Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of Genocide

This article offers a new portrait of Raphael Lemkin, as a historian of mass violence. It argues that, in contrast to recent characterizations that focus on Lemkin’s methodological amateurism, Lemkin was in fact highly attentive to the “Historian’s Craft.” Moreover, he was invested in employing a sp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Charlotte Kiechel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Association of Genocide Scholars 2019-04-01
Series:Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.13.1.1586
id doaj-22da953478d24eb6995f980d87583db8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22da953478d24eb6995f980d87583db82020-11-25T00:30:55ZengInternational Association of Genocide ScholarsGenocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal1911-03591911-99332019-04-01131426310.5038/1911-9933.13.1.1586Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of GenocideCharlotte Kiechel0Yale UniversityThis article offers a new portrait of Raphael Lemkin, as a historian of mass violence. It argues that, in contrast to recent characterizations that focus on Lemkin’s methodological amateurism, Lemkin was in fact highly attentive to the “Historian’s Craft.” Moreover, he was invested in employing a specific approach in writing his global History of Genocide. This approach revolved around his interest in psychology and frequently depended upon his psychologically attentive readings of testimonies. After detailing Lemkin’s psycho-cultural approach, this article compares his use and readings of victim testimony in his writings on mass violence in Western and non-Western societies. Ultimately, it argues that Lemkin’s methodology, source material, personal biography, and calls for “psychological relativism” all offer insight into one of the central tensions underlying Lemkin’s global history: his uneven attribution of psychological complexity and thus humanity to all victims of mass violence and genocide. The article concludes by reaffirming the import of Lemkin’s legacy amidst today’s “global turn.”https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.13.1.1586
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Charlotte Kiechel
spellingShingle Charlotte Kiechel
Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of Genocide
Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal
author_facet Charlotte Kiechel
author_sort Charlotte Kiechel
title Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of Genocide
title_short Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of Genocide
title_full Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of Genocide
title_fullStr Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of Genocide
title_full_unstemmed Legible Testimonies: Raphaël Lemkin, the Victim’s Voice, and the Global History of Genocide
title_sort legible testimonies: raphaël lemkin, the victim’s voice, and the global history of genocide
publisher International Association of Genocide Scholars
series Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal
issn 1911-0359
1911-9933
publishDate 2019-04-01
description This article offers a new portrait of Raphael Lemkin, as a historian of mass violence. It argues that, in contrast to recent characterizations that focus on Lemkin’s methodological amateurism, Lemkin was in fact highly attentive to the “Historian’s Craft.” Moreover, he was invested in employing a specific approach in writing his global History of Genocide. This approach revolved around his interest in psychology and frequently depended upon his psychologically attentive readings of testimonies. After detailing Lemkin’s psycho-cultural approach, this article compares his use and readings of victim testimony in his writings on mass violence in Western and non-Western societies. Ultimately, it argues that Lemkin’s methodology, source material, personal biography, and calls for “psychological relativism” all offer insight into one of the central tensions underlying Lemkin’s global history: his uneven attribution of psychological complexity and thus humanity to all victims of mass violence and genocide. The article concludes by reaffirming the import of Lemkin’s legacy amidst today’s “global turn.”
url https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.13.1.1586
work_keys_str_mv AT charlottekiechel legibletestimoniesraphaellemkinthevictimsvoiceandtheglobalhistoryofgenocide
_version_ 1725324985201852416