Clinical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy in vault prolapse

Objectives: To describe the clinical outcome of patients undergoing abdominal sacrocolpopexy for posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Methods: This is a prospective observational study over a period of 2 years among patients who underwent the procedure. Demographic characteristics, POP-Q staging, intrao...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aparna Patil, Sheela HS, Madhva Prasad S, Samskruti Reddy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Barpeta Obstetrics and Gynaecological Society 2021-01-01
Series:New Indian Journal of OBGYN
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.barpetaogs.co.in/pdf/07168.pdf
id doaj-22d4bbb761c04f599257d15d9c8c1102
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22d4bbb761c04f599257d15d9c8c11022021-01-30T12:14:37ZengBarpeta Obstetrics and Gynaecological SocietyNew Indian Journal of OBGYN2454-23342454-23422021-01-017216817110.21276/obgyn.2021.7.2.11Clinical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy in vault prolapseAparna Patil0Sheela HS1Madhva Prasad S2Samskruti Reddy3Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Whitefield, Bangalore, IndiaProfessor and Unit Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Whitefield, Bangalore, IndiaAssociate Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Whitefield, Bangalore, India Junior Resident, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Whitefield, Bangalore, IndiaObjectives: To describe the clinical outcome of patients undergoing abdominal sacrocolpopexy for posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Methods: This is a prospective observational study over a period of 2 years among patients who underwent the procedure. Demographic characteristics, POP-Q staging, intraoperative events, postoperative outcomes and complications were noted. Follow-up regarding outcome was done at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. Results: 15 patients were studied with a mean age of 52 years and mean parity of 3. Most of the patients had stage 3 or 4 vault prolapse. Intraoperative complications were encountered in 3 patients (one bladder injury, one bowel injury and one excessive hemorrhage) which were managed appropriately. On short term follow up one patient had dyspareunia and one patient had urinary dysfunction. Long term follow-up showed one patient having chronic pelvic pain. None of the patients had recurrence of vault prolapse. Conclusion: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is a safe and an effective procedure for vault prolapse.https://journal.barpetaogs.co.in/pdf/07168.pdfvault prolapseposthysterectomy prolapse
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aparna Patil
Sheela HS
Madhva Prasad S
Samskruti Reddy
spellingShingle Aparna Patil
Sheela HS
Madhva Prasad S
Samskruti Reddy
Clinical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy in vault prolapse
New Indian Journal of OBGYN
vault prolapse
posthysterectomy prolapse
author_facet Aparna Patil
Sheela HS
Madhva Prasad S
Samskruti Reddy
author_sort Aparna Patil
title Clinical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy in vault prolapse
title_short Clinical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy in vault prolapse
title_full Clinical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy in vault prolapse
title_fullStr Clinical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy in vault prolapse
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy in vault prolapse
title_sort clinical outcome of abdominal sacrocolpopexy in vault prolapse
publisher Barpeta Obstetrics and Gynaecological Society
series New Indian Journal of OBGYN
issn 2454-2334
2454-2342
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Objectives: To describe the clinical outcome of patients undergoing abdominal sacrocolpopexy for posthysterectomy vault prolapse. Methods: This is a prospective observational study over a period of 2 years among patients who underwent the procedure. Demographic characteristics, POP-Q staging, intraoperative events, postoperative outcomes and complications were noted. Follow-up regarding outcome was done at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year. Results: 15 patients were studied with a mean age of 52 years and mean parity of 3. Most of the patients had stage 3 or 4 vault prolapse. Intraoperative complications were encountered in 3 patients (one bladder injury, one bowel injury and one excessive hemorrhage) which were managed appropriately. On short term follow up one patient had dyspareunia and one patient had urinary dysfunction. Long term follow-up showed one patient having chronic pelvic pain. None of the patients had recurrence of vault prolapse. Conclusion: Abdominal sacrocolpopexy is a safe and an effective procedure for vault prolapse.
topic vault prolapse
posthysterectomy prolapse
url https://journal.barpetaogs.co.in/pdf/07168.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT aparnapatil clinicaloutcomeofabdominalsacrocolpopexyinvaultprolapse
AT sheelahs clinicaloutcomeofabdominalsacrocolpopexyinvaultprolapse
AT madhvaprasads clinicaloutcomeofabdominalsacrocolpopexyinvaultprolapse
AT samskrutireddy clinicaloutcomeofabdominalsacrocolpopexyinvaultprolapse
_version_ 1724317810814877696