Systematic Review and Quality Evaluation Using ARRIVE 2.0 Guidelines on Animal Models Used for Periosteal Distraction Osteogenesis
The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize all the preclinical studies carried out in periosteal distraction osteogenesis (PDO) in order to evaluate the quality using the ARRIVE guidelines. The animal models used, and the influence of the complications, were analysed in order to estab...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-04-01
|
Series: | Animals |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/5/1233 |
id |
doaj-2443c19209b948acbaf812fc4de82e6b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-2443c19209b948acbaf812fc4de82e6b2021-04-24T23:01:45ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152021-04-01111233123310.3390/ani11051233Systematic Review and Quality Evaluation Using ARRIVE 2.0 Guidelines on Animal Models Used for Periosteal Distraction OsteogenesisMario García-González0Fernando Muñoz1Antonio González-Cantalapiedra2Mónica López-Peña3Nikola Saulacic4Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, SpainDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, SpainDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, SpainDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, SpainDepartment of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bern, 3010 Bern, SwitzerlandThe objective of this systematic review was to synthesize all the preclinical studies carried out in periosteal distraction osteogenesis (PDO) in order to evaluate the quality using the ARRIVE guidelines. The animal models used, and the influence of the complications, were analysed in order to establish the most appropriate models for this technique. The PRISMA statements have been followed. Bibliographic sources have been consulted manually by two reviewers. Risk of bias was evaluated using the SYRCLE tool for animal studies, and the quality of the studies with the ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines. The selection criteria established by expert researchers were applied to decide which studies should be included in the review, that resulted in twenty-four studies. Only one achieved the maximum score according to the ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines. The rabbit as an animal model has presented good results in PDO, both for calvaria and jaw. Rats have shown good results for PDO in calvaria. The minipig should not be recommended as an animal model in PDO. Despite the increase in the quality of the studies since the implementation of the ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines, it would be necessary to improve the quality of the studies to facilitate the transparency, comparison, and reproducibility of future works.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/5/1233animal modelsperiosteal distraction osteogenesisosteogenic distractionbone regenerationsystematic review |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mario García-González Fernando Muñoz Antonio González-Cantalapiedra Mónica López-Peña Nikola Saulacic |
spellingShingle |
Mario García-González Fernando Muñoz Antonio González-Cantalapiedra Mónica López-Peña Nikola Saulacic Systematic Review and Quality Evaluation Using ARRIVE 2.0 Guidelines on Animal Models Used for Periosteal Distraction Osteogenesis Animals animal models periosteal distraction osteogenesis osteogenic distraction bone regeneration systematic review |
author_facet |
Mario García-González Fernando Muñoz Antonio González-Cantalapiedra Mónica López-Peña Nikola Saulacic |
author_sort |
Mario García-González |
title |
Systematic Review and Quality Evaluation Using ARRIVE 2.0 Guidelines on Animal Models Used for Periosteal Distraction Osteogenesis |
title_short |
Systematic Review and Quality Evaluation Using ARRIVE 2.0 Guidelines on Animal Models Used for Periosteal Distraction Osteogenesis |
title_full |
Systematic Review and Quality Evaluation Using ARRIVE 2.0 Guidelines on Animal Models Used for Periosteal Distraction Osteogenesis |
title_fullStr |
Systematic Review and Quality Evaluation Using ARRIVE 2.0 Guidelines on Animal Models Used for Periosteal Distraction Osteogenesis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Systematic Review and Quality Evaluation Using ARRIVE 2.0 Guidelines on Animal Models Used for Periosteal Distraction Osteogenesis |
title_sort |
systematic review and quality evaluation using arrive 2.0 guidelines on animal models used for periosteal distraction osteogenesis |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Animals |
issn |
2076-2615 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
The objective of this systematic review was to synthesize all the preclinical studies carried out in periosteal distraction osteogenesis (PDO) in order to evaluate the quality using the ARRIVE guidelines. The animal models used, and the influence of the complications, were analysed in order to establish the most appropriate models for this technique. The PRISMA statements have been followed. Bibliographic sources have been consulted manually by two reviewers. Risk of bias was evaluated using the SYRCLE tool for animal studies, and the quality of the studies with the ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines. The selection criteria established by expert researchers were applied to decide which studies should be included in the review, that resulted in twenty-four studies. Only one achieved the maximum score according to the ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines. The rabbit as an animal model has presented good results in PDO, both for calvaria and jaw. Rats have shown good results for PDO in calvaria. The minipig should not be recommended as an animal model in PDO. Despite the increase in the quality of the studies since the implementation of the ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines, it would be necessary to improve the quality of the studies to facilitate the transparency, comparison, and reproducibility of future works. |
topic |
animal models periosteal distraction osteogenesis osteogenic distraction bone regeneration systematic review |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/5/1233 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mariogarciagonzalez systematicreviewandqualityevaluationusingarrive20guidelinesonanimalmodelsusedforperiostealdistractionosteogenesis AT fernandomunoz systematicreviewandqualityevaluationusingarrive20guidelinesonanimalmodelsusedforperiostealdistractionosteogenesis AT antoniogonzalezcantalapiedra systematicreviewandqualityevaluationusingarrive20guidelinesonanimalmodelsusedforperiostealdistractionosteogenesis AT monicalopezpena systematicreviewandqualityevaluationusingarrive20guidelinesonanimalmodelsusedforperiostealdistractionosteogenesis AT nikolasaulacic systematicreviewandqualityevaluationusingarrive20guidelinesonanimalmodelsusedforperiostealdistractionosteogenesis |
_version_ |
1721510843231764480 |