Introduction

Who is a Hindu? was the famous subtitle chosen by Savarkar for his nationalist pamphlet founding the Hindutva ideology in 19231. We know about the legal difficulties faced by the British (among others) to define Hindus and Hinduism, and the resulting solution, which defined being Hindu by default: b...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mathieu Claveyrolas, Anthony Goreau-Ponceaud, Delon Madavan, Éric Meyer, Pierre-Yves Trouillet
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Edinburgh Library 2018-10-01
Series:The South Asianist
Online Access:http://www.southasianist.ed.ac.uk/article/view/2837
id doaj-22c68d61b51f4ec7b32b1033de870cb7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22c68d61b51f4ec7b32b1033de870cb72021-09-13T09:04:33ZengUniversity of Edinburgh LibraryThe South Asianist2050-487X2018-10-016122222837IntroductionMathieu Claveyrolas0Anthony Goreau-Ponceaud1Delon Madavan2Éric Meyer3Pierre-Yves Trouillet4Centre for South Asian Studies (EHESS/CNRS)University of Bordeaux, UMR 5115 LAM, "Sciences Po" BordeauxCentre d'études de l'Inde et l'Asie du Sud (EHESS/CNRS)Centre d'études et de recherche de l'Inde, l'Asie du Sud et sa diaspora (UQAM)Centre d’Etudes de l’Inde et de l’Asie du Sud (CNRS/EHESS)French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), UMR 5319 "Passages"Who is a Hindu? was the famous subtitle chosen by Savarkar for his nationalist pamphlet founding the Hindutva ideology in 19231. We know about the legal difficulties faced by the British (among others) to define Hindus and Hinduism, and the resulting solution, which defined being Hindu by default: being Hindu meant not being Muslim, nor Christian, nor Sikh, nor Buddhist, nor anything else. This is a rather extreme example of the necessity to define the Other when it comes to defining oneself (Mohammad-Arid & Ripert 2014). Following a workshop held in Paris in 20152, the purpose of this special issue is to start from the Sri Lankan case to study how Hinduism and Hindus define others and interact with them, and what these interactions reveal about Hinduism in general and about Sri Lankan Hinduism in particular, especially regarding religious, social, political and territorial issues. By addressing relations to the Other from the Hindu point of view, the issue proposes more broadly to develop a critical conception of Hinduism that considers this religion as a point of contact between various social and religious groups. Indeed, we argue that questioning the importance of these multiple realities of contact, whether they are recognised or denied, also helps to renew the debate about the challenges of defining Hinduism, articulated by both Hindus and scholars.http://www.southasianist.ed.ac.uk/article/view/2837
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mathieu Claveyrolas
Anthony Goreau-Ponceaud
Delon Madavan
Éric Meyer
Pierre-Yves Trouillet
spellingShingle Mathieu Claveyrolas
Anthony Goreau-Ponceaud
Delon Madavan
Éric Meyer
Pierre-Yves Trouillet
Introduction
The South Asianist
author_facet Mathieu Claveyrolas
Anthony Goreau-Ponceaud
Delon Madavan
Éric Meyer
Pierre-Yves Trouillet
author_sort Mathieu Claveyrolas
title Introduction
title_short Introduction
title_full Introduction
title_fullStr Introduction
title_full_unstemmed Introduction
title_sort introduction
publisher University of Edinburgh Library
series The South Asianist
issn 2050-487X
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Who is a Hindu? was the famous subtitle chosen by Savarkar for his nationalist pamphlet founding the Hindutva ideology in 19231. We know about the legal difficulties faced by the British (among others) to define Hindus and Hinduism, and the resulting solution, which defined being Hindu by default: being Hindu meant not being Muslim, nor Christian, nor Sikh, nor Buddhist, nor anything else. This is a rather extreme example of the necessity to define the Other when it comes to defining oneself (Mohammad-Arid & Ripert 2014). Following a workshop held in Paris in 20152, the purpose of this special issue is to start from the Sri Lankan case to study how Hinduism and Hindus define others and interact with them, and what these interactions reveal about Hinduism in general and about Sri Lankan Hinduism in particular, especially regarding religious, social, political and territorial issues. By addressing relations to the Other from the Hindu point of view, the issue proposes more broadly to develop a critical conception of Hinduism that considers this religion as a point of contact between various social and religious groups. Indeed, we argue that questioning the importance of these multiple realities of contact, whether they are recognised or denied, also helps to renew the debate about the challenges of defining Hinduism, articulated by both Hindus and scholars.
url http://www.southasianist.ed.ac.uk/article/view/2837
work_keys_str_mv AT mathieuclaveyrolas introduction
AT anthonygoreauponceaud introduction
AT delonmadavan introduction
AT ericmeyer introduction
AT pierreyvestrouillet introduction
_version_ 1717381162708500480