Common Environment Policies in Different Sustainability Paradigms: Evidence From the Baltic, Adriatic, and Black Seas
We develop a model for four sustainability paradigms (weak sustainability, a-growth, de-growth, strong sustainability) within a single framework that accounts for responsibility for nature and future generations and for intra- and inter-generational equality. The model is applied in three case studi...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Marine Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2018.00216/full |
id |
doaj-239588c1892046758e431df5ea439fdf |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-239588c1892046758e431df5ea439fdf2020-11-24T20:54:27ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452018-06-01510.3389/fmars.2018.00216347821Common Environment Policies in Different Sustainability Paradigms: Evidence From the Baltic, Adriatic, and Black SeasFabio Zagonari0Stella Tsani1Stella Tsani2Sotiris Mavrikis3Phoebe Koundouri4Phoebe Koundouri5Phoebe Koundouri6Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Università di Bologna, Bologna, ItalyAthens University of Economics and Business, Athens, GreeceInternational Centre for Research on the Environment and the Economy, Athens, GreeceInternational Centre for Research on the Environment and the Economy, Athens, GreeceAthens University of Economics and Business, Athens, GreeceInternational Centre for Research on the Environment and the Economy, Athens, GreeceCentre for Climate Change and Economic Policy, London School of Economics, London, United KingdomWe develop a model for four sustainability paradigms (weak sustainability, a-growth, de-growth, strong sustainability) within a single framework that accounts for responsibility for nature and future generations and for intra- and inter-generational equality. The model is applied in three case studies: the Baltic, the Adriatic and the Black Sea with the aim to identify feasible sustainability solutions for shared seas under alternative sources of environmental pressure and cooperation strategies. The Baltic Sea is analyzed as an example of pollution from agriculture, the Adriatic Sea as an example of over-exploitation of fish in fishery, and the Black Sea as an example of pollution from industry. Empirical results show that different cooperation strategies are feasible in each case and that they yield different results in different context. Also welfare implications vary between different cooperation strategies. The main policy implication of the analysis is two-fold. Environmental conservation must be preferred to environmental innovation, where both intra- and inter-generational equity concerns are unessential. The choice of a different sustainability approaches must be combined with the feasibility of the differently required management institutions, while considerations of the sectoral sources of environmental pressure are essential.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2018.00216/fullsustainabilityequitymarine strategy frameworkAdriatic SeaBlack SeaBaltic Sea |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fabio Zagonari Stella Tsani Stella Tsani Sotiris Mavrikis Phoebe Koundouri Phoebe Koundouri Phoebe Koundouri |
spellingShingle |
Fabio Zagonari Stella Tsani Stella Tsani Sotiris Mavrikis Phoebe Koundouri Phoebe Koundouri Phoebe Koundouri Common Environment Policies in Different Sustainability Paradigms: Evidence From the Baltic, Adriatic, and Black Seas Frontiers in Marine Science sustainability equity marine strategy framework Adriatic Sea Black Sea Baltic Sea |
author_facet |
Fabio Zagonari Stella Tsani Stella Tsani Sotiris Mavrikis Phoebe Koundouri Phoebe Koundouri Phoebe Koundouri |
author_sort |
Fabio Zagonari |
title |
Common Environment Policies in Different Sustainability Paradigms: Evidence From the Baltic, Adriatic, and Black Seas |
title_short |
Common Environment Policies in Different Sustainability Paradigms: Evidence From the Baltic, Adriatic, and Black Seas |
title_full |
Common Environment Policies in Different Sustainability Paradigms: Evidence From the Baltic, Adriatic, and Black Seas |
title_fullStr |
Common Environment Policies in Different Sustainability Paradigms: Evidence From the Baltic, Adriatic, and Black Seas |
title_full_unstemmed |
Common Environment Policies in Different Sustainability Paradigms: Evidence From the Baltic, Adriatic, and Black Seas |
title_sort |
common environment policies in different sustainability paradigms: evidence from the baltic, adriatic, and black seas |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Marine Science |
issn |
2296-7745 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
We develop a model for four sustainability paradigms (weak sustainability, a-growth, de-growth, strong sustainability) within a single framework that accounts for responsibility for nature and future generations and for intra- and inter-generational equality. The model is applied in three case studies: the Baltic, the Adriatic and the Black Sea with the aim to identify feasible sustainability solutions for shared seas under alternative sources of environmental pressure and cooperation strategies. The Baltic Sea is analyzed as an example of pollution from agriculture, the Adriatic Sea as an example of over-exploitation of fish in fishery, and the Black Sea as an example of pollution from industry. Empirical results show that different cooperation strategies are feasible in each case and that they yield different results in different context. Also welfare implications vary between different cooperation strategies. The main policy implication of the analysis is two-fold. Environmental conservation must be preferred to environmental innovation, where both intra- and inter-generational equity concerns are unessential. The choice of a different sustainability approaches must be combined with the feasibility of the differently required management institutions, while considerations of the sectoral sources of environmental pressure are essential. |
topic |
sustainability equity marine strategy framework Adriatic Sea Black Sea Baltic Sea |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2018.00216/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fabiozagonari commonenvironmentpoliciesindifferentsustainabilityparadigmsevidencefromthebalticadriaticandblackseas AT stellatsani commonenvironmentpoliciesindifferentsustainabilityparadigmsevidencefromthebalticadriaticandblackseas AT stellatsani commonenvironmentpoliciesindifferentsustainabilityparadigmsevidencefromthebalticadriaticandblackseas AT sotirismavrikis commonenvironmentpoliciesindifferentsustainabilityparadigmsevidencefromthebalticadriaticandblackseas AT phoebekoundouri commonenvironmentpoliciesindifferentsustainabilityparadigmsevidencefromthebalticadriaticandblackseas AT phoebekoundouri commonenvironmentpoliciesindifferentsustainabilityparadigmsevidencefromthebalticadriaticandblackseas AT phoebekoundouri commonenvironmentpoliciesindifferentsustainabilityparadigmsevidencefromthebalticadriaticandblackseas |
_version_ |
1716794473050013696 |