Interobserver variability in clinical target volume delineation in anal squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract We evaluated the inter-physician variability in the target contouring of the radiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Clinical target volume (CTV) of three patients diagnosed with ASCC was delineated by seven experienced radiation oncologists from multi-institution. These patie...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyung Su Kim, Kwang-Ho Cheong, Kyubo Kim, Taeryool Koo, Hyeon Kang Koh, Ji Hyun Chang, Ah Ram Chang, Hae Jin Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-02-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82541-5
id doaj-22d7aa4645944c84831596e74ee079b8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22d7aa4645944c84831596e74ee079b82021-02-07T12:32:00ZengNature Publishing GroupScientific Reports2045-23222021-02-011111710.1038/s41598-021-82541-5Interobserver variability in clinical target volume delineation in anal squamous cell carcinomaKyung Su Kim0Kwang-Ho Cheong1Kyubo Kim2Taeryool Koo3Hyeon Kang Koh4Ji Hyun Chang5Ah Ram Chang6Hae Jin Park7Department of Radiation Oncology, Dongnam Institute of Radiological and Medical SciencesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Sacred Heart HospitalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of MedicineDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Sacred Heart HospitalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Konkuk University School of MedicineDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government, Seoul National University Boramae Medical CenterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of MedicineDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University College of MedicineAbstract We evaluated the inter-physician variability in the target contouring of the radiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Clinical target volume (CTV) of three patients diagnosed with ASCC was delineated by seven experienced radiation oncologists from multi-institution. These patients were staged as pT1N1a, cT2N0, and cT4N1a, respectively, according to 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Expert agreement was quantified using an expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE). The maximum distance from the boundaries of the STAPLE generated volume with confidence level of 80% to those of the contour of each CTV in 6 directions was compared. CTV of pelvis which includes primary tumor, perirectal tissue and internal/external iliac lymph node (LN) area (CTV-pelvis) and CTV of inguinal area (CTV-inguinal) were obtained from the seven radiation oncologists. One radiation oncologist did not contain inguinal LN area in the treatment target volume of patient 2 (cT2N0 stage). CTV-inguinal displayed moderate agreement for each patient (overall kappa 0.58, 0.54 and 0.6, respectively), whereas CTV-pelvis showed substantial agreement (overall kappa 0.66, 0.68 and 0.64, respectively). Largest variation among each contour was shown in the inferior margin of the CTV-inguinal. For CTV-pelvis, anterior and superior margin showed the biggest variation. Overall, moderate to substantial agreement was shown for CTV delineation. However, large variations in the anterior and cranial boarder of the CTV-pelvis and the caudal margin of the CTV-inguinal suggest that further studies are needed to establish a clearer target volume delineation guideline.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82541-5
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kyung Su Kim
Kwang-Ho Cheong
Kyubo Kim
Taeryool Koo
Hyeon Kang Koh
Ji Hyun Chang
Ah Ram Chang
Hae Jin Park
spellingShingle Kyung Su Kim
Kwang-Ho Cheong
Kyubo Kim
Taeryool Koo
Hyeon Kang Koh
Ji Hyun Chang
Ah Ram Chang
Hae Jin Park
Interobserver variability in clinical target volume delineation in anal squamous cell carcinoma
Scientific Reports
author_facet Kyung Su Kim
Kwang-Ho Cheong
Kyubo Kim
Taeryool Koo
Hyeon Kang Koh
Ji Hyun Chang
Ah Ram Chang
Hae Jin Park
author_sort Kyung Su Kim
title Interobserver variability in clinical target volume delineation in anal squamous cell carcinoma
title_short Interobserver variability in clinical target volume delineation in anal squamous cell carcinoma
title_full Interobserver variability in clinical target volume delineation in anal squamous cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Interobserver variability in clinical target volume delineation in anal squamous cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Interobserver variability in clinical target volume delineation in anal squamous cell carcinoma
title_sort interobserver variability in clinical target volume delineation in anal squamous cell carcinoma
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series Scientific Reports
issn 2045-2322
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract We evaluated the inter-physician variability in the target contouring of the radiotherapy for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). Clinical target volume (CTV) of three patients diagnosed with ASCC was delineated by seven experienced radiation oncologists from multi-institution. These patients were staged as pT1N1a, cT2N0, and cT4N1a, respectively, according to 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Expert agreement was quantified using an expectation maximization algorithm for Simultaneous Truth and Performance Level Estimation (STAPLE). The maximum distance from the boundaries of the STAPLE generated volume with confidence level of 80% to those of the contour of each CTV in 6 directions was compared. CTV of pelvis which includes primary tumor, perirectal tissue and internal/external iliac lymph node (LN) area (CTV-pelvis) and CTV of inguinal area (CTV-inguinal) were obtained from the seven radiation oncologists. One radiation oncologist did not contain inguinal LN area in the treatment target volume of patient 2 (cT2N0 stage). CTV-inguinal displayed moderate agreement for each patient (overall kappa 0.58, 0.54 and 0.6, respectively), whereas CTV-pelvis showed substantial agreement (overall kappa 0.66, 0.68 and 0.64, respectively). Largest variation among each contour was shown in the inferior margin of the CTV-inguinal. For CTV-pelvis, anterior and superior margin showed the biggest variation. Overall, moderate to substantial agreement was shown for CTV delineation. However, large variations in the anterior and cranial boarder of the CTV-pelvis and the caudal margin of the CTV-inguinal suggest that further studies are needed to establish a clearer target volume delineation guideline.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82541-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kyungsukim interobservervariabilityinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinanalsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT kwanghocheong interobservervariabilityinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinanalsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT kyubokim interobservervariabilityinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinanalsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT taeryoolkoo interobservervariabilityinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinanalsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT hyeonkangkoh interobservervariabilityinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinanalsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT jihyunchang interobservervariabilityinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinanalsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT ahramchang interobservervariabilityinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinanalsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT haejinpark interobservervariabilityinclinicaltargetvolumedelineationinanalsquamouscellcarcinoma
_version_ 1724280952869355520