EFEKTIVITAS PIDANA PEMBAYARAN UANG PENGGANTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Studi Putusan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto)
This punishment is proved not effective because there were only two person punished who repaid. The rest failed to do so due either to lack of money or liquid assets. Instead they signed a letter stating their inability to repay the corrupted money and their readiness to undergo subsidiary punishmen...
Main Author: | Ade Paul Lukas |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Jenderal Soedirman University
2010-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Dinamika Hukum |
Online Access: | http://dinamikahukum.fh.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/JDH/article/view/142 |
Similar Items
-
EFEKTIVITAS PIDANA PEMBAYARAN UANG PENGGANTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Studi Putusan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Pengadilan Negeri Purwokerto)
by: Ade Paul Lukas
Published: (2010-05-01) -
PELAKSANAAN PEMBAYARAN UANG PENGGANTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
by: Indra Hafid Rahman, et al.
Published: (2016-03-01) -
MENYOAL PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI
by: Eddy O.S Hiariej
Published: (2013-01-01) -
KOMPETENSI PENGADILAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DALAM MENGADILI TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG
by: Edward Samosir
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Kajian Terhadap Pidana Penjara Sebagai Subsidair Pidana Tambahan Pembayaran Uang Pengganti Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi
by: Christine Juliana Sinaga
Published: (2017-09-01)