Effects of Rubber Size on the Cracking Resistance of Rubberized Mortars

This study investigated the cracking resistance of rubberized cement-based mortars. Three rubber particle sizes were used: Rubber A (major particle size 2−4 mm), Rubber B (major particle size 1−3 mm), and Rubber C (major particle size 0−2 mm). Traditional restrained rin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yong Yu, Han Zhu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-09-01
Series:Materials
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/19/3132
id doaj-23842d6c5a534bbfbd08e738ccd4e62b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-23842d6c5a534bbfbd08e738ccd4e62b2020-11-25T01:11:53ZengMDPI AGMaterials1996-19442019-09-011219313210.3390/ma12193132ma12193132Effects of Rubber Size on the Cracking Resistance of Rubberized MortarsYong Yu0Han Zhu1School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, ChinaKey Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety, Tianjin University, Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300350, ChinaThis study investigated the cracking resistance of rubberized cement-based mortars. Three rubber particle sizes were used: Rubber A (major particle size 2&#8722;4 mm), Rubber B (major particle size 1&#8722;3 mm), and Rubber C (major particle size 0&#8722;2 mm). Traditional restrained ring shrinkage test (RRST), new restrained squared eccentric ring shrinkage test (RSERST), mechanical test, and scanning electron microscopy test were conducted. Results showed that the cracking inhibitory effect of Rubber B was the highest among the three rubber particle sizes. SEM results revealed that the particle size of the rubber does not have much effect on the ITZ (interfacial transition zone) position of rubber and cement paste. For the strength differences of the three types of rubberized mortar, it is mainly because the specific surface area increased as the rubber size decreased, which lead to more ITZ positions and pore structures. Our study verified that RSERST can predict the cracking position and shorten the test period. Compared with RRST, RSERST can also increase the restriction degree. <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>K</mi> <mi>R</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> is defined as the intensification factor of RSERST restriction degree. The average intensification factor is <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <msub> <mi>K</mi> <mi>R</mi> </msub> </mrow> <mo stretchy="true">&#175;</mo> </mover> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.17</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/19/3132rubberized cement-based mortarrubber particle sizestrengthrestrained ring shrinkage testrestrained squared eccentric ring shrinkage test
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yong Yu
Han Zhu
spellingShingle Yong Yu
Han Zhu
Effects of Rubber Size on the Cracking Resistance of Rubberized Mortars
Materials
rubberized cement-based mortar
rubber particle size
strength
restrained ring shrinkage test
restrained squared eccentric ring shrinkage test
author_facet Yong Yu
Han Zhu
author_sort Yong Yu
title Effects of Rubber Size on the Cracking Resistance of Rubberized Mortars
title_short Effects of Rubber Size on the Cracking Resistance of Rubberized Mortars
title_full Effects of Rubber Size on the Cracking Resistance of Rubberized Mortars
title_fullStr Effects of Rubber Size on the Cracking Resistance of Rubberized Mortars
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Rubber Size on the Cracking Resistance of Rubberized Mortars
title_sort effects of rubber size on the cracking resistance of rubberized mortars
publisher MDPI AG
series Materials
issn 1996-1944
publishDate 2019-09-01
description This study investigated the cracking resistance of rubberized cement-based mortars. Three rubber particle sizes were used: Rubber A (major particle size 2&#8722;4 mm), Rubber B (major particle size 1&#8722;3 mm), and Rubber C (major particle size 0&#8722;2 mm). Traditional restrained ring shrinkage test (RRST), new restrained squared eccentric ring shrinkage test (RSERST), mechanical test, and scanning electron microscopy test were conducted. Results showed that the cracking inhibitory effect of Rubber B was the highest among the three rubber particle sizes. SEM results revealed that the particle size of the rubber does not have much effect on the ITZ (interfacial transition zone) position of rubber and cement paste. For the strength differences of the three types of rubberized mortar, it is mainly because the specific surface area increased as the rubber size decreased, which lead to more ITZ positions and pore structures. Our study verified that RSERST can predict the cracking position and shorten the test period. Compared with RRST, RSERST can also increase the restriction degree. <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <msub> <mi>K</mi> <mi>R</mi> </msub> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula> is defined as the intensification factor of RSERST restriction degree. The average intensification factor is <inline-formula> <math display="inline"> <semantics> <mrow> <mover accent="true"> <mrow> <msub> <mi>K</mi> <mi>R</mi> </msub> </mrow> <mo stretchy="true">&#175;</mo> </mover> <mo>=</mo> <mn>1.17</mn> </mrow> </semantics> </math> </inline-formula>.
topic rubberized cement-based mortar
rubber particle size
strength
restrained ring shrinkage test
restrained squared eccentric ring shrinkage test
url https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/19/3132
work_keys_str_mv AT yongyu effectsofrubbersizeonthecrackingresistanceofrubberizedmortars
AT hanzhu effectsofrubbersizeonthecrackingresistanceofrubberizedmortars
_version_ 1725169134305542144