Attitudes of people with inherited retinal conditions toward gene editing technology

Abstract Background The views of people with genetic conditions are crucial to include in public dialogue around developing gene editing technologies. This qualitative study sought to characterize the attitudes of people with inherited retinal conditions (retinitis pigmentosa [RP] and Leber congenit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lily Hoffman‐Andrews, Ronit Mazzoni, Michelle Pacione, Rosemarie Garland‐Thomson, Kelly E. Ormond
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-07-01
Series:Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.803
Description
Summary:Abstract Background The views of people with genetic conditions are crucial to include in public dialogue around developing gene editing technologies. This qualitative study sought to characterize the attitudes of people with inherited retinal conditions (retinitis pigmentosa [RP] and Leber congenital amaurosis [LCA]) toward gene editing. Methods Individuals with RP (N = 9) and LCA (N = 8) participated in semi‐structured qualitative interviews about their experience with and attitudes toward blindness, and their views about gene editing technology for somatic, germline, and enhancement applications. Results Participants saw potential benefits from gene editing in general, but views about its use for retinal conditions varied and were influenced by personal perspectives on blindness. Those who felt more negatively toward blindness, particularly those with later onset blindness, were more supportive of gene editing for retinal conditions. Concerns about both germline and somatic editing included: the importance of informed consent; impacts of gene editing on social attitudes and barriers affecting blind people; and worries about “eliminating” blindness or other traits. Conclusion People with RP and LCA have diverse attitudes toward gene editing technology informed by their own lived experience with disability, and many have concerns about how the ways in which it is discussed and implemented might affect them.
ISSN:2324-9269