Attitude Markers in Sports News: A Corpus-based Study of Native and Non-Native Discourse

Martin and White’s (2005) appraisal theory explores the ways through which evaluative use of language expresses the interpersonal meanings in a text. Despite numerous studies using the appraisal framework, there is little research done on the comparison of appraisal resources used by native and non-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nazia Anwar, Behzad Anwar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Corpus Research Center 2021-03-01
Series:Corporum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.au.edu.pk/ojscrc/index.php/crc/article/view/101
id doaj-22795d6a71b0405f912ee80f4e8b1618
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22795d6a71b0405f912ee80f4e8b16182021-06-21T06:37:19ZengCorpus Research CenterCorporum2617-29172707-787X2021-03-0132121Attitude Markers in Sports News: A Corpus-based Study of Native and Non-Native DiscourseNazia Anwar, Behzad AnwarMartin and White’s (2005) appraisal theory explores the ways through which evaluative use of language expresses the interpersonal meanings in a text. Despite numerous studies using the appraisal framework, there is little research done on the comparison of appraisal resources used by native and non-native English news writers in discourse produced on the same task. A corpus of 1 million each of native and non-native sports news discourse is compiled from (Britain) native and (Pakistani) non-native online English newspapers, to which the appraisal framework is applied in the current study, comparing the ideological positions and evaluative standpoints of native and non-native sports news writers in sports news discourse. A mixed-method design is applied to carry out the sequential explanatory analysis of the data. The findings indicate the substantial variation in the evaluative use of attitudinal resources when used positively and negatively in native and non-native corpora. In general non-native sports, news writers have used significantly higher frequency of positive and negative attitudinal markers as compared to the native news writers. Non-native news writers have used more affect resources while native news writers have used appreciation resources abundantly as compared to affect and judgment resources. Findings offer further variation in the evaluative stance of native and non-native sports news writers that may be used for studying the difference in academic and non-academic writing styles.http://journals.au.edu.pk/ojscrc/index.php/crc/article/view/101attitudinal markersevaluative languagenativenon-nativesports-news
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nazia Anwar, Behzad Anwar
spellingShingle Nazia Anwar, Behzad Anwar
Attitude Markers in Sports News: A Corpus-based Study of Native and Non-Native Discourse
Corporum
attitudinal markers
evaluative language
native
non-native
sports-news
author_facet Nazia Anwar, Behzad Anwar
author_sort Nazia Anwar, Behzad Anwar
title Attitude Markers in Sports News: A Corpus-based Study of Native and Non-Native Discourse
title_short Attitude Markers in Sports News: A Corpus-based Study of Native and Non-Native Discourse
title_full Attitude Markers in Sports News: A Corpus-based Study of Native and Non-Native Discourse
title_fullStr Attitude Markers in Sports News: A Corpus-based Study of Native and Non-Native Discourse
title_full_unstemmed Attitude Markers in Sports News: A Corpus-based Study of Native and Non-Native Discourse
title_sort attitude markers in sports news: a corpus-based study of native and non-native discourse
publisher Corpus Research Center
series Corporum
issn 2617-2917
2707-787X
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Martin and White’s (2005) appraisal theory explores the ways through which evaluative use of language expresses the interpersonal meanings in a text. Despite numerous studies using the appraisal framework, there is little research done on the comparison of appraisal resources used by native and non-native English news writers in discourse produced on the same task. A corpus of 1 million each of native and non-native sports news discourse is compiled from (Britain) native and (Pakistani) non-native online English newspapers, to which the appraisal framework is applied in the current study, comparing the ideological positions and evaluative standpoints of native and non-native sports news writers in sports news discourse. A mixed-method design is applied to carry out the sequential explanatory analysis of the data. The findings indicate the substantial variation in the evaluative use of attitudinal resources when used positively and negatively in native and non-native corpora. In general non-native sports, news writers have used significantly higher frequency of positive and negative attitudinal markers as compared to the native news writers. Non-native news writers have used more affect resources while native news writers have used appreciation resources abundantly as compared to affect and judgment resources. Findings offer further variation in the evaluative stance of native and non-native sports news writers that may be used for studying the difference in academic and non-academic writing styles.
topic attitudinal markers
evaluative language
native
non-native
sports-news
url http://journals.au.edu.pk/ojscrc/index.php/crc/article/view/101
work_keys_str_mv AT naziaanwarbehzadanwar attitudemarkersinsportsnewsacorpusbasedstudyofnativeandnonnativediscourse
_version_ 1721368716230262784