Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of Genocide
This article offers a new portrait of Raphael Lemkin, as a historian of mass violence. It argues that, in contrast to recent characterizations that focus on Lemkin’s methodological amateurism, Lemkin was in fact highly attentive to the “Historian’s Craft.” Moreover, he was invested in employing a sp...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
International Association of Genocide Scholars
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.13.1.1586 |
id |
doaj-22da953478d24eb6995f980d87583db8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-22da953478d24eb6995f980d87583db82020-11-25T00:30:55ZengInternational Association of Genocide ScholarsGenocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal1911-03591911-99332019-04-01131426310.5038/1911-9933.13.1.1586Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of GenocideCharlotte Kiechel0Yale UniversityThis article offers a new portrait of Raphael Lemkin, as a historian of mass violence. It argues that, in contrast to recent characterizations that focus on Lemkin’s methodological amateurism, Lemkin was in fact highly attentive to the “Historian’s Craft.” Moreover, he was invested in employing a specific approach in writing his global History of Genocide. This approach revolved around his interest in psychology and frequently depended upon his psychologically attentive readings of testimonies. After detailing Lemkin’s psycho-cultural approach, this article compares his use and readings of victim testimony in his writings on mass violence in Western and non-Western societies. Ultimately, it argues that Lemkin’s methodology, source material, personal biography, and calls for “psychological relativism” all offer insight into one of the central tensions underlying Lemkin’s global history: his uneven attribution of psychological complexity and thus humanity to all victims of mass violence and genocide. The article concludes by reaffirming the import of Lemkin’s legacy amidst today’s “global turn.”https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.13.1.1586 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Charlotte Kiechel |
spellingShingle |
Charlotte Kiechel Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of Genocide Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal |
author_facet |
Charlotte Kiechel |
author_sort |
Charlotte Kiechel |
title |
Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of Genocide |
title_short |
Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of Genocide |
title_full |
Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of Genocide |
title_fullStr |
Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of Genocide |
title_full_unstemmed |
Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of Genocide |
title_sort |
legible testimonies: raphaël lemkin, the victim’s voice, and the global history of genocide |
publisher |
International Association of Genocide Scholars |
series |
Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal |
issn |
1911-0359 1911-9933 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
This article offers a new portrait of Raphael Lemkin, as a historian of mass violence. It argues that, in contrast to recent characterizations that focus on Lemkin’s methodological amateurism, Lemkin was in fact highly attentive to the “Historian’s Craft.” Moreover, he was invested in employing a specific approach in writing his global History of Genocide. This approach revolved around his interest in psychology and frequently depended upon his psychologically attentive readings of testimonies. After detailing Lemkin’s psycho-cultural approach, this article compares his use and readings of victim testimony in his writings on mass violence in Western and non-Western societies. Ultimately, it argues that Lemkin’s methodology, source material, personal biography, and calls for “psychological relativism” all offer insight into one of the central tensions underlying Lemkin’s global history: his uneven attribution of psychological complexity and thus humanity to all victims of mass violence and genocide. The article concludes by reaffirming the import of Lemkin’s legacy amidst today’s “global turn.” |
url |
https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.13.1.1586 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT charlottekiechel legibletestimoniesraphaellemkinthevictimsvoiceandtheglobalhistoryofgenocide |
_version_ |
1725324985201852416 |