Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and Recommendations

Despite the need for quality land cover information, large-area, high spatial resolution land cover mapping has proven to be a difficult task for a variety of reasons including large data volumes, complexity of developing training and validation datasets, data availability, and heterogeneity in data...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aaron E. Maxwell, Michael P. Strager, Timothy A. Warner, Christopher A. Ramezan, Alice N. Morgan, Cameron E. Pauley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-06-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/12/1409
id doaj-232e82a85de24621aba2ee93e06d4000
record_format Article
spelling doaj-232e82a85de24621aba2ee93e06d40002020-11-25T01:14:02ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922019-06-011112140910.3390/rs11121409rs11121409Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and RecommendationsAaron E. Maxwell0Michael P. Strager1Timothy A. Warner2Christopher A. Ramezan3Alice N. Morgan4Cameron E. Pauley5Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USADavis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Design, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USADepartment of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USADepartment of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USADavis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Design, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USADepartment of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USADespite the need for quality land cover information, large-area, high spatial resolution land cover mapping has proven to be a difficult task for a variety of reasons including large data volumes, complexity of developing training and validation datasets, data availability, and heterogeneity in data and landscape conditions. We investigate the use of geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA), random forest (RF) machine learning, and National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) orthophotography for mapping general land cover across the entire state of West Virginia, USA, an area of roughly 62,000 km<sup>2</sup>. We obtained an overall accuracy of 96.7% and a Kappa statistic of 0.886 using a combination of NAIP orthophotography and ancillary data. Despite the high overall classification accuracy, some classes were difficult to differentiate, as highlight by the low user&#8217;s and producer&#8217;s accuracies for the barren, impervious, and mixed developed classes. In contrast, forest, low vegetation, and water were generally mapped with accuracy. The inclusion of ancillary data and first- and second-order textural measures generally improved classification accuracy whereas band indices and object geometric measures were less valuable. Including super-object attributes improved the classification slightly; however, this increased the computational time and complexity. From the findings of this research and previous studies, recommendations are provided for mapping large spatial extents.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/12/1409land coverland cover mappingobject-based image analysisGEOBIAmachine learningrandom forestsNational Agriculture Imagery ProgramNAIP
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aaron E. Maxwell
Michael P. Strager
Timothy A. Warner
Christopher A. Ramezan
Alice N. Morgan
Cameron E. Pauley
spellingShingle Aaron E. Maxwell
Michael P. Strager
Timothy A. Warner
Christopher A. Ramezan
Alice N. Morgan
Cameron E. Pauley
Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and Recommendations
Remote Sensing
land cover
land cover mapping
object-based image analysis
GEOBIA
machine learning
random forests
National Agriculture Imagery Program
NAIP
author_facet Aaron E. Maxwell
Michael P. Strager
Timothy A. Warner
Christopher A. Ramezan
Alice N. Morgan
Cameron E. Pauley
author_sort Aaron E. Maxwell
title Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and Recommendations
title_short Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and Recommendations
title_full Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and Recommendations
title_fullStr Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and Recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and Recommendations
title_sort large-area, high spatial resolution land cover mapping using random forests, geobia, and naip orthophotography: findings and recommendations
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Despite the need for quality land cover information, large-area, high spatial resolution land cover mapping has proven to be a difficult task for a variety of reasons including large data volumes, complexity of developing training and validation datasets, data availability, and heterogeneity in data and landscape conditions. We investigate the use of geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA), random forest (RF) machine learning, and National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) orthophotography for mapping general land cover across the entire state of West Virginia, USA, an area of roughly 62,000 km<sup>2</sup>. We obtained an overall accuracy of 96.7% and a Kappa statistic of 0.886 using a combination of NAIP orthophotography and ancillary data. Despite the high overall classification accuracy, some classes were difficult to differentiate, as highlight by the low user&#8217;s and producer&#8217;s accuracies for the barren, impervious, and mixed developed classes. In contrast, forest, low vegetation, and water were generally mapped with accuracy. The inclusion of ancillary data and first- and second-order textural measures generally improved classification accuracy whereas band indices and object geometric measures were less valuable. Including super-object attributes improved the classification slightly; however, this increased the computational time and complexity. From the findings of this research and previous studies, recommendations are provided for mapping large spatial extents.
topic land cover
land cover mapping
object-based image analysis
GEOBIA
machine learning
random forests
National Agriculture Imagery Program
NAIP
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/12/1409
work_keys_str_mv AT aaronemaxwell largeareahighspatialresolutionlandcovermappingusingrandomforestsgeobiaandnaiporthophotographyfindingsandrecommendations
AT michaelpstrager largeareahighspatialresolutionlandcovermappingusingrandomforestsgeobiaandnaiporthophotographyfindingsandrecommendations
AT timothyawarner largeareahighspatialresolutionlandcovermappingusingrandomforestsgeobiaandnaiporthophotographyfindingsandrecommendations
AT christopheraramezan largeareahighspatialresolutionlandcovermappingusingrandomforestsgeobiaandnaiporthophotographyfindingsandrecommendations
AT alicenmorgan largeareahighspatialresolutionlandcovermappingusingrandomforestsgeobiaandnaiporthophotographyfindingsandrecommendations
AT cameronepauley largeareahighspatialresolutionlandcovermappingusingrandomforestsgeobiaandnaiporthophotographyfindingsandrecommendations
_version_ 1725159298883911680