A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis plan
Abstract Background The total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis (TARVA) trial aims to determine which surgical procedure confers the greatest improvement in pain-free function for patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Both procedures are effective but there has not yet been a direct...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3973-4 |
id |
doaj-239c3c7ac9ef4b0e97d1196d45db6f09 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-239c3c7ac9ef4b0e97d1196d45db6f092020-11-25T03:19:39ZengBMCTrials1745-62152020-02-012111910.1186/s13063-019-3973-4A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis planPatrick Muller0Simon S. Skene1Kashfia Chowdhury2Suzie Cro3Andrew J. Goldberg4Caroline J. Doré5on behalf of the TARVA Study GroupComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College LondonDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, School of Biosciences and Medicine, University of SurreyComprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College LondonImperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College LondonUCL Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science (IOMS), Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (RNOH)Comprehensive Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College LondonAbstract Background The total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis (TARVA) trial aims to determine which surgical procedure confers the greatest improvement in pain-free function for patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Both procedures are effective but there has not yet been a direct comparison to establish which is superior. This article describes the statistical analysis plan for this trial as an update to the published protocol. It is written prior to the end of patient follow-up, while the outcome of the trial is still unknown. Design and methods TARVA is a randomised, un-blinded, parallel group trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis. The primary outcome is the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire walking/standing domain score at 52 weeks post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include measures of pain, social interaction, physical function, quality of life, and range of motion. We describe in detail the statistical aspects of TARVA: the outcome measures, the sample size calculation, general analysis principles including treatment of missing data, the planned descriptive statistics and statistical models, and planned subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Discussion The TARVA statistical analysis will provide comprehensive and precise information on the relative effectiveness of the two treatments. The plan will be implemented in January 2020 when follow-up for the trial is completed. Trial registration ISRCTN registry number 60672307, ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02128555. Registered 1 May 2014. Recruitment started in January 2015 and ended in January 2019.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3973-4Statistical analysis planArthritisOsteoarthritisSurgeryTotal ankle replacementArthrodesis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Patrick Muller Simon S. Skene Kashfia Chowdhury Suzie Cro Andrew J. Goldberg Caroline J. Doré on behalf of the TARVA Study Group |
spellingShingle |
Patrick Muller Simon S. Skene Kashfia Chowdhury Suzie Cro Andrew J. Goldberg Caroline J. Doré on behalf of the TARVA Study Group A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis plan Trials Statistical analysis plan Arthritis Osteoarthritis Surgery Total ankle replacement Arthrodesis |
author_facet |
Patrick Muller Simon S. Skene Kashfia Chowdhury Suzie Cro Andrew J. Goldberg Caroline J. Doré on behalf of the TARVA Study Group |
author_sort |
Patrick Muller |
title |
A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis plan |
title_short |
A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis plan |
title_full |
A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis plan |
title_fullStr |
A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis plan |
title_full_unstemmed |
A randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (TARVA): statistical analysis plan |
title_sort |
randomised, multi-centre trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis in the treatment of patients with end stage ankle osteoarthritis (tarva): statistical analysis plan |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Trials |
issn |
1745-6215 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis (TARVA) trial aims to determine which surgical procedure confers the greatest improvement in pain-free function for patients with end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Both procedures are effective but there has not yet been a direct comparison to establish which is superior. This article describes the statistical analysis plan for this trial as an update to the published protocol. It is written prior to the end of patient follow-up, while the outcome of the trial is still unknown. Design and methods TARVA is a randomised, un-blinded, parallel group trial of total ankle replacement versus ankle arthrodesis. The primary outcome is the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire walking/standing domain score at 52 weeks post-surgery. Secondary outcomes include measures of pain, social interaction, physical function, quality of life, and range of motion. We describe in detail the statistical aspects of TARVA: the outcome measures, the sample size calculation, general analysis principles including treatment of missing data, the planned descriptive statistics and statistical models, and planned subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Discussion The TARVA statistical analysis will provide comprehensive and precise information on the relative effectiveness of the two treatments. The plan will be implemented in January 2020 when follow-up for the trial is completed. Trial registration ISRCTN registry number 60672307, ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02128555. Registered 1 May 2014. Recruitment started in January 2015 and ended in January 2019. |
topic |
Statistical analysis plan Arthritis Osteoarthritis Surgery Total ankle replacement Arthrodesis |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3973-4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT patrickmuller arandomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan AT simonsskene arandomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan AT kashfiachowdhury arandomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan AT suziecro arandomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan AT andrewjgoldberg arandomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan AT carolinejdore arandomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan AT onbehalfofthetarvastudygroup arandomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan AT patrickmuller randomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan AT simonsskene randomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan AT kashfiachowdhury randomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan AT suziecro randomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan AT andrewjgoldberg randomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan AT carolinejdore randomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan AT onbehalfofthetarvastudygroup randomisedmulticentretrialoftotalanklereplacementversusanklearthrodesisinthetreatmentofpatientswithendstageankleosteoarthritistarvastatisticalanalysisplan |
_version_ |
1724620993228439552 |