The Point of Narratology: Part 2

Resisting the current fashion of calling everything, and ourselves as scholars, “post- ” something, as well as the unnoticed scholarly privileging of the present, or “presentism” that comes with it, I return in this article to an age-old novel, written by someone who was severely traumatized. Miguel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mieke Bal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Croatian Interdisciplinary Society 2019-06-01
Series:Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
Subjects:
Online Access:http://indecs.eu/2019/indecs2019-pp242-258.pdf
id doaj-2402678c17034c3abb1da29f7e8fec74
record_format Article
spelling doaj-2402678c17034c3abb1da29f7e8fec742020-11-24T22:11:30ZengCroatian Interdisciplinary SocietyInterdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems1334-46841334-46762019-06-01172-A24225810.7906/indecs.17.2.1The Point of Narratology: Part 2Mieke Bal0Amsterdam, NetherlandsResisting the current fashion of calling everything, and ourselves as scholars, “post- ” something, as well as the unnoticed scholarly privileging of the present, or “presentism” that comes with it, I return in this article to an age-old novel, written by someone who was severely traumatized. Miguel de Cervantes Saveedra wrote his world-famous novel Don Quijote after having been held as a slave in Algiers. “Trauma” is a state of stagnation and the impossibility of subjective remembrance that result from traumatogenic events; not the events themselves; the distortion of time and its forms that result, rather than the violence that causes the trauma. This implies that the traumatic state challenges narratological concepts such as event, development, and other temporal categories. Therefore, I will concentrate my discussion on focalisation and temporality as both problematic as well as indispensable, and end up arguing that the traditional interpretation can also be reversed: the hero did not go mad because he read too much, but escaped in reading to evade the traumatizing reality. In this article I revisit the concept of focalisation, in its tight connection, but not identity, to related concepts such as the gaze, looking, and imagining. The hypothesis that readers envision, that is, create, images from textual stimuli, cuts right through semantic theory, grammar, and rhetoric, to foreground the presence and crucial importance of images in reading; of imaging as part of that activity.http://indecs.eu/2019/indecs2019-pp242-258.pdfnarrativetraumafocalisationimaginationenvisioning
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mieke Bal
spellingShingle Mieke Bal
The Point of Narratology: Part 2
Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
narrative
trauma
focalisation
imagination
envisioning
author_facet Mieke Bal
author_sort Mieke Bal
title The Point of Narratology: Part 2
title_short The Point of Narratology: Part 2
title_full The Point of Narratology: Part 2
title_fullStr The Point of Narratology: Part 2
title_full_unstemmed The Point of Narratology: Part 2
title_sort point of narratology: part 2
publisher Croatian Interdisciplinary Society
series Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems
issn 1334-4684
1334-4676
publishDate 2019-06-01
description Resisting the current fashion of calling everything, and ourselves as scholars, “post- ” something, as well as the unnoticed scholarly privileging of the present, or “presentism” that comes with it, I return in this article to an age-old novel, written by someone who was severely traumatized. Miguel de Cervantes Saveedra wrote his world-famous novel Don Quijote after having been held as a slave in Algiers. “Trauma” is a state of stagnation and the impossibility of subjective remembrance that result from traumatogenic events; not the events themselves; the distortion of time and its forms that result, rather than the violence that causes the trauma. This implies that the traumatic state challenges narratological concepts such as event, development, and other temporal categories. Therefore, I will concentrate my discussion on focalisation and temporality as both problematic as well as indispensable, and end up arguing that the traditional interpretation can also be reversed: the hero did not go mad because he read too much, but escaped in reading to evade the traumatizing reality. In this article I revisit the concept of focalisation, in its tight connection, but not identity, to related concepts such as the gaze, looking, and imagining. The hypothesis that readers envision, that is, create, images from textual stimuli, cuts right through semantic theory, grammar, and rhetoric, to foreground the presence and crucial importance of images in reading; of imaging as part of that activity.
topic narrative
trauma
focalisation
imagination
envisioning
url http://indecs.eu/2019/indecs2019-pp242-258.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT miekebal thepointofnarratologypart2
AT miekebal pointofnarratologypart2
_version_ 1725805240192598016