Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and Recommendations
Despite the need for quality land cover information, large-area, high spatial resolution land cover mapping has proven to be a difficult task for a variety of reasons including large data volumes, complexity of developing training and validation datasets, data availability, and heterogeneity in data...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-06-01
|
Series: | Remote Sensing |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/12/1409 |
id |
doaj-232e82a85de24621aba2ee93e06d4000 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-232e82a85de24621aba2ee93e06d40002020-11-25T01:14:02ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922019-06-011112140910.3390/rs11121409rs11121409Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and RecommendationsAaron E. Maxwell0Michael P. Strager1Timothy A. Warner2Christopher A. Ramezan3Alice N. Morgan4Cameron E. Pauley5Department of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USADavis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Design, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USADepartment of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USADepartment of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USADavis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources, and Design, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USADepartment of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USADespite the need for quality land cover information, large-area, high spatial resolution land cover mapping has proven to be a difficult task for a variety of reasons including large data volumes, complexity of developing training and validation datasets, data availability, and heterogeneity in data and landscape conditions. We investigate the use of geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA), random forest (RF) machine learning, and National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) orthophotography for mapping general land cover across the entire state of West Virginia, USA, an area of roughly 62,000 km<sup>2</sup>. We obtained an overall accuracy of 96.7% and a Kappa statistic of 0.886 using a combination of NAIP orthophotography and ancillary data. Despite the high overall classification accuracy, some classes were difficult to differentiate, as highlight by the low user’s and producer’s accuracies for the barren, impervious, and mixed developed classes. In contrast, forest, low vegetation, and water were generally mapped with accuracy. The inclusion of ancillary data and first- and second-order textural measures generally improved classification accuracy whereas band indices and object geometric measures were less valuable. Including super-object attributes improved the classification slightly; however, this increased the computational time and complexity. From the findings of this research and previous studies, recommendations are provided for mapping large spatial extents.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/12/1409land coverland cover mappingobject-based image analysisGEOBIAmachine learningrandom forestsNational Agriculture Imagery ProgramNAIP |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aaron E. Maxwell Michael P. Strager Timothy A. Warner Christopher A. Ramezan Alice N. Morgan Cameron E. Pauley |
spellingShingle |
Aaron E. Maxwell Michael P. Strager Timothy A. Warner Christopher A. Ramezan Alice N. Morgan Cameron E. Pauley Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and Recommendations Remote Sensing land cover land cover mapping object-based image analysis GEOBIA machine learning random forests National Agriculture Imagery Program NAIP |
author_facet |
Aaron E. Maxwell Michael P. Strager Timothy A. Warner Christopher A. Ramezan Alice N. Morgan Cameron E. Pauley |
author_sort |
Aaron E. Maxwell |
title |
Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and Recommendations |
title_short |
Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and Recommendations |
title_full |
Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and Recommendations |
title_fullStr |
Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and Recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed |
Large-Area, High Spatial Resolution Land Cover Mapping Using Random Forests, GEOBIA, and NAIP Orthophotography: Findings and Recommendations |
title_sort |
large-area, high spatial resolution land cover mapping using random forests, geobia, and naip orthophotography: findings and recommendations |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Remote Sensing |
issn |
2072-4292 |
publishDate |
2019-06-01 |
description |
Despite the need for quality land cover information, large-area, high spatial resolution land cover mapping has proven to be a difficult task for a variety of reasons including large data volumes, complexity of developing training and validation datasets, data availability, and heterogeneity in data and landscape conditions. We investigate the use of geographic object-based image analysis (GEOBIA), random forest (RF) machine learning, and National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) orthophotography for mapping general land cover across the entire state of West Virginia, USA, an area of roughly 62,000 km<sup>2</sup>. We obtained an overall accuracy of 96.7% and a Kappa statistic of 0.886 using a combination of NAIP orthophotography and ancillary data. Despite the high overall classification accuracy, some classes were difficult to differentiate, as highlight by the low user’s and producer’s accuracies for the barren, impervious, and mixed developed classes. In contrast, forest, low vegetation, and water were generally mapped with accuracy. The inclusion of ancillary data and first- and second-order textural measures generally improved classification accuracy whereas band indices and object geometric measures were less valuable. Including super-object attributes improved the classification slightly; however, this increased the computational time and complexity. From the findings of this research and previous studies, recommendations are provided for mapping large spatial extents. |
topic |
land cover land cover mapping object-based image analysis GEOBIA machine learning random forests National Agriculture Imagery Program NAIP |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/12/1409 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aaronemaxwell largeareahighspatialresolutionlandcovermappingusingrandomforestsgeobiaandnaiporthophotographyfindingsandrecommendations AT michaelpstrager largeareahighspatialresolutionlandcovermappingusingrandomforestsgeobiaandnaiporthophotographyfindingsandrecommendations AT timothyawarner largeareahighspatialresolutionlandcovermappingusingrandomforestsgeobiaandnaiporthophotographyfindingsandrecommendations AT christopheraramezan largeareahighspatialresolutionlandcovermappingusingrandomforestsgeobiaandnaiporthophotographyfindingsandrecommendations AT alicenmorgan largeareahighspatialresolutionlandcovermappingusingrandomforestsgeobiaandnaiporthophotographyfindingsandrecommendations AT cameronepauley largeareahighspatialresolutionlandcovermappingusingrandomforestsgeobiaandnaiporthophotographyfindingsandrecommendations |
_version_ |
1725159298883911680 |