Are Leadership Fairness, Psychological Distress, and Role Stressors Interrelated? A Two-Wave Prospective Study of Forward and Reverse Relationships

While previous research has mainly considered leadership as an antecedent to psychological distress and role stressors (i.e., role ambiguity and role conflict) among subordinates, a reverse relationship where these variables influence reports of leadership is also possible. To determine the directio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Morten B. Nielsen, Jan O. Christensen, Live B. Finne, Stein Knardahl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00090/full
id doaj-2345082888f841e3a294262b8ecfbb20
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2345082888f841e3a294262b8ecfbb202020-11-24T21:54:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-02-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.00090324974Are Leadership Fairness, Psychological Distress, and Role Stressors Interrelated? A Two-Wave Prospective Study of Forward and Reverse RelationshipsMorten B. NielsenJan O. ChristensenLive B. FinneStein KnardahlWhile previous research has mainly considered leadership as an antecedent to psychological distress and role stressors (i.e., role ambiguity and role conflict) among subordinates, a reverse relationship where these variables influence reports of leadership is also possible. To determine the directionality of the associations this two-wave prospective study assesses bidirectional relationships between fair leadership and role stressors and examines whether psychological distress mediates the reciprocal associations between fair leadership and the role stressors. Analyses were conducted in a sample of 6,790 Norwegian employees with a 2-year time-lag between measurement points. Fair leadership was associated with lower stability adjusted role ambiguity, but not role conflict, over time. Role conflict, but not role ambiguity, was related to subsequent reports of the immediate leader as less fair. Psychological distress did neither mediate the relationship between fair leadership and subsequent reports of role stressors, nor the association between role stressors and subsequent reports of fair leadership. The findings suggest that the fair leadership – role stressor association is not a one-directional process, but that exposure to role stressors also influence subordinates’ perceptions of leadership. An implication of the findings is that theoretical models of organizational leadership should include this reverse impact of role stressors. To reduce the effects of role stressors, organizations could set consistent, clear and attractive goals and provide employees with necessary information for conducting their work tasks in order to help workers understand and master their roles at the workplace.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00090/fullrole conflict/ambiguityleadershipmental distresslongitudinalwork exposures
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Morten B. Nielsen
Jan O. Christensen
Live B. Finne
Stein Knardahl
spellingShingle Morten B. Nielsen
Jan O. Christensen
Live B. Finne
Stein Knardahl
Are Leadership Fairness, Psychological Distress, and Role Stressors Interrelated? A Two-Wave Prospective Study of Forward and Reverse Relationships
Frontiers in Psychology
role conflict/ambiguity
leadership
mental distress
longitudinal
work exposures
author_facet Morten B. Nielsen
Jan O. Christensen
Live B. Finne
Stein Knardahl
author_sort Morten B. Nielsen
title Are Leadership Fairness, Psychological Distress, and Role Stressors Interrelated? A Two-Wave Prospective Study of Forward and Reverse Relationships
title_short Are Leadership Fairness, Psychological Distress, and Role Stressors Interrelated? A Two-Wave Prospective Study of Forward and Reverse Relationships
title_full Are Leadership Fairness, Psychological Distress, and Role Stressors Interrelated? A Two-Wave Prospective Study of Forward and Reverse Relationships
title_fullStr Are Leadership Fairness, Psychological Distress, and Role Stressors Interrelated? A Two-Wave Prospective Study of Forward and Reverse Relationships
title_full_unstemmed Are Leadership Fairness, Psychological Distress, and Role Stressors Interrelated? A Two-Wave Prospective Study of Forward and Reverse Relationships
title_sort are leadership fairness, psychological distress, and role stressors interrelated? a two-wave prospective study of forward and reverse relationships
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-02-01
description While previous research has mainly considered leadership as an antecedent to psychological distress and role stressors (i.e., role ambiguity and role conflict) among subordinates, a reverse relationship where these variables influence reports of leadership is also possible. To determine the directionality of the associations this two-wave prospective study assesses bidirectional relationships between fair leadership and role stressors and examines whether psychological distress mediates the reciprocal associations between fair leadership and the role stressors. Analyses were conducted in a sample of 6,790 Norwegian employees with a 2-year time-lag between measurement points. Fair leadership was associated with lower stability adjusted role ambiguity, but not role conflict, over time. Role conflict, but not role ambiguity, was related to subsequent reports of the immediate leader as less fair. Psychological distress did neither mediate the relationship between fair leadership and subsequent reports of role stressors, nor the association between role stressors and subsequent reports of fair leadership. The findings suggest that the fair leadership – role stressor association is not a one-directional process, but that exposure to role stressors also influence subordinates’ perceptions of leadership. An implication of the findings is that theoretical models of organizational leadership should include this reverse impact of role stressors. To reduce the effects of role stressors, organizations could set consistent, clear and attractive goals and provide employees with necessary information for conducting their work tasks in order to help workers understand and master their roles at the workplace.
topic role conflict/ambiguity
leadership
mental distress
longitudinal
work exposures
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00090/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mortenbnielsen areleadershipfairnesspsychologicaldistressandrolestressorsinterrelatedatwowaveprospectivestudyofforwardandreverserelationships
AT janochristensen areleadershipfairnesspsychologicaldistressandrolestressorsinterrelatedatwowaveprospectivestudyofforwardandreverserelationships
AT livebfinne areleadershipfairnesspsychologicaldistressandrolestressorsinterrelatedatwowaveprospectivestudyofforwardandreverserelationships
AT steinknardahl areleadershipfairnesspsychologicaldistressandrolestressorsinterrelatedatwowaveprospectivestudyofforwardandreverserelationships
_version_ 1725868078079672320