A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis plan

Abstract Background The total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis (TARVA) trial aims to determine which surgical procedure confers the greatest improvement in pain-free function for patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Both procedures are effective but there has not yet been a direct...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrick Muller, Simon S. Skene, Kashfia Chowdhury, Suzie Cro, Andrew J. Goldberg, Caroline J. Doré, on behalf of the TARVA Study Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-02-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3973-4
id doaj-239c3c7ac9ef4b0e97d1196d45db6f09
record_format Article
spelling doaj-239c3c7ac9ef4b0e97d1196d45db6f092020-11-25T03:19:39ZengBMCTrials1745-62152020-02-012111910.1186/s13063-019-3973-4A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis planPatrick Muller0Simon S. Skene1Kashfia Chowdhury2Suzie Cro3Andrew J. Goldberg4Caroline J. Doré5on behalf of the TARVA Study GroupComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College LondonDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, School of Biosciences and Medicine, University of SurreyComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College LondonImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College LondonUCL Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science (IOMS), Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (RNOH)Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College LondonAbstract Background The total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis (TARVA) trial aims to determine which surgical procedure confers the greatest improvement in pain-free function for patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Both procedures are effective but there has not yet been a direct comparison to establish which is superior. This article describes the statistical analysis plan for this trial as an update to the published protocol. It is written prior to the end of patient follow-up, while the outcome of the trial is still unknown. Design and methods TARVA is a randomised, un-blinded, parallel group trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis. The primary outcome is the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire walking/standing domain score at 52 weeks post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include measures of pain, social interaction, physical function, quality of life, and range of motion. We describe in detail the statistical aspects of TARVA: the outcome measures, the sample size calculation, general analysis principles including treatment of missing data, the planned descriptive statistics and statistical models, and planned subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Discussion The TARVA statistical analysis will provide comprehensive and precise information on the relative effectiveness of the two treatments. The plan will be implemented in January 2020 when follow-up for the trial is completed. Trial registration ISRCTN registry number 60672307, ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02128555. Registered 1 May 2014. Recruitment started in January 2015 and ended in January 2019.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3973-4Statistical analysis planArthritisOsteoarthritisSurgeryTotal ankle replacementArthrodesis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Patrick Muller
Simon S. Skene
Kashfia Chowdhury
Suzie Cro
Andrew J. Goldberg
Caroline J. Doré
on behalf of the TARVA Study Group
spellingShingle Patrick Muller
Simon S. Skene
Kashfia Chowdhury
Suzie Cro
Andrew J. Goldberg
Caroline J. Doré
on behalf of the TARVA Study Group
A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis plan
Trials
Statistical analysis plan
Arthritis
Osteoarthritis
Surgery
Total ankle replacement
Arthrodesis
author_facet Patrick Muller
Simon S. Skene
Kashfia Chowdhury
Suzie Cro
Andrew J. Goldberg
Caroline J. Doré
on behalf of the TARVA Study Group
author_sort Patrick Muller
title A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis plan
title_short A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis plan
title_full A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis plan
title_fullStr A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis plan
title_full_unstemmed A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis plan
title_sort randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (tarva): statistical analysis plan
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Abstract Background The total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis (TARVA) trial aims to determine which surgical procedure confers the greatest improvement in pain-free function for patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Both procedures are effective but there has not yet been a direct comparison to establish which is superior. This article describes the statistical analysis plan for this trial as an update to the published protocol. It is written prior to the end of patient follow-up, while the outcome of the trial is still unknown. Design and methods TARVA is a randomised, un-blinded, parallel group trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis. The primary outcome is the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire walking/standing domain score at 52 weeks post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include measures of pain, social interaction, physical function, quality of life, and range of motion. We describe in detail the statistical aspects of TARVA: the outcome measures, the sample size calculation, general analysis principles including treatment of missing data, the planned descriptive statistics and statistical models, and planned subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Discussion The TARVA statistical analysis will provide comprehensive and precise information on the relative effectiveness of the two treatments. The plan will be implemented in January 2020 when follow-up for the trial is completed. Trial registration ISRCTN registry number 60672307, ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02128555. Registered 1 May 2014. Recruitment started in January 2015 and ended in January 2019.
topic Statistical analysis plan
Arthritis
Osteoarthritis
Surgery
Total ankle replacement
Arthrodesis
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3973-4
work_keys_str_mv AT patrickmuller arandomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan
AT simonsskene arandomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan
AT kashfiachowdhury arandomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan
AT suziecro arandomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan
AT andrewjgoldberg arandomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan
AT carolinejdore arandomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan
AT onbehalfofthetarvastudygroup arandomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan
AT patrickmuller randomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan
AT simonsskene randomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan
AT kashfiachowdhury randomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan
AT suziecro randomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan
AT andrewjgoldberg randomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan
AT carolinejdore randomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan
AT onbehalfofthetarvastudygroup randomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan
_version_ 1724620993228439552