Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball Machine

The aim was to evaluate the reliability of a newly-developed ball machine named 'Hightof', on the field and to assess its accuracy. The experiment was conducted in the collaboration of the 'Hawk-Eye' technology. The accuracy and reliability of this ball machine were assessed duri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cyril Brechbuhl, Grégoire Millet, Laurent Schmitt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Uludag 2016-06-01
Series:Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jssm.org/researchjssm-15-263.xml.xml
id doaj-22ec2eb0a6524a67821ffa5dee24f080
record_format Article
spelling doaj-22ec2eb0a6524a67821ffa5dee24f0802020-11-25T01:23:43ZengUniversity of UludagJournal of Sports Science and Medicine1303-29682016-06-01152263267Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball MachineCyril Brechbuhl, Grégoire Millet, Laurent Schmitt0French Tennis Federation, Stade Roland-Garros, 2 avenue Gordon Bennett, Paris, FranceThe aim was to evaluate the reliability of a newly-developed ball machine named 'Hightof', on the field and to assess its accuracy. The experiment was conducted in the collaboration of the 'Hawk-Eye' technology. The accuracy and reliability of this ball machine were assessed during an incremental test, with 1 min of exercise and 30 sec of recovery, where the frequency of the balls increased from 10 to 30 balls·min-1. The initial frequency was 10 and increased by 2 until 22, then by 1 until 30 balls·min-1. The reference points for the impact were 8.39m from the net and 2.70m from lateral line for the right side and 2.83m for the left side. The precision of the machine was similar on the right and left sides (0.63 ± 0.39 vs 0.63 ± 0.34 m). The distances to the reference point were 0.52 ± 0.42, 0.26 ± 0.19, 0.52 ± 0.37, 0.28 ± 0.19 m for the Y-right, X-right, Y-left and X-left impacts. The precision was constant and did not increase with the intensity. (e.g ball frequency). The ball velocity was 86.3 ± 1.5 and 86.5 ± 1.3 km·h-1 for the right and the left side, respectively. The coefficient of variation for the velocity ranged between 1 and 2% in all stages (ball velocity ranging from 10 to 30 balls·min-1). Conclusion: both the accuracy and the reliability of this new ball machine appear satisfying enough for field testing and training.http://www.jssm.org/researchjssm-15-263.xml.xmlTechnologytennistestingtrainingball-machine
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cyril Brechbuhl, Grégoire Millet, Laurent Schmitt
spellingShingle Cyril Brechbuhl, Grégoire Millet, Laurent Schmitt
Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball Machine
Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
Technology
tennis
testing
training
ball-machine
author_facet Cyril Brechbuhl, Grégoire Millet, Laurent Schmitt
author_sort Cyril Brechbuhl, Grégoire Millet, Laurent Schmitt
title Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball Machine
title_short Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball Machine
title_full Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball Machine
title_fullStr Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball Machine
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy and Reliability of a New Tennis Ball Machine
title_sort accuracy and reliability of a new tennis ball machine
publisher University of Uludag
series Journal of Sports Science and Medicine
issn 1303-2968
publishDate 2016-06-01
description The aim was to evaluate the reliability of a newly-developed ball machine named 'Hightof', on the field and to assess its accuracy. The experiment was conducted in the collaboration of the 'Hawk-Eye' technology. The accuracy and reliability of this ball machine were assessed during an incremental test, with 1 min of exercise and 30 sec of recovery, where the frequency of the balls increased from 10 to 30 balls·min-1. The initial frequency was 10 and increased by 2 until 22, then by 1 until 30 balls·min-1. The reference points for the impact were 8.39m from the net and 2.70m from lateral line for the right side and 2.83m for the left side. The precision of the machine was similar on the right and left sides (0.63 ± 0.39 vs 0.63 ± 0.34 m). The distances to the reference point were 0.52 ± 0.42, 0.26 ± 0.19, 0.52 ± 0.37, 0.28 ± 0.19 m for the Y-right, X-right, Y-left and X-left impacts. The precision was constant and did not increase with the intensity. (e.g ball frequency). The ball velocity was 86.3 ± 1.5 and 86.5 ± 1.3 km·h-1 for the right and the left side, respectively. The coefficient of variation for the velocity ranged between 1 and 2% in all stages (ball velocity ranging from 10 to 30 balls·min-1). Conclusion: both the accuracy and the reliability of this new ball machine appear satisfying enough for field testing and training.
topic Technology
tennis
testing
training
ball-machine
url http://www.jssm.org/researchjssm-15-263.xml.xml
work_keys_str_mv AT cyrilbrechbuhlgregoiremilletlaurentschmitt accuracyandreliabilityofanewtennisballmachine
_version_ 1725120339386564608