The Basic Slippery Slope Argument

Although studies have yielded a detailed taxonomy of types of slippery slope arguments, they have failed to identify a basic argumentation scheme that applies to all. Therefore, there is no way of telling whether a given argument is a slippery slope argument or not. This paper solves the problem by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Douglas Walton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2015-09-01
Series:Informal Logic
Subjects:
Online Access:https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4286
id doaj-23a6049e4de54c078e92b12034f125cf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-23a6049e4de54c078e92b12034f125cf2021-06-14T17:00:30ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25772293-734X2015-09-01353The Basic Slippery Slope ArgumentDouglas Walton0University of WindsorAlthough studies have yielded a detailed taxonomy of types of slippery slope arguments, they have failed to identify a basic argumentation scheme that applies to all. Therefore, there is no way of telling whether a given argument is a slippery slope argument or not. This paper solves the problem by providing a basic argumentation scheme. The scheme is shown to fit a clear and easily comprehensible example of a slippery slope argument that strongly appears to be reasonable, something that has also been lacking.https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4286argumentation schemescritical questionsargument from negative consequences
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Douglas Walton
spellingShingle Douglas Walton
The Basic Slippery Slope Argument
Informal Logic
argumentation schemes
critical questions
argument from negative consequences
author_facet Douglas Walton
author_sort Douglas Walton
title The Basic Slippery Slope Argument
title_short The Basic Slippery Slope Argument
title_full The Basic Slippery Slope Argument
title_fullStr The Basic Slippery Slope Argument
title_full_unstemmed The Basic Slippery Slope Argument
title_sort basic slippery slope argument
publisher University of Windsor
series Informal Logic
issn 0824-2577
2293-734X
publishDate 2015-09-01
description Although studies have yielded a detailed taxonomy of types of slippery slope arguments, they have failed to identify a basic argumentation scheme that applies to all. Therefore, there is no way of telling whether a given argument is a slippery slope argument or not. This paper solves the problem by providing a basic argumentation scheme. The scheme is shown to fit a clear and easily comprehensible example of a slippery slope argument that strongly appears to be reasonable, something that has also been lacking.
topic argumentation schemes
critical questions
argument from negative consequences
url https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4286
work_keys_str_mv AT douglaswalton thebasicslipperyslopeargument
AT douglaswalton basicslipperyslopeargument
_version_ 1721378107770798080