area as growth characteristics fits best with the stand approach using the most appropriate maximum basal area equations</li></ul><p><strong>Keywords:</strong> <em>Picea abies</em>; <em>Fagus sylvatica;</em> mixture proportion; growth efficiency; mixing effect.</p><strong>Abbreviations used: </strong>APA – area potentially available.
url http://revistas.inia.es/index.php/fs/article/view/6027
work_keys_str_mv AT geraldfdirnberger acomparisonofdifferentmethodstoestimatespeciesproportionsbyareainmixedstands
AT hubertsterba acomparisonofdifferentmethodstoestimatespeciesproportionsbyareainmixedstands
AT geraldfdirnberger comparisonofdifferentmethodstoestimatespeciesproportionsbyareainmixedstands
AT hubertsterba comparisonofdifferentmethodstoestimatespeciesproportionsbyareainmixedstands
_version_ 1725395159656431616