Effects of varying retention tree patterns on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) taxonomic and functional diversity

Abstract Managing forests intensively for timber production can homogenize forest structure and, in turn, alter species richness and functional composition of native species communities. Retention forestry, the practice of retaining structural elements during timber harvest, can increase species div...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sean M. Sultaire, Andrew J. Kroll, Jake Verschuyl, Douglas A. Landis, Gary J. Roloff
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-07-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3641
id doaj-22599933c1c545c0b9513f7ff5e12043
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22599933c1c545c0b9513f7ff5e120432021-07-29T10:34:35ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252021-07-01127n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.3641Effects of varying retention tree patterns on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) taxonomic and functional diversitySean M. Sultaire0Andrew J. Kroll1Jake Verschuyl2Douglas A. Landis3Gary J. Roloff4Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 480 Wilson Road East Lansing Michigan 48824 USAWeyerhaeuser 785 N 42nd Street Springfield Oregon 97478 USANational Council for Air and Stream Improvement P.O. Box 1259 Anacortes Washington 98221 USADepartment of Entomology Michigan State University 578 Wilson Road East Lansing Michigan 48824 USADepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife Michigan State University 480 Wilson Road East Lansing Michigan 48824 USAAbstract Managing forests intensively for timber production can homogenize forest structure and, in turn, alter species richness and functional composition of native species communities. Retention forestry, the practice of retaining structural elements during timber harvest, can increase species diversity in recently harvested forests, but its effect on functional trait diversity is less understood. We used a broad‐scale, replicated experiment to evaluate the effect of five tree retention patterns on species and functional trait diversity of ground beetles (Family: Carabidae) within early‐seral production forests in the Pacific Northwest, USA. We found no evidence for differences in carabid species or functional trait richness among treatments when considering species present in retention patches and adjacent clear‐cuts. However, we found evidence for lower taxonomic and functional trait variation between carabid communities present in retention patches and those present in clear‐cut areas of stands when retention was allocated to several small patches. Lower levels of functional trait variation in stands with several small patches were due to specialized predators found less often in small retention patches than in aggregated or riparian retention patches. Our findings indicate that relative to single large or riparian‐associated patches, small retention patches functioned similarly to clear‐cuts within harvested forests and several small patches did not increase species or functional trait richness. At current levels of retention in the region, allocation of trees to a single upland patch or split between riparian and upland patches can increase variation in ground beetle taxonomic and functional composition within harvested forests.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3641aggregated retentioncarabid beetlesfunctional diversityfunctional dissimilarityretention forestrytrait probability density
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sean M. Sultaire
Andrew J. Kroll
Jake Verschuyl
Douglas A. Landis
Gary J. Roloff
spellingShingle Sean M. Sultaire
Andrew J. Kroll
Jake Verschuyl
Douglas A. Landis
Gary J. Roloff
Effects of varying retention tree patterns on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) taxonomic and functional diversity
Ecosphere
aggregated retention
carabid beetles
functional diversity
functional dissimilarity
retention forestry
trait probability density
author_facet Sean M. Sultaire
Andrew J. Kroll
Jake Verschuyl
Douglas A. Landis
Gary J. Roloff
author_sort Sean M. Sultaire
title Effects of varying retention tree patterns on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) taxonomic and functional diversity
title_short Effects of varying retention tree patterns on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) taxonomic and functional diversity
title_full Effects of varying retention tree patterns on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) taxonomic and functional diversity
title_fullStr Effects of varying retention tree patterns on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) taxonomic and functional diversity
title_full_unstemmed Effects of varying retention tree patterns on ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) taxonomic and functional diversity
title_sort effects of varying retention tree patterns on ground beetle (coleoptera: carabidae) taxonomic and functional diversity
publisher Wiley
series Ecosphere
issn 2150-8925
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Abstract Managing forests intensively for timber production can homogenize forest structure and, in turn, alter species richness and functional composition of native species communities. Retention forestry, the practice of retaining structural elements during timber harvest, can increase species diversity in recently harvested forests, but its effect on functional trait diversity is less understood. We used a broad‐scale, replicated experiment to evaluate the effect of five tree retention patterns on species and functional trait diversity of ground beetles (Family: Carabidae) within early‐seral production forests in the Pacific Northwest, USA. We found no evidence for differences in carabid species or functional trait richness among treatments when considering species present in retention patches and adjacent clear‐cuts. However, we found evidence for lower taxonomic and functional trait variation between carabid communities present in retention patches and those present in clear‐cut areas of stands when retention was allocated to several small patches. Lower levels of functional trait variation in stands with several small patches were due to specialized predators found less often in small retention patches than in aggregated or riparian retention patches. Our findings indicate that relative to single large or riparian‐associated patches, small retention patches functioned similarly to clear‐cuts within harvested forests and several small patches did not increase species or functional trait richness. At current levels of retention in the region, allocation of trees to a single upland patch or split between riparian and upland patches can increase variation in ground beetle taxonomic and functional composition within harvested forests.
topic aggregated retention
carabid beetles
functional diversity
functional dissimilarity
retention forestry
trait probability density
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3641
work_keys_str_mv AT seanmsultaire effectsofvaryingretentiontreepatternsongroundbeetlecoleopteracarabidaetaxonomicandfunctionaldiversity
AT andrewjkroll effectsofvaryingretentiontreepatternsongroundbeetlecoleopteracarabidaetaxonomicandfunctionaldiversity
AT jakeverschuyl effectsofvaryingretentiontreepatternsongroundbeetlecoleopteracarabidaetaxonomicandfunctionaldiversity
AT douglasalandis effectsofvaryingretentiontreepatternsongroundbeetlecoleopteracarabidaetaxonomicandfunctionaldiversity
AT garyjroloff effectsofvaryingretentiontreepatternsongroundbeetlecoleopteracarabidaetaxonomicandfunctionaldiversity
_version_ 1721248909080133632