Language and Color Perception: Evidence From Mongolian and Chinese Speakers

The present research contributes to the debate in cognitive sentence on the relationship between language and perception by comparing Mongolian and Chinese speakers’ color perception. In this study, featuring a free sorting task and a visual search task comparing Mongolian and Chinese performances,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hu He, Jie Li, Qianguo Xiao, Songxiu Jiang, Yisheng Yang, Sheng Zhi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00551/full
id doaj-2323667132c84b85bd2848e91215ff8f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2323667132c84b85bd2848e91215ff8f2020-11-24T21:17:44ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-03-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.00551413838Language and Color Perception: Evidence From Mongolian and Chinese SpeakersHu He0Jie Li1Jie Li2Qianguo Xiao3Songxiu Jiang4Yisheng Yang5Sheng Zhi6College of Educational Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, ChinaCollege of Educational Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, ChinaInner Mongolia Autonomous Region Key Laboratory of Psychology, Hohhot, ChinaLaboratory of Cognition and Mental Health, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, ChinaSchool of Education, Liaocheng University, Liaocheng, ChinaCollege of Educational Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, ChinaCollege of Educational Science, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot, ChinaThe present research contributes to the debate in cognitive sentence on the relationship between language and perception by comparing Mongolian and Chinese speakers’ color perception. In this study, featuring a free sorting task and a visual search task comparing Mongolian and Chinese performances, the results show that both universal and relativistic forces are at play. Chinese (Mandarin) and Mongolian color terms divide the blue spectrum differently but the green spectrum, similarly. In Mongolian, light blue (“qinker”) and dark blue (“huhe”) are strictly distinct, while both light green and dark green are described as one word, nogvgan. In Chinese, however, both light blue and dark blue are simply described by one word, lan, and both light green and dark green are described by a single word, lv. The current study used a free-sorting task and a visual search task to investigate whether this linguistic difference between Chinese and Mongolian speakers leads to a difference in color discrimination. In the free-sorting task, compared with Chinese speakers, Mongolian speakers exhibited different sorting in the blue region (by distinguishing light and dark blue) and the same sorting in the green region. Further results showed that Mongolian speakers discriminated visual search displays that fall into different linguistic categories in Mongolian (e.g., qinker or huhe) more quickly than visual search displays that belong to the same linguistic category (e.g., both qinker) in a visual search task. Moreover, this effect was disrupted in Mongolian participants who performed a secondary task engaging involving verbal working memory (but not a task engaging involving spatial working memory), suggested linguistic interference. Chinese (Mandarin) speakers performing the visual search task did not show such a category advantage under any of the conditions. The finding provides support for the Whorf hypothesis with evidence from an Altay language. Meanwhile, both Chinese and Mongolian speakers reacted faster to the green color than the blue color in the visual search task, suggesting that the variation in human color perception is constrained by certain universal forces. The difference in categorical effects between Chinese and Mongolian speakers in the blue region suggests a relativistic aspect of language and color perception, while the speed of visual search in blue and green suggests a universalistic aspect of language and color perception. Thus, our findings suggest that our perception is shaped by both relativistic and universal forces.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00551/fulllanguageperceptionMongolianChinesecolor categorical perceptionuniversal hypothesis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hu He
Jie Li
Jie Li
Qianguo Xiao
Songxiu Jiang
Yisheng Yang
Sheng Zhi
spellingShingle Hu He
Jie Li
Jie Li
Qianguo Xiao
Songxiu Jiang
Yisheng Yang
Sheng Zhi
Language and Color Perception: Evidence From Mongolian and Chinese Speakers
Frontiers in Psychology
language
perception
Mongolian
Chinese
color categorical perception
universal hypothesis
author_facet Hu He
Jie Li
Jie Li
Qianguo Xiao
Songxiu Jiang
Yisheng Yang
Sheng Zhi
author_sort Hu He
title Language and Color Perception: Evidence From Mongolian and Chinese Speakers
title_short Language and Color Perception: Evidence From Mongolian and Chinese Speakers
title_full Language and Color Perception: Evidence From Mongolian and Chinese Speakers
title_fullStr Language and Color Perception: Evidence From Mongolian and Chinese Speakers
title_full_unstemmed Language and Color Perception: Evidence From Mongolian and Chinese Speakers
title_sort language and color perception: evidence from mongolian and chinese speakers
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2019-03-01
description The present research contributes to the debate in cognitive sentence on the relationship between language and perception by comparing Mongolian and Chinese speakers’ color perception. In this study, featuring a free sorting task and a visual search task comparing Mongolian and Chinese performances, the results show that both universal and relativistic forces are at play. Chinese (Mandarin) and Mongolian color terms divide the blue spectrum differently but the green spectrum, similarly. In Mongolian, light blue (“qinker”) and dark blue (“huhe”) are strictly distinct, while both light green and dark green are described as one word, nogvgan. In Chinese, however, both light blue and dark blue are simply described by one word, lan, and both light green and dark green are described by a single word, lv. The current study used a free-sorting task and a visual search task to investigate whether this linguistic difference between Chinese and Mongolian speakers leads to a difference in color discrimination. In the free-sorting task, compared with Chinese speakers, Mongolian speakers exhibited different sorting in the blue region (by distinguishing light and dark blue) and the same sorting in the green region. Further results showed that Mongolian speakers discriminated visual search displays that fall into different linguistic categories in Mongolian (e.g., qinker or huhe) more quickly than visual search displays that belong to the same linguistic category (e.g., both qinker) in a visual search task. Moreover, this effect was disrupted in Mongolian participants who performed a secondary task engaging involving verbal working memory (but not a task engaging involving spatial working memory), suggested linguistic interference. Chinese (Mandarin) speakers performing the visual search task did not show such a category advantage under any of the conditions. The finding provides support for the Whorf hypothesis with evidence from an Altay language. Meanwhile, both Chinese and Mongolian speakers reacted faster to the green color than the blue color in the visual search task, suggesting that the variation in human color perception is constrained by certain universal forces. The difference in categorical effects between Chinese and Mongolian speakers in the blue region suggests a relativistic aspect of language and color perception, while the speed of visual search in blue and green suggests a universalistic aspect of language and color perception. Thus, our findings suggest that our perception is shaped by both relativistic and universal forces.
topic language
perception
Mongolian
Chinese
color categorical perception
universal hypothesis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00551/full
work_keys_str_mv AT huhe languageandcolorperceptionevidencefrommongolianandchinesespeakers
AT jieli languageandcolorperceptionevidencefrommongolianandchinesespeakers
AT jieli languageandcolorperceptionevidencefrommongolianandchinesespeakers
AT qianguoxiao languageandcolorperceptionevidencefrommongolianandchinesespeakers
AT songxiujiang languageandcolorperceptionevidencefrommongolianandchinesespeakers
AT yishengyang languageandcolorperceptionevidencefrommongolianandchinesespeakers
AT shengzhi languageandcolorperceptionevidencefrommongolianandchinesespeakers
_version_ 1726012467368165376