Contemporaneous and asymmetric volume-return relationship: cross-product evidence from an emerging market

This paper demonstrates that both Taiwan’s exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and equities exhibit an asymmetric volume-return relationship in which the ETF display a mixed, negative or positive, asymmetry and the equity exhibits primarily a positive asymmetry. The positive asymmetry in equities and its d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jung-Chu Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives" 2016-03-01
Series:Investment Management & Financial Innovations
Online Access:https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/7605/imfi_en_2016_01_Lin.pdf
id doaj-238553063a254b3aa4f138b42c16161b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-238553063a254b3aa4f138b42c16161b2020-11-25T02:52:39ZengLLC "CPC "Business Perspectives"Investment Management & Financial Innovations 1810-49671812-93582016-03-011319211110.21511/imfi.13(1).2016.097605Contemporaneous and asymmetric volume-return relationship: cross-product evidence from an emerging marketJung-Chu LinThis paper demonstrates that both Taiwan’s exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and equities exhibit an asymmetric volume-return relationship in which the ETF display a mixed, negative or positive, asymmetry and the equity exhibits primarily a positive asymmetry. The positive asymmetry in equities and its decline with the progressive elimination of the short-sale restriction on equities support the costly short-sale hypothesis, which considers a costly short-sale restriction or asymmetric transaction costs on long and short trading to be the source of the asymmetry. The part of a less positive asymmetry in ETFs also consists with what the costly short-sale hypothesis predicts. The later information models that consider asymmetrically-informed traders or the heterogeneity of traders to be the source of the asymmetry explain the negative asymmetry in ETFs and the upward trend in the magnitude of volume-return correlation with the grow of volume quintiles. An important conclusion is that not a single hypothesis can be a universal explanation for the asymmetric volume-return relationship. Which hypothesis may explain the volume-return asymmetry depends largely on whether the short-sale restriction is presenthttps://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/7605/imfi_en_2016_01_Lin.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jung-Chu Lin
spellingShingle Jung-Chu Lin
Contemporaneous and asymmetric volume-return relationship: cross-product evidence from an emerging market
Investment Management & Financial Innovations
author_facet Jung-Chu Lin
author_sort Jung-Chu Lin
title Contemporaneous and asymmetric volume-return relationship: cross-product evidence from an emerging market
title_short Contemporaneous and asymmetric volume-return relationship: cross-product evidence from an emerging market
title_full Contemporaneous and asymmetric volume-return relationship: cross-product evidence from an emerging market
title_fullStr Contemporaneous and asymmetric volume-return relationship: cross-product evidence from an emerging market
title_full_unstemmed Contemporaneous and asymmetric volume-return relationship: cross-product evidence from an emerging market
title_sort contemporaneous and asymmetric volume-return relationship: cross-product evidence from an emerging market
publisher LLC "CPC "Business Perspectives"
series Investment Management & Financial Innovations
issn 1810-4967
1812-9358
publishDate 2016-03-01
description This paper demonstrates that both Taiwan’s exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and equities exhibit an asymmetric volume-return relationship in which the ETF display a mixed, negative or positive, asymmetry and the equity exhibits primarily a positive asymmetry. The positive asymmetry in equities and its decline with the progressive elimination of the short-sale restriction on equities support the costly short-sale hypothesis, which considers a costly short-sale restriction or asymmetric transaction costs on long and short trading to be the source of the asymmetry. The part of a less positive asymmetry in ETFs also consists with what the costly short-sale hypothesis predicts. The later information models that consider asymmetrically-informed traders or the heterogeneity of traders to be the source of the asymmetry explain the negative asymmetry in ETFs and the upward trend in the magnitude of volume-return correlation with the grow of volume quintiles. An important conclusion is that not a single hypothesis can be a universal explanation for the asymmetric volume-return relationship. Which hypothesis may explain the volume-return asymmetry depends largely on whether the short-sale restriction is present
url https://businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/7605/imfi_en_2016_01_Lin.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT jungchulin contemporaneousandasymmetricvolumereturnrelationshipcrossproductevidencefromanemergingmarket
_version_ 1724728647455080448