CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice
Most modern energy resolving, photon counting detectors employ small (sub 1 mm) pixels for high spatial resolution and low per pixel count rate requirements. These small pixels can suffer from a range of charge sharing effects (CSEs) that degrade both spectral analysis and imaging metrics. A range o...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-10-01
|
Series: | Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/21/6093 |
id |
doaj-23eff2ecef34426fbcc5150776a59132 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-23eff2ecef34426fbcc5150776a591322020-11-25T03:04:42ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202020-10-01206093609310.3390/s20216093CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm ChoiceOliver L. P. Pickford Scienti0Jeffrey C. Bamber1Dimitra G. Darambara2Joint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, UKJoint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, UKJoint Department of Physics, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London SM2 5NG, UKMost modern energy resolving, photon counting detectors employ small (sub 1 mm) pixels for high spatial resolution and low per pixel count rate requirements. These small pixels can suffer from a range of charge sharing effects (CSEs) that degrade both spectral analysis and imaging metrics. A range of charge sharing correction algorithms (CSCAs) have been proposed and validated by different groups to reduce CSEs, however their performance is often compared solely to the same system when no such corrections are made. In this paper, a combination of Monte Carlo and finite element methods are used to compare six different CSCAs with the case where no CSCA is employed, with respect to four different metrics: absolute detection efficiency, photopeak detection efficiency, relative coincidence counts, and binned spectral efficiency. The performance of the various CSCAs is explored when running on systems with pixel pitches ranging from 100 µm to 600µm, in 50 µm increments, and fluxes from 10<sup>6</sup> to 10<sup>8</sup> photons mm<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> are considered. Novel mechanistic explanations for the difference in performance of the various CSCAs are proposed and supported. This work represents a subset of a larger project in which pixel pitch, thickness, flux, and CSCA are all varied systematically.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/21/6093energy resolvingphoton countingspectral imagingCdTecharge sharing correctioncharge sharing effects |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Oliver L. P. Pickford Scienti Jeffrey C. Bamber Dimitra G. Darambara |
spellingShingle |
Oliver L. P. Pickford Scienti Jeffrey C. Bamber Dimitra G. Darambara CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice Sensors energy resolving photon counting spectral imaging CdTe charge sharing correction charge sharing effects |
author_facet |
Oliver L. P. Pickford Scienti Jeffrey C. Bamber Dimitra G. Darambara |
author_sort |
Oliver L. P. Pickford Scienti |
title |
CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice |
title_short |
CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice |
title_full |
CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice |
title_fullStr |
CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice |
title_full_unstemmed |
CdTe Based Energy Resolving, X-ray Photon Counting Detector Performance Assessment: The Effects of Charge Sharing Correction Algorithm Choice |
title_sort |
cdte based energy resolving, x-ray photon counting detector performance assessment: the effects of charge sharing correction algorithm choice |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sensors |
issn |
1424-8220 |
publishDate |
2020-10-01 |
description |
Most modern energy resolving, photon counting detectors employ small (sub 1 mm) pixels for high spatial resolution and low per pixel count rate requirements. These small pixels can suffer from a range of charge sharing effects (CSEs) that degrade both spectral analysis and imaging metrics. A range of charge sharing correction algorithms (CSCAs) have been proposed and validated by different groups to reduce CSEs, however their performance is often compared solely to the same system when no such corrections are made. In this paper, a combination of Monte Carlo and finite element methods are used to compare six different CSCAs with the case where no CSCA is employed, with respect to four different metrics: absolute detection efficiency, photopeak detection efficiency, relative coincidence counts, and binned spectral efficiency. The performance of the various CSCAs is explored when running on systems with pixel pitches ranging from 100 µm to 600µm, in 50 µm increments, and fluxes from 10<sup>6</sup> to 10<sup>8</sup> photons mm<sup>−2</sup> s<sup>−1</sup> are considered. Novel mechanistic explanations for the difference in performance of the various CSCAs are proposed and supported. This work represents a subset of a larger project in which pixel pitch, thickness, flux, and CSCA are all varied systematically. |
topic |
energy resolving photon counting spectral imaging CdTe charge sharing correction charge sharing effects |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/21/6093 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT oliverlppickfordscienti cdtebasedenergyresolvingxrayphotoncountingdetectorperformanceassessmenttheeffectsofchargesharingcorrectionalgorithmchoice AT jeffreycbamber cdtebasedenergyresolvingxrayphotoncountingdetectorperformanceassessmenttheeffectsofchargesharingcorrectionalgorithmchoice AT dimitragdarambara cdtebasedenergyresolvingxrayphotoncountingdetectorperformanceassessmenttheeffectsofchargesharingcorrectionalgorithmchoice |
_version_ |
1724680161702445056 |