Factors influencing utilisation of delivery services at the Jos University Teaching Hospital (Juth), Jos

Background: A preliminary unpublished review of two-year antenatal and labour ward records revealed that of the 4537 women seen at the antenatal clinic of Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH) per year, 2318 (51.1%) delivered in the labour ward per year. There is thus a gap between antenatal clini...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M A Shittu, C C Ekwempu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2012-01-01
Series:Sahel Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.smjonline.org/article.asp?issn=1118-8561;year=2012;volume=15;issue=1;spage=36;epage=40;aulast=Shittu;type=0
id doaj-245a3442d888477bb737eaad227078a5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-245a3442d888477bb737eaad227078a52020-11-24T23:36:31ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSahel Medical Journal2321-66892012-01-011513640Factors influencing utilisation of delivery services at the Jos University Teaching Hospital (Juth), JosM A ShittuC C EkwempuBackground: A preliminary unpublished review of two-year antenatal and labour ward records revealed that of the 4537 women seen at the antenatal clinic of Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH) per year, 2318 (51.1%) delivered in the labour ward per year. There is thus a gap between antenatal clinic attendance and hospital delivery in JUTH. Objectives: To determine the choice of place and its determinants for delivery among women attending antenatal clinic in JUTH. Study design: A cross-sectional design was used to study the proportion of pregnant women who booked for antenatal care in JUTH and delivered of the index pregnancy in the same institution. Results: A total of 347 women were recruited. The women′s place of delivery included JUTH (33.1%), home (31.1%), private health institutions (13.5%), primary health care centers (10.1%), other public hospitals (5.8%) and nursing homes (6.3%). Lack of privacy (22.4%) and long waiting-time (20.2%) were the main reason for non-utilization of the delivery services in JUTH. The other reasons included far distance (17.7%) and family members′ preference (11.6%). The utilisation of delivery services in JUTH was influenced by women′s education (p < 0.05) and first trimester booking in the index pregnancy (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Many women who booked for ANC in JUTH delivered by choice outside the institution. We recommend that pregnant women be given health education on the benefits of hospital delivery, particularly, in institutions where their antenatal history is known. This will ultimately reduce maternal morbidity and mortality.http://www.smjonline.org/article.asp?issn=1118-8561;year=2012;volume=15;issue=1;spage=36;epage=40;aulast=Shittu;type=0Antenatal clinicattendanceplace of delivery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M A Shittu
C C Ekwempu
spellingShingle M A Shittu
C C Ekwempu
Factors influencing utilisation of delivery services at the Jos University Teaching Hospital (Juth), Jos
Sahel Medical Journal
Antenatal clinic
attendance
place of delivery
author_facet M A Shittu
C C Ekwempu
author_sort M A Shittu
title Factors influencing utilisation of delivery services at the Jos University Teaching Hospital (Juth), Jos
title_short Factors influencing utilisation of delivery services at the Jos University Teaching Hospital (Juth), Jos
title_full Factors influencing utilisation of delivery services at the Jos University Teaching Hospital (Juth), Jos
title_fullStr Factors influencing utilisation of delivery services at the Jos University Teaching Hospital (Juth), Jos
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing utilisation of delivery services at the Jos University Teaching Hospital (Juth), Jos
title_sort factors influencing utilisation of delivery services at the jos university teaching hospital (juth), jos
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Sahel Medical Journal
issn 2321-6689
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Background: A preliminary unpublished review of two-year antenatal and labour ward records revealed that of the 4537 women seen at the antenatal clinic of Jos University Teaching Hospital (JUTH) per year, 2318 (51.1%) delivered in the labour ward per year. There is thus a gap between antenatal clinic attendance and hospital delivery in JUTH. Objectives: To determine the choice of place and its determinants for delivery among women attending antenatal clinic in JUTH. Study design: A cross-sectional design was used to study the proportion of pregnant women who booked for antenatal care in JUTH and delivered of the index pregnancy in the same institution. Results: A total of 347 women were recruited. The women′s place of delivery included JUTH (33.1%), home (31.1%), private health institutions (13.5%), primary health care centers (10.1%), other public hospitals (5.8%) and nursing homes (6.3%). Lack of privacy (22.4%) and long waiting-time (20.2%) were the main reason for non-utilization of the delivery services in JUTH. The other reasons included far distance (17.7%) and family members′ preference (11.6%). The utilisation of delivery services in JUTH was influenced by women′s education (p < 0.05) and first trimester booking in the index pregnancy (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Many women who booked for ANC in JUTH delivered by choice outside the institution. We recommend that pregnant women be given health education on the benefits of hospital delivery, particularly, in institutions where their antenatal history is known. This will ultimately reduce maternal morbidity and mortality.
topic Antenatal clinic
attendance
place of delivery
url http://www.smjonline.org/article.asp?issn=1118-8561;year=2012;volume=15;issue=1;spage=36;epage=40;aulast=Shittu;type=0
work_keys_str_mv AT mashittu factorsinfluencingutilisationofdeliveryservicesatthejosuniversityteachinghospitaljuthjos
AT ccekwempu factorsinfluencingutilisationofdeliveryservicesatthejosuniversityteachinghospitaljuthjos
_version_ 1725523163308097536